Revista Electrónica Educare (Educare Electronic Journal) EISSN: 1409-4258 Vol. 20(3) September-December, 2016: 1-24
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15359/ree.20-3.12
URL: http://www.una.ac.cr/educare
CORREO: educare@una.cr
[Número publicado el 01 de setiembre del 2016]
Impact of Armed Conflicts on Education and Educational Agents: A Multivocal Review
Impacto de los conflictos armados sobre la educación y sus agentes: Una revisión multivocal
Luisa Cervantes-Duarte1
Universidad de Granada
Granada, España
correo: cervantes.duarte.l@gmail.com
orcid: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3832-9963
Antonio Fernández-Cano2
Universidad de Granada
Granada, España
correo: afcano@ugr.es
orcid: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3991-4443
Recibido 19 de diciembre de 2015 • Corregido 30 de junio de 2016 • Aceptado 16 de agosto de 2016
Abstract. This paper investigates the short and long-term pernicious impact of armed conflicts on education and educational agents (students, teachers and students’ parents), using a multivocal review by means of the integration and qualitative analysis of 60 research reports (voices) found in two databases: Web of Science and PROQUEST in the period between 1995 –date of the first founding paper- until 2014. Through the analysis of source data (voices) and taking the “multivocal review” as a method, the voices have been combined in nine categories, namely: a) Refusal and impediments to a return to education; b) Educational infrastructure damaged or destroyed; c) Cuts in or withdrawal of spending on education; d) Loss of the educational and protective functions of the family; e) Loss of the academic community; f) Non-qualified teaching staff; g) Drastic loss of skills; h) Abandoning school (population movements, destruction of networks and social environment); i) Behavioural problems: traumas, pedagogical roles and self-victimization. These categories have highlighted the serious consequences arising from conflicts, infringing as they do the most basic human rights and in particular the right to a sound education during childhood.
Keywords. Armed conflicts; education; multivocal review; qualitative synthesis study
Resumen. Este trabajo indaga el impacto pernicioso de los conflictos armados a corto y largo plazo sobre la educación y sus agentes (alumnado, profesorado y, padres y madres del alumnado) a partir de la integración y el análisis cualitativo de 60 investigaciones localizadas en dos bases de datos: Web of Science y PROQUEST, en el periodo comprendido entre 1995 –año del primer artículo integrado en la muestra- hasta 2014. A través del análisis de dichos artículos y tomando como método la revisión multivocal, las voces han sido aunadas en nueve categorías, a saber: a) rechazo e impedimentos para regresar a la educación; b) infraestructuras educativas dañadas o destruidas; c) reducción o retirada de la inversión en educación; d) pérdida de la función protectora y educativa de la familia; e) pérdida de la comunidad académica; f) profesorado no cualificado; g) drástica pérdida de habilidades; h) abandono escolar; i) problemas de comportamiento: traumas, roles pedagógicos y auto victimización. Estas categorías han puesto de manifiesto las graves consecuencias que los conflictos generan conculcando los derechos humanos más elementales y en especial el derecho a una buena educación de la infancia.
Palabras claves. Conflictos armados; educación; revisión multivocal; estudio cualitativo de síntesis
The Argives killed this child because they feared him?
The epigram is a shameful one for Greece
(The Trojan Women, 1188-91, Euripides)
Introduction
Rojas (2011) asserts that nearly everything considered as “human” can be found in childhood. When this stage of life was happy, healthy, full of affection and properly directed, people are left with the strength to deal with anything. Being a child during a time of armed conflict, however, is not an easy experience. Armed conflicts affect millions of children, their daily life being disturbed by acts of atrocity which will mark their future.
This reality affects a fundamental right of children: their education. All agents of education are affected in these circumstances: the education team, students, family, infrastructure, the school environment, curriculum and the strategies delivered by teachers. It is estimated that “approximately 57 million children of primary school age did not attend school in 2011” (Unicef, 2014, p. 18), and more than 13 million of those children are in the countries, directly or indirectly, affected by armed conflicts (Unicef, 2015). It happens although decades ago United nations´ agencies and other International non-governamental organizatios began to prioritize education as an essential component of humanitarian response due to the recognition that education can play a critical role in facilitating stability, imparting life-saving messages, establishing among other reasons (Mendenhal, 2014).
Armed conflict and its consequences for the community have been studied extensively within different fields. From one perspective there are studies which examine “what” and “how” people live in the places affected by conflict, such as those carried out by Spitzer and Twikirize (2012), Pedersen and Sommerfelt (2007), González y Bedmar (2012) and that of Glasgow and Baer (2011). Other studies have been undertaken from an economic perspective (López & Wodon, 2005), from a physical, mental and social health perspective (Kapor-Stanulovic, 1999; Rieder & Choonara, 2012; Massad et al., 2012), or have been centred on therapies to improve the personal circumstances of those affected by conflict (Minou, 2006).
When the two constructs proposed in this paper are combined, it can be observed that the majority of the retrieved literature adopts a predominantly theoretical, anecdotal or instructive approach. In view of the absence of research reports which link the two constructs of the present paper, that is to say armed conflict and education, the following research question arises: what empirical evidence is there regarding the consequences of armed conflicts on children’s education, on teachers and, indirectly, on the parents of those children as educational agents?
Through this question, it is intended to combine in a document the extent of the consequences of armed conflict bring out in the current literature, through the analysis of economic, social and personal factors, –such as mental health and the actual decision to continue or not with the studies– that affect the education of children, considering necessary to emphasize the incongruity between reality and policy approaches, in order to stimulate debate enabling children to reach their right to education.
In our view, education is the most effective means to avoid conflicts in the future. Hence it is considered necessary to denounce anything that can negatively affect even deny this right.
