Diagnosis of critical thinking of elementary school students in Chimbote, Peru
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.25-1.15Keywords:
Critical thinking, children, dialogical dimension, substantive dimension, educational institutionsAbstract
Objective. To determine the level of development of the critical thinking of the students of the Educational Institutions of primary education of Chimbote. Materials and methods. A descriptive study was carried out in Chimbote, 2016. Critical thinking was evaluated in 250 boys and girls who belong to the sixth grade of primary education in 2016. A questionnaire of 30 questions aimed at addressing the dialogic and substantive dimensions was applied; each question included 5 response options on the Likert scale (1 = total disagreement up to 5 = total agreement). These variables were re-categorized by scaling by percentiles classified into three categories: (a) high, between 150-100 points; (b) medium, between 99-50; and (c) low, between 49-0 points. A descriptive analysis of the critical thinking variable was carried out according to its substantive and dialogic dimensions through tables with their relative and absolute frequencies. Results. There is a negative tendency in the development of critical thinking which is integrated the dimensions of substantive and dialogical, being the lowest level the one that obtained the highest percentage with 54% compared to the high level with 4.4%. Conclusion. There is a deficit of critical thinking in student body students and in for their substantive and dialogical dimensions.
References
Bezanilla Albisua, M. J., Poblete Ruiz, M., Fernández Nogueira, D., Arranz Turnes, S. y Campo Carrasco, L. (2018). El pensamiento crítico desde la perspectiva de los docentes universitarios. Estudios Pedagógicos 44(1), 89-113. https://scielo.conicyt.cl/pdf/estped/v44n1/0718-0705-estped-44-01-00089.pdf
Díaz-Larenas, C. H., Ossa-Cornejo, C. J., Palma-Luengo, M. R., Lagos-San Martín, N. G. y Boudon Araneda, J. I. (2019). El concepto de pensamiento crítico según estudiantes chilenos de pedagogía. Sophia, 27, 267-288. http://scielo.senescyt.gob.ec/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1390-86262019000200275#ref1
Hernández Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, C. y Baptista Lucio, M. (2014). Metodología de la Investigación (6.a ed.). Interamericana editores.
López Aymes, G. (2012). Pensamiento critico en el aula. Docencia e Investigación, 37(22), 41-60. http://educacion.to.uclm.es/pdf/revistaDI/3_22_2012.pdf
Marciales Vivas, G. P. (2003). Pensamiento crítico: Diferencias en estudiantes universitarios en el tipo de crrencias, estrategias e inferencias en la lectura crítica de textos [Tesis doctoral]. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/19709382.pdf
Milla Virhuez, M. R. (2012). Pensamiento crítico en estudiantes de quinto de secundaria de los colegios de Carmen de la Legua Callao [Tesis de maestría]. Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, Perú. http://repositorio.usil.edu.pe/bitstream/123456789/1217/1/2012_Milla_Pensamiento_cr%C3%ADtico_en_estudiantes_de_quinto_de_secundaria.pdf
Ministerio de Educación. (2006). Guía para el desarrollo del pensamiento crítico. Autor. http://es.slideshare.net/centropoblado3/gua-para-el-desarrollo-del-pensamiento-crtico-minedu
Ministerio de Educación. (2015a). Evaluación PISA 2015. http://umc.minedu.gob.pe/resultados-de-evaluacion-pisa-2015/
Ministerio de Educación. (2015b). Rutas de aprendizaje. http://www.minedu.gob.pe/rutas-del-aprendizaje/primaria.php
Ministerio de Educación. (2016a). Currículo nacional de la educación básica. http://www.minedu.gob.pe/curriculo/pdf/curriculo-nacional-2016-2.pdf
Ministerio de Educación. (2016b). Resultados de la evaluación censal de estudiantes. ECE 2016. Autor. http://umc.minedu.gob.pe/evaluacion-censal-de-estudiantes-2016/
Nosich, G. M. (2003). Aprender a pensar. Pensamiento analítico para estudiantes. Pearson Educación.
Paul, R. y Elder, L. (2003) La mini-guía para el pensamiento crítico. Conceptos y herramientas. Fundación para el pensamiento crítico. https://www.criticalthinking.org/resources/PDF/SP-ConceptsandTools.pdf
Prado Coronado, M. V. (2019). El pensamiento critico y su relación con el aprendizaje autónomo de los alumnos del 5to. de secundaria de la Red 03 de La Perla – Callao [Tesis Doctoral]. Universidad Nacional de Educación Enrique Guzmán y Valle, Lima, Perú. http://repositorio.une.edu.pe/handle/UNE/3888
Solé, I., Mateos, M., Miras, M., Martín, E., Castells, N., Cuevas, I. y Gràcia, M. (2005). Lectura, escritura y adquisición de conocimientos en educación secundaria y Educación Universitaria. Journal for the Study of Education and Development. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 28(3), 329-347. https://doi.org/10.1174/0210370054740241
Tamayo, O. E., Zona, R. y Zoaiza, Y. E. (2015). El pensamiento crítico en la eduacción. Algunas categorías centrales en su estudio. Revista Latinoamericna de Estudios Educativos, 11(2), 111-133. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/1341/134146842006.pdf
Villa, A. y Poblete, M. (Dirs.). (2007). Aprendizaje basado en competencias. Una propuesta para la evaluación de las competencias genéricas. https://investigacion.udgvirtual.udg.mx/personal/jdelgado/personal_page/lirbos_Chan/Aprendizaje%20Basado%20en%20Competencias.pdf
Yubero Jiménez, S. y Larrañaga Rubio, E. (2010). El valor de la lectura en relación con el comportamiento lector. Un estudio sobre los hábitos lectores y el estilo de vida en niños. Ocnos: Revista de Estudios Sobre Lectura, 6, 7-20. https://doi.org/10.18239/ocnos_2010.06.01
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
1. In case the submitted paper is accepted for publication, the author(s) FREELY, COSTLESS, EXCLUSIVELY AND FOR AN INDEFINITE TERM transfer copyrights and patrimonial rights to Universidad Nacional (UNA, Costa Rica). For more details check the Originality Statement and Copyright Transfer Agreement
2. REUTILIZATION RIGHTS: UNA authorizes authors to use, for any purpose (among them selfarchiving or autoarchiving) and to publish in the Internet in any electronic site, the paper´'s final version, both approved and published (post print), as long as it is done with a non commercial purpose, does not generate derivates without previous consentment and recognizes both publisher's name and authorship.
3. The submission and possible publication of the paper in the Educare Electronic Journal is ruled by the Journal’s editorial policies, the institutional rules of Universidad Nacional and the laws of the Republic of Costa Rica. Additionally, any possible difference of opinion or future dispute shall be settled in accordance with the mechanisms of Alternative Dispute Resolution and the Costa Rican Jurisdiction.
4. In all cases, it is understood that the opinions issued are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position and opinion of Educare, CIDE or Universidad Nacional, Costa Rica. It is also understood that, in the exercise of academic freedom, the authors have carried out a rogorous scientific-academic process of research, reflection and argumentation thar lays within the thematic scope of interest of the Journal.
5. The papers published by Educare Electronic Journal use a Creative Commons License: