Developing Visible Thinking and Motivation Through the Curricular Design of an Escape Room in Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.25-3.27Keywords:
Escape Room, higher education, educational innovation, motivation, thinkingAbstract
Introduction. The term escape room has undergone a notable evolution in recent years, extending its presence to areas not only recreational but also business or educational. The defining traits (overcoming obstacles, problem-solving, teamwork, time management...) have proven to be valid in business and education. This study presents the pedagogical design of an escape room based on visible thinking and analyses its effect on the motivation and cognitive processes of higher education students. Method. For this purpose, a quasi-experimental research with pretest/post-test was conducted, and it was evaluated whether the instructional design of the escape room was adequate to enhance the learning of the 238 students, whether it was motivating, and whether it contributed to the development of cognitive processes. We used two structured questionnaires with multiple-choice questions and one questionnaire with open-ended questions. We also applied a mixed method for quantitative and qualitative data collection and analysis. Results. The results show that the students consider the characteristics of the escape room and the organization of its elements to be of high quality; they also show that the curricular design of the escape room enhances students’ learning. In particular, the students consider that they have developed group thinking, critical thinking, and the activation of prior knowledge through the escape room and have found it a motivating experience. Conclusions. The use of the escape room in educational environments has a high educational potential. This is not only because it encourages the development of higher-order cognitive processes but also because it contributes to teamwork, self-regulation, and student motivation. However, it must be designed as a significant part of the didactic program, taking special care in the development of competences and thinking.
References
Andrade-Abarca, P. S., Ramón-Jaramillo, L. N., & Loaiza-Aguirre, M. I. (2018). Aplicación del SEEQ como instrumento para evaluar la actividad docente universitaria. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 36(1), 259-275. https://doi.org/10.6018/rie.36.1.260741
Ato, M., López, J. J., &Benavente, A. (2013). Un sistema de clasificación de los diseños de investigación en psicología. Anales de Psicología, 29(3), 1038-1059. https://revistas.um.es/analesps/article/view/analesps.29.3.178511/152221
Borrego, C., Fernández, C., Blanes, I., & Robles, S. (2017). Room escape at class: Escape games activities to facilitate the motivation and learning in computer science. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 7(2), 162-171. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.247
Byrd, C. M. (2016). Facilitating team-building sessions: A guide for escape room and exit Game owners. CreateSpace Independen Pulishing Platform. https://amz.run/3qLp
Clare, A. (2015). Escape the Game: How to Make Puzzle and Escape Rooms. Wero Creative Press.
Clarke, S., Peel, D. J., Arnab, S., Morini, L., Keegan, H., & Wood, O. (2017). EscapED: A Framework for Creating Educational Escape Rooms and Interactive Games to For Higher/Further Education. International Journal of Serious Games, 4(3), 73-86. https://dx.doi.org/10.17083/ijsg.v4i3.180
Connolly, T. M. (Ed.). (2013). Psychology, Pedagogy, and Assessment in Serious Games. IGI Global.
Contreras Espinosa, R.S., & Eguía Gómez, J. L. (2017). Gamification en educación: Diseñando un curso para diseñadores de juegos. Revista KEPES, 14(16), 91-120. 10.17151/kepes.2017.14.16.5
De Bono, E. (1985). Six thinking hats: An essential approach to business management from the creator of lateral thinking. Little Brown and Company.
Gómez-Urquiza, J. L., Gómez-Salgado, J., Albendín-García, L., Correa-Rodríguez, M., González-Jiménez, E., & Cañadas-de la Fuente, G. A. (2018). The impact on nursing students’ opinions and motivation of using a “Nursing Escape Room’ as a teaching game: A descriptive study. Nurse education today, 72, 73-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.10.018
Gunawardena, M, & Wilson, K. (2021). Scaffolding students’ critical thinking: A process, not an end game. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100848
Hermanns, M., Deal, B., Campbell, A. M., Hillhouse, S., Opella, J. B., Faigle, C., & Campbell, R. H. (2018). Using an "Escape Room" toolbox approach to enhance pharmacology education. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 8(4), 89-95. https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v8n4p89
Johnson, H. E. (2017). Breaking Into Breakout Boxes: Escape Rooms in Education. https://amz.run/3qLy
Kalugin, V. (2019). An ideal escape room: Tips for creating games for novice owners escape rooms. https://amz.run/3ruy
Kapp, K. M. (2012). The gamification of learning and instruction: Game-based methods and strategies for training and education. John Wiley & Sons.
Kinio, A. E., Dufresne, L., Brandys, T., & Jetty, P. (2019). Break out of the Classroom: The use of Escape Rooms as an Alternative Teaching Strategy in Surgical Education. Journal of Surgical Education, 76(1), 134-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.06.030
Kroski, E. (2019). Escape Rooms and Other Immersive Experiences in the Library. American Library Association.