Methodology: A multivocal review
Multivocal review, a term coined by Ogawa and Malen (1991), refers to qualitative synthesis, the purpose of which is to investigate a complex phenomenon of interest where events may not be manipulated and about which there are multiple, predominantly qualitative (but also quantitative) data sources in order to obtain a detailed description of the phenomenon being studied.
This method enables the voices collected by means of a bibliographic search to be compiled and for this information to be organised into categories and subcategories which permit the researcher to obtain a detailed description of the reality being analysed. In order to do this, six fundamental steps must be followed to guarantee the rigor of the paper being presented:
Fernández-Cano, Torralbo, Vallejo and Fernández-Guerrero (2012) proposed a similar approach to qualitative synthesis as cultural narratives that could be used as metaphors or interpretative similes for explanatory and evaluative purposes in educational research and evaluation.
Research process
Search Strategy
The search for documents was focused solely on empirical research reports dealing with the subject of armed conflict and its consequences on children’s education and on their educational agents. Two databases were searched: Web of Science and PROQUEST, using the following keywords in the subject field: conflict armed and (child*or school* or teach* or pedagogy).
Data abstraction
From the original articles analysed, the following entries were inferred: title, author(s), type of document (primary, P, secondary or integrative, S, secondary analysis3, SA), methodology (qualitative, C, quantitative, Q, or mixed, M), sample, country in conflict and consequences as defined by the code, which are not exposed here for reasons of brevity but are included and commented upon in the ‘Results’ section. From these entries, a category system was created based upon the mixed model (a category or consequence could be inferred in a same documents-voice) and resulting in the following general categorisation system (Table 1):
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Having performed the search using the above-mentioned sequence, a total of 60 documents were selected, based upon the following inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Inclusion criteria: empirical study where the entire sample or part of it includes an educational agent, and which is related, directly or indirectly, to education.
Exclusion criteria: articles which are theoretical based on opinion or which are anecdotal; convention and conference documents and proceedings; documents produced by NGOs aimed at raising public awareness in developed countries at the peak of any conflict, and evaluation reports.
Fuller versions of the retrieved papers (voices) included are available in Cervantes and Fernández-Cano (2014). They have been summarised here as documentary evidence (Table 2).
Results
Refusal and impediments to a return to education
The years of conflict represent an interruption to the education of these children, and for this reason many of them will often not want to return to school or they will do so belatedly. For these children (according to Shakya, 2011) this interruption to their routine and the years spent away from the classroom are a source of embarrassment when the time comes to return to education, and they are thus unwilling to make that step. To understand this one should take into account that their peer group would have advanced and that they would be returning to class with groups of a younger age corresponding to their academic level. Many of them feel too old to go to school, although this does not diminish their willingness to receive education. The marginalisation that they suffer from members of the community also separates them in centres of learning.
Another frequent situation during a time of conflict where children are displaced is their enrolment in new centres of learning alongside different cultures. When a child is moved to from a centre of learning, he or she will need a certain time to acclimatise to that new environment. For children who have suffered the consequences of armed conflict and have been displaced as a result, the period of acclimatisation may be more complex and lengthier. Naciones Unidas. Asamblea General (1996) described in her report one reality which children have to face during population movements: states offering political asylum may refuse to provide education to refugees for fear of this encouraging them to remain indefinitely in that country. In such a case, this is not a refusal of the children themselves, but rather an impediment to them exercising their right to education.
Another important issue which prevents children from returning to education is the inadequate economic conditions of some families, forcing children to search for work (Cáceres et al., 2002).
If the positive effects which returning to learning may have on children and on their mental health are analysed, it can be seen that any rejection and/or impediment to returning to education may worsen the post-traumatic symptoms from which these children suffer, since the intervention programmes followed have to be based on a context in which school and the other educational agents have to play a part. It is for this reason that it should be considered essential to run a campaign to raise public awareness, principally among children and families, of how important and necessary returning to education is for their future.
Educational infrastructure damaged or destroyed
During the period of conflict, all infrastructures suffer damage as a result of bombing, fires and combat. Centres of learning are no exception. Both schools and universities, as well as museums, hospitals and other governmental buildings are damaged and looted (Dimitry, 2012)
When considering the reasons for these attacks and thinking of the context in which conflicts occur, it can be deduced that the ideological confrontation between the opposing factions incites them to attack those places where the population may be indoctrinated, either as a means of recruiting followers or attacking and hurting the enemy.
There are thus not only a significant number of attacks on centres of learning with the objective of destroying places where the young gather, but those places are also used as centres of recruitment and re-education in favour of the armed group occupying the centre. Many of the walls of these centres are used for propaganda purposes. The United Nations has observed that schools had been used as barracks, weapon storage facilities, command centres, detention centres, interrogation facilities and attack positions with firearms and weapons of observation (Naciones Unidas. Asamblea General, 2013).
The different cultures of the diverse countries in conflict lend this category a difference which may be decisive when it comes to attacking schools: gender. According to statistics, in countries such as Pakistan and Afghanistan, where women have traditionally been submissive, all-girls schools are the most frequently attacked, followed by mixed-sex schools and, finally, all-boys schools. To a certain extent this balances the differences to be found when comparing by gender the damage inflicted. If boys are recruited into the army and consequently lose their right to education, it could be argued that the impact of a conflict is greater on boys than it is on girls. Nevertheless, due to the privation and destruction of schools and other related infrastructure, the effects are similar for both (Shemyakina, 2011). Furthermore, one should not overlook the fact that girls are also sent to the front, kidnapped and used as sex slaves, thus denying them their right to education.
It is worth mentioning that in some places education is so important that children who cannot attend a public school organise classes in different environments: under trees or in small rooms, in order to follow the curriculum set out by the education ministry of each specific country (Winthrop & Kirk, 2008). Another initiative of this kind is the learning communities referred to in Bragin (2012).
