Profiles of Higher Education Students Adopting Microlearning Strategies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.27-2.17196Keywords:
higher education, microlearning, learning strategy, virtual educationAbstract
Introduction. Microlearning is the practice of using brief, fragmented, digital, and preferably mobile educational content for learning purposes. These elements coincide with young people’s practices regarding media consumption and digital resource usage. Various factors affect the adoption of microlearning, including the strategies that, as study actions, are adjusted to this practice. Objective. This research study aimed to analyze microlearning strategies to establish university students’ profiles and characterize them based on their technological affinity, motivation for learning objects, and perceived usefulness in educational platforms. Methodology. A quantitative approach was used with a non-experimental and cross-sectional design employing a digital questionnaire (n=1122). A k-means cluster analysis was applied. Results. Two groups of students were identified: “Favorable” (78%) and “Not Defined” (22%). The Favorable profile presented a higher level of technological affinity, perceived greater usefulness of educational platforms, and more motivation for learning matters. Students with favorable microlearning strategies viewed education with technology more positively and considered it essential to use technology in their lives. Working activity was a distinguishing characteristic of this group. Conclusions. It is concluded that university students presented heterogeneous actions to approach learning with technology. The majority of students (Favorable group) are more inclined towards technology usage and report actions consistent with microlearning, which supports the importance of promoting innovation in universities’ virtual spaces.
References
Ahmad, N. (2017). Video podcast as a micro-learning tool in a blended learning environment. E-Leader, 12(1), 1-7. http://www.g-casa.com/conferences/macau/pdf_paper/Ahmad%20-%20Video%20Podcasts.pdf
Barradas-Gudiño, J. (2020). Microlearning como herramienta de entrenamiento tecnológico del docente universitario. Revista Internacional Tecnológica-Educativa Docentes 2.0, 8(2), 28-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.37843/rted.v8i2.172
Brandenburg, D. C. & Ellinger, A. D. (2003). The future: Just-in-time learning expectations and potential implications for human resource development. Advances in developing human resources, 5(3), 308-320.
Bryant, P. (2017, 11-13 de diciembre). It doesn’t matter what is in their hands: understanding how students use technology to support, enhance and expand their learning in a complex world. International Conference Educational Technologies (pp. 67-74). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED579299
Cabero-Almenara, J., Arancibia, M. L., & Del Prete, A. (2019). Technical and didactic knowledge of the Moodle LMS in higher education. Beyond functional use. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 8(1), 25-33. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2019.1.327
Casillas Alvarado, M. A., Ramírez Martinell, A., & Ortega Guerrero, J. C. (2016). Afinidad tecnológica de los estudiantes universitarios. Innovación educativa, 16(70), 151-175. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1665-26732016000100151
Chiecher Costa, A. C. & Lorenzati Blengino, K. P. (2017). Estudiantes y tecnologías. Una visión desde la ‘lente’ de docentes universitarios. RIED Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 20(1), 261-282. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.20.1.16334
Chung, C. & Ackerman, D. (2015). Student reactions to classroom management technology: Learning styles and attitudes toward Moodle. Journal of Education for Business, 90(4), 217-223. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2015.1019818
Climént Bonilla, J. B. (2018). Factores adversos al fomento de hábitos de estudio y aprendizaje en educación superior: Un estudio de caso. Actualidades Investigativas en Educación, 18(3), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.15517/aie.v18i3.34122
De Gagne, J. C., Woodward, A., Park, H. K., Sun, H., & Yamane, S. S. (2019). Microlearning in health professions education: a scoping review protocol. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 17(6), 1018-1025. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003884
Flores Cortés, G., Hadermann Bofill, C. G., & Osorio Rivera, M. (2020). ¿Qué constituye el aprendizaje combinado? Principios y desafíos para el desarrollo de un modelo de aprendizaje-enseñanza con integración de tecnología (TI). Trilogía, 32(43), 22-34. https://repositorio.utem.cl/handle/30081993/1136
Hair, J. F., Jr., Celsi, M. W., Money, A. H., Samouel, P., & Page, M. J. (2016). Essentials of business research methods. Routledge.
Hanshaw, G. O. & Hanson, J. (2019). Using microlearning and social learning to improve teachers’ instructional design skills: A mixed methods study of technology integration in teacher professional development. International Journal of Learning and Development, 9(1), 145-173. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijld.v9i1.13713
Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., & Aston, R. (2017). What works and why? Student perceptions of ‘useful’ digital technology in university teaching and learning. Studies in Higher Education, 42(8), 1567-1579. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1007946
Hierdeis, H. (2007). From meno to microlearning: A historical survey. En T. Hug (Ed.), Didactics of microlearning. Concepts, discourses and examples (pp. 35-52). Waxmann.
Horst, R. & Dörner, R. (2019). Mining virtual reality nuggets: A pattern-based approach for creating virtual reality content based on microlearning methodology. En IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Education (TALE) (pp. 1-8). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE48000.2019.9225867
Hug, T. (2005). Micro learning and narration. Exploring possibilities of utilization of narrations and storytelling for the designing of “micro units” and didactical micro-learning arrangements. En fourth Media in Transition conference (pp. 1-13). MiT4. http://web.mit.edu/comm-forum/legacy/mit4/papers/hug.pdf
Hug, T. (2012). Microlearning. En N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning (pp. 2268-2271). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_1583
Jin, D. Y. (2019). Snack culture’s dream of big-screen culture: Korean webtoons’ yransmedia storytelling. International Journal of Communication, 13, 2094-2115. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/10004
Keller, J. M. (2009). Motivational design for learning and performance: The ARCS model approach. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1250-3
Luján-García, C. & García-Sánchez, S. (2015). Moodle as a useful pervasive learning environment. Calidoscopio, 13(3), 376-387. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=571561401015
Luo, J., Sun, M., Yeung, P.-S., & Li, H. (2018). Development and validation of a scale to measure media multitasking among adolescents: Results from China. Children and Youth Services Review, 95, 377-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.10.044
Mayer, R. E. (1988). Learning Strategies: An overview. En C. E. Weinstein, E. T. Goetz, & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Learning and study Strategies: Issues in Assessment, Instruction, and Evaluation (pp. 11-22). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-742460-6.50008-6
Mehrvarz, M., Heidari, E., Farrokhnia, M., & Noroozi, O. (2021). The mediating role of digital informal learning in the relationship between students’ digital competence and their academic performance. Computers & Education, 167(2), Article 104184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104184
Méndez Martínez, C. & Rondón Sepúlveda, M. A. (2012). Introducción al análisis factorial exploratorio. Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría, 41(1), 197-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-7450(14)60077-9
Salinas, J. & Marín, V. I. (2014). Pasado, presente y futuro del microlearning como estrategia para el desarrollo profesional. Campus Virtuales, 3(2), 46-61. http://rabida.uhu.es/dspace/bitstream/handle/10272/17369/Pasado.pdf?sequence=2
Scherer, F. & Scherer, M. (2007). How “Micro” can learning be? A neuropsychological perspective on microlearning. En T. Hug (Ed.), Didactics of microlearning. Concepts, discourses and examples (pp. 110-124). Waxmann.
Sein-Echaluce, M., Fidalgo-Blanco, Á., & Alves, G. (2017). Technology behaviors in education innovation. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 596-598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.049
Sun G., Cui, T., Guo, W., Beydoun, G., Xu, D., & Shen, J. (2015). Micro learning adaptation in MOOC: A software as a service and a personalized learner model. En F. W. B., Li, R. Klamma, M. Laanpere, J. Zhang, B. Fernández Manjón, & R. W. H. Lau (Eds.), Advances in Web-Based Learning - ICWL. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 174-184). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25515-6_16
World Innovation Summit for Education [WISE]. (2020). WISE global education barometer: Youth perceptions on their education and their future. https://www.wise-qatar.org/app/uploads/2020/01/wise19_etude_en_papier_210120_web_final.pdf
Zhao, Y., Pinto Llorente, A. M., & Sánchez Gómez, M. C. (2021). Digital competence in higher education research: A systematic literature review. Computers & Education, 168, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104212
Zhou, N. & Deng, Y. (2018). Research and practice on the Flipped Classroom teaching mode in “Microcomputer Principle and Interface Technology” Course Based on the micro learning resources. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 8(3), 240-244. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2018.8.3.1041
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
1. In case the submitted paper is accepted for publication, the author(s) FREELY, COSTLESS, EXCLUSIVELY AND FOR AN INDEFINITE TERM transfer copyrights and patrimonial rights to Universidad Nacional (UNA, Costa Rica). For more details check the Originality Statement and Copyright Transfer Agreement
2. REUTILIZATION RIGHTS: UNA authorizes authors to use, for any purpose (among them selfarchiving or autoarchiving) and to publish in the Internet in any electronic site, the paper´'s final version, both approved and published (post print), as long as it is done with a non commercial purpose, does not generate derivates without previous consentment and recognizes both publisher's name and authorship.
3. The submission and possible publication of the paper in the Educare Electronic Journal is ruled by the Journal’s editorial policies, the institutional rules of Universidad Nacional and the laws of the Republic of Costa Rica. Additionally, any possible difference of opinion or future dispute shall be settled in accordance with the mechanisms of Alternative Dispute Resolution and the Costa Rican Jurisdiction.
4. In all cases, it is understood that the opinions issued are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position and opinion of Educare, CIDE or Universidad Nacional, Costa Rica. It is also understood that, in the exercise of academic freedom, the authors have carried out a rogorous scientific-academic process of research, reflection and argumentation thar lays within the thematic scope of interest of the Journal.
5. The papers published by Educare Electronic Journal use a Creative Commons License:
The articles published by Educare Electronic Journal can be shared with a Creative Commons License: 