Malliarakis, C., Satratzemi , M., &Xinogalos, S. (2014). Designing educational games for computer programming: A holistic framework. EJEL. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 12(3), 281-181. https://academic-publishing.org/index.php/ejel/article/view/1699/1662
Marsh, H. W. (1982). SEEQ: A reliable, valid, and useful instrument for collecting students’ evaluations of university teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 52(1), 77-95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1982.tb02505.x
Meehan, J. (2019). EDrenaline Rush: Game-changing Student Engagement Inspired by Theme Parks, Mud Runs, and Escape Rooms. Dave Burgess Consulting. https://amz.run/3qPQ
Melendez, S. (2015). How to Design an Escape Room. Fast Company [website]. https://bityl.co/44Gh
Ndulue, U., Peréa, F. C., Kayou, B., & Martinez, L. S. (2012). Team-building activities as strategies for improving community-university partnerships: Lessons learned from Nuestro Futuro Saludable. Progres Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Acticion, 6(2): 213-218. https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2012.0030
Nicholson, S. (2013). Exploring Gamification Techniques for Classroom Management, Paper Presented at Games Learning Society 9.0 [Preprint]. Madison, Wisconsin. http://scottnicholson.com/pubs/gamificationtechniquesclassroom.pdf
Nowco, E. (2016). Escape Room Rules. How to Create an Amazing Game. https://amz.run/3qM0
Pedersen, F. (2016). 101 best escape room puzzle ideas. Now escape [blog]. https://bityl.co/44GZ
Rapp, A., Hopfgartner, F., Hamari, J., Linehan, C., &Cena, F. (2019). Strengthening gamification studies: Current trends and future opportunities of gamification research. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 127, 1-6. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328944804_Strengthening_gamification_studies_Current_trends_and_future_opportunities_of_gamification_research
Ritchhart, R. (2002). Intellectual character: What it is, why it matters, and how to get it. Jossey-Bass. https://amz.run/4kTT
Ritchhart, R. (2015). Creating cultures of thinking: The 8 forces we must master to truly transform our schools. Jossey-Bass. https://amz.run/4kTS
Ritchhart, R., & Church, M. (2020). The power of making thinking visible: Practices to engage and empower all learners. Jossey-Bass.
Ritchhart, R., Church, M., & Morrison, K. (2011). Making thinking visible. How to promote engagement, understanding, and independence for all learnes. Jossey-Bass.
Salmon, A. K., & Barrera, M. X. (2021). What are you thinking? Scaffolding thinking to promote learning. Young Children, 76(2), 59-63. https://www.naeyc.org/resources/pubs/yc/summer2021/scaffolding-thinking-promote-learning
Sierra Daza, M. C., & Fernández-Sánchez, M. R. (2019). Gamificando el aula universitaria. Análisis de una experiencia de Escape Room en educación superior. Revista de Estudios y Experiencias en Educación, 18(36), 105-115. https://doi.org/10.21703/rexe.20191836sierra15
Swartz, R. J., & Parks, S. (1994). Infusing the teaching of critical and creative thinking into content instruction: A lesson design handbook for the elementary grades. Critical Thinking Press and Software.
Swartz, R., & Perkins, D. N. (1990). Teaching thinking: Issues and approaches. Revised edition. The practitioners' guide to yeaching thinking series. Midwest Publications Critical Thinking Press and Software.
Tishman, S., & Andrade, A. (1995). Thinking dispositions: A review of current theories, practices, and issues. Harvard University.
Vörös, A. I. V., & Sárközi, Z. (2017). Physics escape room as an educational tool. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1916(1), 050002-1-050002-6. AIP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5017455
Wiemker, M., Elumir, E., & Clare, A. (2015). Escape Room Games. “Can you transform an unpleasant situation into a pleasant one?”. https://bityl.co/44F0
Zhang, X. C., Lee, H., Rodriguez, C., Rudner, J., Chan, T. M., & Papanagnou, D. (2018). Trapped as a Group, Escape as a Team: Applying Gamification to Incorporate Team-building Skills Through an ‘Escape Room’ Experience. Cureus, 10(3), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.2256
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
1. In case the submitted paper is accepted for publication, the author(s) FREELY, COSTLESS, EXCLUSIVELY AND FOR AN INDEFINITE TERM transfer copyrights and patrimonial rights to Universidad Nacional (UNA, Costa Rica). For more details check the Originality Statement and Copyright Transfer Agreement
2. REUTILIZATION RIGHTS: UNA authorizes authors to use, for any purpose (among them selfarchiving or autoarchiving) and to publish in the Internet in any electronic site, the paper´'s final version, both approved and published (post print), as long as it is done with a non commercial purpose, does not generate derivates without previous consentment and recognizes both publisher's name and authorship.
3. The submission and possible publication of the paper in the Educare Electronic Journal is ruled by the Journal’s editorial policies, the institutional rules of Universidad Nacional and the laws of the Republic of Costa Rica. Additionally, any possible difference of opinion or future dispute shall be settled in accordance with the mechanisms of Alternative Dispute Resolution and the Costa Rican Jurisdiction.
4. In all cases, it is understood that the opinions issued are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position and opinion of Educare, CIDE or Universidad Nacional, Costa Rica. It is also understood that, in the exercise of academic freedom, the authors have carried out a rogorous scientific-academic process of research, reflection and argumentation thar lays within the thematic scope of interest of the Journal.
5. The papers published by Educare Electronic Journal use a Creative Commons License:
The articles published by Educare Electronic Journal can be shared with a Creative Commons License: 