Cuts or withdrawal of spending on education
In economic terms, it is known that periods of conflict are seriously detrimental to the conditions of the country and, obviously, spending on arms and defence rockets. O’Hare and Southall (2007) provide data which reveals that spending on education and health is significantly lower and that spending on defence is significantly higher if there has been a recent conflict. Furthermore, according to the yearbook of the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, SIPRI (2013), global military spending in 2012 reached 1.756 trillion dollars. An Education for All monitoring report –No progress in reducing global number of children out of school– (Unesco, 2014) demonstrates that if wealthy countries were to reallocate 6 days of military spending to education, the deficit of 16 billion dollars required annually to achieve education for all would be eliminated, enabling the education of all the children in the world in 2015 (Unesco, 2011). Poirier (2012) obtains similar results. He claims that the calculation of the effects with average margin demonstrates that the percentage of children not attending school could decrease by 1.7% and that the percentage of children completing primary and secondary education could increase by 4.4 % and 2.6 % respectively, if an extra 1% of GDP were allocated to education. Moreover, the percentage of humanitarian aid allocated to education has been reducing over the years: in 2009 it was 2.2% compared to 1.4% in 2012 (Unesco, Instituto for Statistics y Unicef, 2015).
All of the information outlined in the paragraph above compels one to question what benefit is to be obtained from reducing spending on education and why, if there is a reasonably credible solution, this has not yet been implemented. Wealthy countries have political and economic interests in prolonging conflicts in less developed countries, since this implies an increase to GDP resulting from the production and export of arms to countries at war. It should be noted that 5 of the 6 main arms exporting nations are permanent members of the United Nations Security Council. In addition, as long as wars are waged in poor countries, developed countries will not find themselves directly affected by the negative consequences.
Loss of the educational and protective functions of the family
The family exerts a positive influence in terms of the psychological and social support with which they provide the child soldier and children affected by armed conflicts. But furthermore, the family also has an influence on the decisions of children and consequently on their education. From one perspective, there is a positive influence, since in many places education is something which is valued and respected (Winthrop & Kirk, 2008), a factor which encourages children to attend school. Parents’ fear that children may be attacked on their way to school and that centres of learning may be targeted, however, can lead to a reluctance to allow their children to attend school. During the war of Tajikistan, for instance, some parents were reluctant to allow their daughters to attend class for fear of them being persecuted by soldiers on their way to school (Gomart, 2003; Fakingham, 2000, cited by Shemyakina, 2011). Another example is to be found in De Castro et al. (2012) in which both parents and children, as a result of living some distance away from their school, decide against attending class for fear of being caught in crossfire during their journey.
Loss of the academic community
Since 2007, “there have been thousands of reported cases of students, teachers, professors, academics and other members of the educational community being taken prisoner, held in captivity, beaten, tortured, burnt alive, shot by rebels, armies and repressive regimes; imprisoned or raped by armed groups or forces in school or on their way to school” (Unesco, 2010, p. 14).
Due to their privileged position as conveyors of knowledge, their access to the most vulnerable members of the population, and their embrace of political ideals that are respected by the community, those within the teaching profession are a very tempting prey for armed groups and the military. This is evidenced in the report Education under attack (Unesco, 2010). In view of this situation, the teaching profession’s fear of going to work is more than evident and justified, leading to reduced staff and increased teacher/pupil ratio in places where conflict is in effect. The lack of educational staff increases the difficulty of responding to the educational needs of children and even reduces the possibility of access to education.
Non-qualified teaching staff
Many of the teachers who give classes have not been trained for the job and obtain the position as a result of being the members of the community with the highest level of education (Winthrop & Kirk, 2008). The absence of qualified teaching staff may give rise to difficulties in correctly implementing the curriculum and mitigating the problems that conflicts can bring into the classroom. This represents one of the main problems with which the education system has to deal in a war context, alongside its own welfare and protection, as well as that of the children in class.
The student-teacher ratio may reach 50:1. Students often do not have teachers, the latter having fled to safer places; timetables are reduced or interrupted; “schools are often closed for long extended periods, sometimes from fear, sometimes by decree” (Ressler, Tortorici & Marcelino, 1993, p. 210).
School counsellors are another facet of the academic community which does not emerge favourably from the consequences of conflict. Population movements generate new educational challenges. Different cultures and religions are brought together in centres of learning, and creating an atmosphere of peaceful coexistence in the classroom and playground, in so far as is possible, is a complex task. The role of the school counsellor is decisive here. But furthermore, the events experienced by civilians require school counsellors to implement new psychological and support strategies aimed at reducing the anxiety following terror attacks, reassuring the children and offering them the opportunity to legitimise their feelings (Tatar & Horenczyk, 2003). In such moments, mutual understanding between all members of the academic community is crucial to obtaining positive results in matters of teaching and coexistence.
Drastic loss of skills
Conflict situations imply a serious alteration in the development of students’ skills. It has been found that following exposure to conflict many children have problems with linguistic skills and cognitive development (Elbert, et al., 2009), and thus present specific learning and support needs (Alborz, 2013).
There exist centres of learning which encourage violent behaviour and intolerance Bush and Saltarelli (cited by Poirier, 2012) allude to the two sides of education: its positive side leads to the building of peace, and is a means of socialisation; its negative side defines education as a “catalytic weapon of war”, which can foster intolerance, prevent certain groups from attending school, or exacerbate ethnic tension. For the latter of these two sides, a change to the curriculum and re-education programmes which have been imposed to encourage recruitment arises (Unesco, 2010).
Abandoning education
In conflict situations, fear is one of the principal reasons why populations abandon their places of origin (Cáceres et al., 2002). During such population movements it is frequent for the family to become separated (Chase, et al., 1999). This breaking up of the family unit, and in particular the absence of parents, can produce an increase in the percentage of children who abandon their studies in order to work, or who work more than 45 hours per week, in poorly regulated conditions which do not guarantee the chance of exercising their basic rights. (Cáceres et al., 2002).
At times where there is no conflict, in general children grow and learn while they mix with their peer group and the environment around them. The children themselves recognise how important their friends from school are as a source of help and development of their own learning (Winthrop & Kirk, 2008). During conflict, however, the possibility of positive interaction between the child and the social environment is reduced. On one side, the existence of an atmosphere of fear and intolerance means that parents do not allow children to leave the house, going as far as setting limits on where they may play and on their social circle.
Education therefore plays a very important role when the moment comes to help children reintegrate into the social environment. Bragin (2012) states that school is the best remedy for children affected by conflict, as it is a place of normalised experiences, such as spending time with other children, which bring routine to their lives. Nevertheless, in spite of the greater part of society living in a conflict environment recognising the importance of education, children, immersed in that environment of violence, suffer from attacks whose only purpose is to prevent them from exercising their right to education. On 13th November 2008 it was reported in the media that in an act attributed to the Taliban, a group of girls had been attacked with acid for going to school (OTR/PRESS, 2008).
Behavioural problems in and out of school
Another of the main consequences which derive from armed conflicts are the psychological and mental disorders suffered from children during and after the conflict. In the different documents analysed, it is shown that all the participants in the study by Kohrt, et al. (2008) suffered from at least one form of trauma, among the most common of which are distraction, hostility, emotional instability, sorrow, withdrawal, difficulty sleeping, nightmares, and suspicion (Al-Eissa, 1995); depression, irritability, aggression, isolation, symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder, and paranoia (Rashid, 2012); nervousness, anxious arousal (Dimitry, 2012); loss of the ability to concentrate, passivity, loss of spontaneity, and sorrow (Guy, 2009), and suicidal tendencies (Flink et al., 2013).
Generally, the above-mentioned problems arise as a result of frequent exposure to conflict. It should not be forgotten, however, that the worst consequences arise from the atrocities committed by children themselves playing the role of soldiers, whether that be voluntarily or involuntarily (The National Child Traumatic Stress Network, NCTSN, 2005). In this way, their transition from victim to perpetrator is a carefully orchestrated reconfiguration process of their identity, the purpose of which is to sever all links with society (Honwana, 2009). This process goes temporarily beyond the conflict. Once the conflict is over, many children suffer from “appetitive aggression” (Crombach et al., 2013) and even maintain a symbolic link to the armed group, becoming their points of reference (Jiménez-Caballero, 2009).
Each of these psychological disorders leads to behavioural disorders, found in the studies of Dimitry (2012) and Miller et al. (1999), thus complicating the work of teachers as well as the children’s attendance at centres of learning. Many of them suffer from aggressive and/or regressive behaviour (Al-Eissa, 1995). Even the children themselves allude to behavioural problems among the academic staff, reporting beatings, insults, corruption and cruelty (Winthrop & Kirk, 2008).
It is important to underline that the family environment as well as clinical intervention in the form of counselling and parents’ education could be an effective measure with which to alleviate, to a certain extent, such negative effects of the conflict (Zahr, 1996).
Conclusions
Multivocal review brought to light that: a) the most affected places by the conflicto are, between other, Nepal, Uganda and Colombia; and b) that the most frequency categories are: Refusal and impediments to a return to education (C1), loss of the educational and protective functions of the family (C4) y behavioural problems (C9).
Furthermore, it has revealed, according to the aim of this research, how the different consequences suffered by children living in countries where armed conflict is a part of daily life and strongly restric the possibilities of education access. Although also disclose regrettable dates, as paradoxical as it may seem, refered to children who have to join armed groups to exercise their right to education, and that this right is violated afterwards as a consequence of political interests.
As has been demonstrated, the negative consequences which armed conflicts impose on education are far-reaching and diverse. Even so, it is a field which requires further research. In spite of the attempts of various organisations such as UNESCO and UNICEF, the publications and activities of which attempt to focus the community’s attention on education, it does not appear that a policy action has been adopted which condemns and, even more so, avoids acts of atrocity which condition the present and determine the future of these children (Bragin & Opiro, 2012) included university students (Bernardo & Baranovich, 2014).
On a psychological and physical level these children suffer a multitude of abuse and wrongdoing which are neither penalised nor punished by international law, leaving their lives at the mercy of mercenaries whose political ideals go against millions of lives and whose main purpose is to remove any means of conveying knowledge in order to create a submissive and easily manipulated society.
Despite the promises and best intentions defined in the EFA (Education for All) objectives (to educate the world population, and teach it reading and writing), and in spite of the progress which has been made since then, not one of the objectives is going to be achieved on a global scale (Unesco, 2015).
In 2013 it had already been proposed that the deadline should be extended by another 15 years, modifying the objectives set out in 2000 (Torres, 2013). As the first objectives of Education for All were defined in 1990, at the World Conference on Education for All held in Jomtien, Thailand, 25 years have been spent attempting to achieve objectives which do not coincide with the interests of every world power. In the event of the timescale being prolonged by another 15 years, as is being considered, almost half a century will have been required to attain the currently unachieved objectives and complete the tasks needed to eradicate inequalities in education.
As a pedagogist, we emphasize the need to comply with agreements and develop in schools a real education for peace, assumed by the community, to help reduce tensions and resolve conflicts nonviolently. We must prevent conflict before it becomes seen as a normal situation and act to generate the least possible impact on children. Education as a fundamental right of the child and defensive weapon against injustice, must be defended.
As stated in the report Unesco (2007), the creation of inclusive schools and universities which should become sanctuaries of peace and tolerance under the protection of every involved party is something that should be fought for, and these should contribute towards reducing tension and resolving conflicts (Unesco, 2007). This would necessitate Education for All no longer being viewed as a utopia, and starting instead to consider it as a reality, firmly committing to the accomplishment of the objectives defined.
Nevertheless, ensuring that all children are integrated into an educational community should not to be achieved at the expense of the quality of such education. Banking education, a term coined by Paulo Freire in 1970 (Freire, 2007), is to be avoided, and instead children should be involved in a liberating education which promotes critical thinking. In this way, by creating citizens capable of critical thinking, there would be no place in society for armed conflicts.
Furthermore, in so far as education and health recovery programmes are concerned, these should focus on each individual as a unique being, rather than implementing universal models and expecting the same results in a broad population group without considering the particularities and/or context of each case (Tol et al., 2013). To do so, it would be necessary to begin with qualitative analysis of the context in which the programme is to be implemented and modify it appropriately to have the possibility of improving the results for its beneficiaries.
While the above mentioned objectives are achieved, a commitment should be made to ensure that education offers a sense of normality to daily life, something which is necessary for the emotional stability of children, on condition that political interests are not brought into play, and the children’s rights are respected. According to UNICEF, those rights are based on four principles: a) non-discrimination, b) the best interests of the child, c) the right to life, survival and development and d) participation. Special mention should be given to the determination of these children and the communities of which they are part to exercise their right to education, and their view that by way of knowledge they will be able aspire to a better future.
Referencias
References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the multivocal review.
Ager, A., Akesson, B., Stark, L., Flouri, E., Okot, B., McCollister, F., & Boothby, N. (2011). The impact of the school-based psychosocial structured activities (PSSA) program on conflict-affected children in northern Uganda. Journal of the Child Psychology, and Psychiatry, and allied disciplines, 52(11), 1124-1133. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02407.x
*Al-Eissa, Y. A. (1995). The impact of the gulf armed conflict on the health and behaviour of Kuwaiti children. Social, Science & Medicine, 41(7), 1033-1037. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(94)00414-O
*Albertyn, R., Bickler, S. W., Vas As, A. B., Millar, A. J. W., & Rode, H. (2003). The effects of war on children in Africa. Pediatric Surgery International, 19(4), 227-232. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00383-002-0926-9
*Alborz, A. (2013). Environmental characteristics and prevalence of birth defects among children in post-war Iraq: implications for policies on rebuilding the Iraqi education system. Medicine, Conflict, and Survival, 29(1), 26-44. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13623699.2013.765197
Amundsen, C., & Wilson, M. (2012). Are we asking the right questions? A conceptual review of the educational development literature in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 82(1), 90-126. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0034654312438409
*Attanayake, V., McKay, R., Joffres, M., Singh, S., Burkle F. Jr., & Mills E. (January-March, 2009). Prevalence of mental disorders among children exposed to war: a systematic review of 7,920 children. Medicine, Conflict and Survival, 25(1), 4-19. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13623690802568913
*Bell, V., Méndez, F., Martínez, C., Palma, P. P., & Bosch, M. (2012). Characteristics of the Colombian armed conflict and the mental health of cibilants living in active conflict zones. Conflict and Health, 6(1), 1-8. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-1505-6-10
Bernardo, M. A., & Baranovich, D.-L. (2014). Higher education in the heart of conflict: The pivotal role of student affairs. International Journal of Educational Development, 35, 78-85. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2012.08.007
*Betancourt, T. S., McBain, R., Newnham, E. A., & Brennan, R. T. (March-April, 2013). Trajectories of internalizing problems in war-affected Sierra Leone youth: Examining conflict and post conflict factors. Child Development, 84(2), 455-470. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01861.xd
*Betancourt, T. S., Meyers-Ohki, S. E., Charrow, A. P., & Tol, W. A. (March-April, 2013). Interventions for children affected by war: An ecological perspective on psychosocial support and mental health care. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 21(2), 70-91. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HRP.0b013e318283bf8f
*Bragin, M. (2012). So that our dreams will not escape us: Learning to think together in time of war. Psychoanalytic Inquiry: A Topical Journal for Mental Health Professionals, 32(2) 115-135. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2011.592740
Bragin, M., & Opiro, W. G. (2012). Making the right to education a reality for war affected children: The Northern Uganda experience. International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 9(2), 158-177. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aps.1309
*Bundervoet, T., Verwimp, P., & Akresh, R. (2009). Health and civil war in rural Burundi. The Journal of Human Resources, 44(2), 536-563. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3368/jhr.44.2.536
*Cáceres, D. C., Izquierdo, V. F., Mantilla, L., Jara, J., & Velandia, M. (2002). Perfil epidemiológico de la población desplazada por el conflict armado interno del país en un barrio de Cartgagena, Colombia 2000 [Epidemiological profile of the population displaced by the internal armed conflict of the country in a neighborhood of Cartagena, Colombia, 2000]. Biomédica, 22(Supl. 2), 425-444. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7705/biomedica.v22iSupp2.1191
*Carlton-Ford, S., & Boop, D. (2010). Civil war and life chances. A multinational study. International Sociology, 25(1), 75-97. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0268580909346707
*Carlton-Ford, S., Ender, M. G., & Tabatabai, A. (2008). Iraqi adolescents: Self-regard, self-derogation, and perceived threat in war. Journal of Adolescence, 31(1), 53-75. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2007.04.006
*Carmona, J. A., Moreno, F., & Tobón, J. F. (2012). Child soldiers in Colombia: Five views [Niños soldados en Colombia: Cinco visions]. Universitas Psychologica, 11(3)755-768. Recuperado de http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=64724634006
Cervantes, L. , & Fernández-Cano, A. (2014). Consecuencias de los conflictos armados en la educación y sus agentes: Una revisión multivocal (Tesis de Maestría) [Consequences of armed conflict in education and their agents: A multivocal reviews]. Universidad de Granada. Recuperado de http://digibug.ugr.es/bitstream/10481/32662/1/TFM_CervantesDuarte.pdf
*Chase, R., Doney, A., Sivayogan, S., Ariyaratne, V., Satkunanatagam, P., & Swaminathan, A. (October-December, 1999). Mental health initiative as peace initiatives in Sri Lankan schoolchildren affected by armed conflict. Medicine, Conflict, and Survival, 15(4), 379-390. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13623699908409479
*Corbin, J. N. (2008). Returning home: Resettlement of formerly abducted children in Northern Uganda. Disasters, 32(2), 316-335. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.2008.01042.x
*Crombach, A., Weierstall, R., Hecker, T., Schalinski, I., & Elbert, T. (2013). Social status and the desire to resort to violence: Using the example of Uganda’s former child soldiers. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 22(5), 559-575. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2013.785458
*De Castro, E., Camacho, A. Z. V., Balanon, F. A. G., & Galang, M. T. (2012). Children caught in conflicts: Assessing the psychosocial impact of armed conflict on children in the Philippines. International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 9(3), 249-265. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aps.1323
*Denov, M. (2010). Coping with the trauma of war: Former child soldiers in post-conflict Sierra Leone. International Social Work, 53(6), 791-806. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0020872809358400
*Denov, M. (2012). Child soldiers and iconography: Portrayals and (mis) representations. Children & Society, 26(4), 280-292. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2010.00347.x
*Derluyn, I., Broekaert, E., Schuylen, G., & De Temmerman, E. (2004). Post-traumatic stress in former Ugandan child soldiers. The Lancet, 363(9412), 861-863. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16212-0
*Di Maio, M., & Nandi, T. K. (2013). The effect of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict on child labor and school attendance in the West Bank. Journal of Development Economics, 100(1), 107-116. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2012.08.007
*Dickinson-Gómez, J. (2002). Growing up in guerrilla camps: The long-term impact of being a child soldiers in El Salvador´s civil war. Ethos, 30(4), 327-356. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/eth.2002.30.4.327
*Dimitry, L. (2012). A systematic review on the mental health of children and adolescents in areas of armed conflict in the Middle East. Child: care, health and development, 38(2), 153-169. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2011.01246.x
*Dyregrov, A., Gjestad, R., & Raundalen, M. (2002). Children exposed to warfare: A longitudinal study. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 15(1), 59-68. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1014335312219
*Edwards, M. J., Lustik, M., Eichelberger, M. R., Elster, E., Azarow, K., & Coppola, C. (2012). Blast injury in children: An analysis from Afghanistan and Iraq, 2002-2010. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 73(5), 1278-1283. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e318270d3ee
*Elbert, T., Schauer, M., Schauer, E., Huschka, B., Hirth, M., & Neuner, F. (2009). Trauma related impairment in children - A survey in Sri Lankan provinces affected by armed conflict. Child Abuse & Neglect, 33(4), 238-246. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.02.008
*Feldman, R., & Vengrober, A. (2011). Posttraumatic stress disorder in infants and young children exposed to war-related trauma. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 50(7), 645-658. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2011.03.001
Fernández-Cano, A., Torralbo, M., Vallejo, M., & Fernández-Guerrero, I. M. (2012). A narrative review of Greek myths as interpretative metaphors in educational research and evaluation. Educational Research Review, 7(3), 238–248. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2012.07.001
*Flink, I. J., Restrepo, M. H., Blanco, D. P., Ortegón, M. M., Enríquez, C., L., Beirens, T. M., & Raat, H. (2013). Mental health of internally displaced preschool children: A cross-sectional study conducted in Bogotá, Colombia. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 48(6), 917-926. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-012-0611-9
Freire, P. (2007). Pedagogía del oprimido [Pedagogy of the oppressed] (19a ed.). Madrid: Siglo XXI.
*Gates, S., Hegre, H., Mokleiv H., & Strand, H. (2012). Development consequences of armed conflict. World Development, 40(9), 1713-1722. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.04.031
Glasgow, J. N., & Baer, A. L. (2011). Lives beyond suffering: The child soldiers of African Wars. English Journal, 100(6), 68-77.
González L. H., & Bedmar M. (2012). Población infantil en situación de desplazamiento forzado en Colombia y sus manifiestaciones de ciudadanía [Children in situation of displacement in Colombia and its manifestations of citizenship]. Revista Paz y Conflictos, 5, 120-137. Recuperado de http://www.ugr.es/~revpaz/numeros/rpc_n5_2012_completo.pdf
*Guy, K. M. (2009). Child soldiers as zones of violence in The Democratic Republic of Congo: Three cases on medico-legal evidence of torture. Torture, 19(2), 137-144.
*Harel-Fisch, Y., Radwan, Q., Walsh, S. D., Laufer, A., Amitai, G., Fogel-Grinvald, H., & Abdeenet, Z. (2010). Psychosocial outcomes related to subjective threat from armed conflict events (STACE): Findings from the Israeli-Palestinian cross-cultural HBSC study. Child Abuse & Neglect, 34(9), 623-638. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2009.12.007
*Hernández, P., & Romero, A. (2003). Adolescent girls in Colombia’s guerrilla: An exploration into gender and trauma dynamics. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 26(1), 21-38. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J005v26n01_03
*Høiskar, A. H. (2001). Underage and under fire: An enquiry into the use of child soldiers 1994-8. Childhood, 8(3), 340-360. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0907568201008003003
*Honwana, A. (2009). Children in war: Reintegrating child soldiers. IDS Bulletin, vol. 40(1), 63-68. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2009.00010.x
Jiménez-Caballero, C. (2009). Between rationality and intuition: A social psychology approach to ex-combatant children in Colombia. IDS Bulletin, 40(3), 58-64. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2009.00039.x
*Jordans, M. J., Komproe, I. H., Tol, W. A., Kohrt, B. A., Luitel, N. P., Macy, R. D., & De Jong, J. T. (2010). Evaluation of a classroom-based psychosocial intervention in conflict-affected Nepal: A cluster randomized controlled trial. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and allie disciplines, 51(7), 818-826. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02209.x
*Jordans, M. J., Tol, W. A., Susanty, D., Ntamatumba, P., Luitel, N. P., Komproe, I. H., & De Jong, J. T. (2013). Implementation of a mental health care packaged for children in areas of armed conflict: A case study from Burundi, Indonesia, Nepal, Sri Lanka, and Sudan. PLOS Medicine, 10(1), 1-6. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001371
Kapor-Stanulovic, N. (1999). Encounter with suffering. American Psychologist, 54(11), 1020-1027. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0088215
*Kiros, G. E., & Hogan, D. P. (2001). War, famine and excess child mortality in Africa: The role of parental education. International Journal of Epidemiology, 30(3), 447-455. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/30.3.447
*Kohrt, B. A., Jordans, M. J., Tol, W. A., Speckman, R. A., Maharjan, S. M., Worthman, C. M., & Komproe, I. H. (2008). Comparison of mental health between former child soldiers and children never conscripted by armed groups in Nepal. JAMA, 300(6), 691-702. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.300.6.691
López, H., & Wodon, Q. (2005). The economic impact of armed conflict in Rwanda. Journal of African Economies, 14(4), 586-602. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jae/eji021
*Manuchehr, T. N. (2011). Education right of children during war and armed conflicts. Procedia. Social and Behavioral Science, 15, 302-305. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.090
Massad, S. G., Nieto, F. J., Palta, M., Smith, M., Clark, R., & Thabet, A. A. (2012). Nutritional status of Palestinian preschoolers in the Gaza Strip: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 11, 12-27. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-27
Mendenhal, M. A. (2014). Education sustainability in the relief-development transition: Challenges for international organizations working in countries affected by conflict. International Journal of Educational Development, 35, 67–77. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2012.08.006
*Miller, T., El-Masri, M., Allodi, F., & Qouta, S. (1999). Emotional and behavioural problems and trauma exposure of school-age Palestinian children in Gaza: Some preliminary findings. Medicine, Conflict and Survival, 15(4), 368-378. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13623699908409478
Minou, T. (2006). The possible models of creative therapies for the child victims of war and armed conflict. Asia Pacific Education Review, 7(2), 229-235. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03031546
Naciones Unidas. Asamblea General (26 de agosto de 1996). A/51/306. Promoción y proteccion de los derechos del niño. Repercusiones de los conflictos armados sobre los niños. Informe de la experta del Secretariado General, Sra. Graca Machel, presentado en virtud de la resolución 48/157 [Promotion and protection of the right of children. Repercusion of the armed conflict in children. Report prepared by General Assembly expert Ms. Graça Machel, and presented in virtue of the 48/157 resolution]. Retrieved from http://www.bienestaryproteccioninfantil.es/imagenes/tablaContenidos03SubSec/opendocpdf.pdf
Naciones Unidas. Asamblea General. (2013). Los niños y los conflictos armados (Informe del Secretario General A/67/845-S/2013/245 [Children and armed conflict. Report of the General Secretary a/67/845-S/2013/245]. Retrieved from http://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/N1331170.pdf
*Nelson, B. D., Collins, L., VanRooyen, M. J., Joyce, N., Mukwege, D., & Bartels, S. (2011). Impact of sexual violence on children in the Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. Medicine, Conflict, and Survival, 27(4), 211-225. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13623699.2011.645148
*Noguera, R. T. (2013). The narratives of children in armed conflict: An inference to spirituality and implication to psychological intervention. International Journal of Childre’s Spirituality, 18(2), 162-172. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1364436X.2012.755954
Ogawa, R. T., & Malen, B. (1991). Towards rigor in reviews of multivocal literatures: Applying the exploratory case study method. Review of Educacional Research, 61(3), 265-286. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543061003265
*O’Hare, B. A. M., & Southall, D. P. (2007). First do no harm: The impact of recent armed conflict on maternal and child health in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 100(12), 564-570. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1258/jrsm.100.12.564
OTR/PRESS (13 de Noviembre de 2008). Supuestos talibanes atacan con ácido a un grupo de niñas por ir al colegio [Alleged Taliban attack with acid at a group of girls in their way at school]. El Confidencial. Retrieved from http://www.elconfidencial.com/cache/2008/11/13/mundo_32_supuestos_talibanes_atacan_acido_grupo_ninas_colegio.html
Pedersen, J., & Sommerfelt, T. (2007). Studying children in armed conflict: Data production, social indicators and analysis. Social Indicators Research, 84(3), 251-269. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9117-3
*Peltonen, K., Qouta, S., El Sarraj, E., & Punamäki, R-L. (2012). Effectiveness of school-based intervention in enhancing mental health and social functioning among war-affected children. Traumatology, 18(4), 37-46. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1534765612437380
*Poirier, T. (2012). The effects of armed conflict on schooling in Sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Educational Development, 31(2), 341-351. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2011.06.001
*Prior, M., Virasinghe, S., & Smart, D. (2005). Behavioural problems in Sri Lanka schoolchildren: Associations with socio-economic status, age, gender, academic progress, ethnicity and religion. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 40(8), 654-662. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-005-0942-x
*Rashid, J. (2012). An analysis of self-accounts of children-in-conflict-with-law in Kashmir concerning the impact of the torture and detention on their live. International Social Work, 55(5) 629-644. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0020872812447640
Ressler, E. M., Tortorici, J. M., & Marcelino, A. (1993). Children in war: A guide to the provision of services. A study for UNICEF. Toledo, OH: Unicef. Retrieved from http://repository.forcedmigration.org/show_metadata.jsp?pid=fmo:5191
Rieder, M., & Choonara, I. (2012). Armed conflict and child health. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 97(1), 59-62. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/adc.2009.178186
*Rodríguez, C., & Sánchez, F. (2012). Armed conflict exposure, human capital investments and child labor: Evidence from Colombia. Defence and Peace Economics, 23(2), 161-184. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2011.597239
Rojas, E. (2011) La ilusión de vivir. Instrucciones para navegar hacia la felicidad [The eagerness of live. Instructions for sailing to hapiness]. Barcelona: Planeta.
*Shakya, A. (2011). Experiences of children in armed conflict in Nepal. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(4), 557-563. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.08.018
*Shemyakina, O. (2011). The effect of armed conflict on accumulation of schooling: Results from Tajikistan. Journal of Development Economics, 95(2), 186-200. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2010.05.002
*Southall, D. (2011). Armed conflict women and girls who are pregnant, infants and children; A neglected public health Challenge. What can health professionals do? Early Human Development, 87(11), 735-742. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2011.08.020
*Spellings, C. R. (2008). Scratching the surface: A comparison of girl soldiers from three Geographic regions of the World. International Education, 38(1), 21-39.
Spitzer, H., & Twikirize, J. M. (2012). War-affected children in Northern Uganda: No easy path to normality. International Social Work, 56(1), 67-79. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0020872812459067
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). (2013). Yearbook, 2013: Armaments, disarmaments and international security. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://www.sipri.org/yearbook/2013
*Tatar, M., & Horenczyk, G. (2003). Dilemmas and strategies in the counselling of Jewish and Palestinian Arab children in Israeli school. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 31(4), 375-391. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03069880310001609268
*Thapa, S. B., & Hauff, E. (2012). Perceived needs, self-reported health and disability among displaced persons during an armed conflict in Nepal. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 47(4), 589-595. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-011-0359-7
The National Child Traumatic Stress Network (NCTSN). (2005). Mental health interventions for refugee children in resettlement. White Paper II. Chicago, IL: Heartland Health Outreach. Retrieved from http://www.nctsnet.org/nctsn_assets/pdfs/promising_practices/MH_Interventions_for_Refugee_Children.pdf
*Tol, W. A., Komproe, I. H., Jordans, M. J., Vallipuram, A., Sipsma, H., Sivayokan, S., Macy, R. D., & De Jong, J. T. (2012). Outcomes and moderators of a preventive school-based mental health intervention for children affected by war in Sri Lanka: A cluster randomized trial. World Psychiatry, 11(2) 114-122. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wpsyc.2012.05.008
*Tol, W. A., Song, S., & Jordans, M. J. (2013). Annual research review: Resilience and mental health in children and adolescents living in areas of armed conflict - a systematic review of findings in low - and middle -income countries. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and allied disciplines, 54(4), 445-460. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12053
Torres, R. M. (2013). Six ‘Education for All’ goals. Retrieved from http://otra-educacion.blogspot.com.es/2013/01/six-education-for-all-goals-seis-metas.html
Unesco. (2007). La educación victima de la violencia armada [Armed violence victim´s education]. París: Autor. Recuperado de http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0015/001505/150548s.pdf
Unesco. (2010). Education under attack. Paris: Autor. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0018/001868/186809e.pdf
Unesco. (2011). Una crisis encubierta: Conflictos armados y educación. Informe de seguimiento de la EPT en el mundo. [Covertly crisis: armed conflicto and education. EFA Monitoring report in the world]. Paris: Autor Retrieved from http://www.cme-espana.org/sites/default/files/informeept_2011.pdf
Unesco (2014). Progress in getting all children to school stalls but some countries show the way forward. Policy paper 14. Fact sheet 18. France: Author. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0022/002281/228184E.pdf
Unesco. (2015). La educación para todos, 2000-2015. Logros y desafíos. Infome de seguimiento de la EPT en el mundo 2015. [Education for all, 2000-2015. Achievements and challenge. EFA Monitoring report in the world in 2015] Paris: Autor. Recuperado de http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002324/232435s.pdf
Unesco, Instituto for Statistics y Unicef (2015). Fixing the broken promise of education for all. Findings from the global initiative on out-of-school children. Montreal: UIS. Retrieved from http://www.unicef.org/education/files/allinschool.org_wp-content_uploads_2015_01_Fixing-the-Broken-Promise-of-Education-For-All-full-report.pdf
Unicef (2014). El estado mundial de la infancia en 2014 en cifras. Todos los niños y niñas cuentan. [The state of the world’s children 2014 in numbers. Every child counts]. New York: Autor. Retrieved from http://www.unicef.es/sites/www.unicef.es/files/emi_2014_0.pdf
Unicef . (2015). Education under fire. How conflict in the Middle East is depriving children of their schooling. Jordan: Autor. Retrieved from http://www.unicef.org/mena/Education_Under_Fire.pdf
*Vindevogel, S., Coppens, K., Derluyn, I., De Schryver, M., Loots, G., & Broekaert, E. (2011). Forced conscription of children during armed conflict: Experiences of former child soldiers in Northern Uganda. Child Abuse & Neglect, 35(7), 551-562. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.03.011
*Winthrop, R., & Kirk, J. (2008). Learning for a bright future: Schooling, armed conflict, and children’s well-being. Comparative Education Review, 52(4), 639-661. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/591301
*Zahr, L. K. (1996). Effects of war on the behavior of Lebanese preschool children: Influence of home environment and family functioning. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 66(3), 401-408. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0080190
1 Diploma in Early Childhood Education Teaching. Licenced in Psychopedagogy. Masters in Psychopedagogical Intervention, from the University of Granada. Her interest areas are qualitative methodologies and resolution of conflicts.
2 Doctor in Philosophy and Educational Sciences. Professor-chairman at the University of Granada. His interest areas are the methodologies for research and evaluation in Education, mixed methods and the impact of educational research.
3 Secondary analyses (SA) are studies carried out from data which is already available, that data having been compiled by other researchers in primary studies, and which are often available in databases.