Social Imaginaries of Childhood and Nursery School in Contemporary Society
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.28-2.18436Keywords:
Childhood, early childhood education, early schooling, social imaginary, Quality EducationAbstract
Purpose. This scientific article presents a qualitative project aimed to critically analyse the collective imaginaries of childhood and nursery school held by three generations of children. Method. The research, framed within the qualitative-interpretative paradigm, used 45 semi-structured interviews with participants organised into three age groups (15-24, 25-54, and over 55) who were not professionally affiliated with the school. Findings. The study reveals the following key findings: a limiting vision of childhood, crossed by notions of innocence and vulnerability (particularly in older participants) and propaedeutic. An essentialist vision is less prevalent, especially among men. Likewise, in relation to school, the functions of assistance, protection and care (more present in men), and preparation, both academic (among younger participants) and social (among older participants), are dominant. Finally, the majority of participants identified age two as the optimal age to begin early childhood education. Conclusions. The study concludes by emphasizing the need for educational policies prioritizing equity and children’s rights, recognizing that policies of the facts are those that encourage transformations in social imaginaries.
References
Alfageme, E., Cantos, R., & Martínez, M. (2003). De la participación al protagonismo infantil. Propuestas para la acción. Plataforma de Organizaciones de Infancia. https://www.plataformadeinfancia.org/documento/de-la-participacion-al-protagonismo-infantil-propuestas-para-la-accion/
Cagliari, P., Barozzi, A., & Giudici, C. (2004). Thoughts, theories, and experiences: For an educational project with participation. Children in Europe, 6, 28-30.
Casas, F. (2010). Representaciones sociales que influyen en las políticas sociales de infancia y adolescencia en Europa. Pedagogía Social. Revista Interuniversitaria, (17), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.7179/PSRI_2010.17.02
Dahlberg, G., Moss, P., & Pence, A. (2013). Beyond quality in early childhood education and care: Languages of evaluation. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203371114
Durkheim, É. (1975). Educación y sociología. Ediciones Península.
Fenech, M., Harrison, L. J., Press, F., & Sumsion, J. (2020). Using metaphor to illuminate quality in early childhood education. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 45(2), 197-210. https://doi.org/10.1177/1836939120918482
Ferrer, Á. (2019). Donde todo empieza. Educación infantil de 0 a 3 años para igualar oportunidades. Save the Children España. https://www.plataformadeinfancia.org/documento/save-the-children-donde-todo-empieza-educacion-infantil-de-0-a-3-anos-para-igualar-oportunidades/
Fielding, M. (2011). La voz del alumnado y la inclusión educativa: Una aproximación democrática radical para el aprendizaje intergeneracional. Revista Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 70(25,1), 31-61. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=27419147003
Flick, U. (2018). Designing qualitative research. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529622737
Guttman, A. (2006). La educación democrática. Una teoría política de la educación. Paidós.
Hammersley, M. & Atkinson, P. (1994). Etnografía. Métodos de investigación. Paidós.
James, A. & Prout, A. (Eds). (1990). Constructing and re-constructing childhood: Contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood. Falmer Press.
Kagan, S. L., Cohen, N. E., & Neuman, M. J. (1996). The changing context of American early care and education. En S. L. Kagan & N. E. Cohen (Eds.), Reinventing early care and education: A vision for a quality system (pp. 1-20). Jossey-Bass.
Martínez Muñoz, M. & Ligero Lasa, J. A. (2003). Familia, infancia y derechos: Una mirada cualitativa desde la percepción adulta. Portularia, 3, 49-65.
Martínez Muñoz, M. & Sauri, G. (2006). Participación infantil y evaluación participativa: Reflexiones desde la perspectiva de los derechos de la infancia. Revista Internacional NATs, (15), 101-126. https://enclavedeevaluacion.com/pronatsesp/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/OK-nats15.pdf
Moss, P. (2006). Structures, understandings and discourses: Possibilities for re-envisioning the early childhood worker. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 7(1), 30-41. https://doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2006.7.1.30
Moss, P. (2014). Transformative Change and real utopias in early childhood education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315779904
Moss, P. (2015). There are alternatives! Contestation and hope in early childhood education. Global Studies of Childhood, 5(3), 226-238. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043610615597130
Oberhuemer, P. & Schreyer, I. (Eds.). (2017). Workforce profiles in systems of early childhood education and care in Europe. State Institute of Early Childhood Research.
Parsons, T. (1959). El sistema social. Revista de occidente.
Rodríguez-Pascual, I. & Morales-Marente, E. (2013). ¿Cuántas veces dejamos de ser niños? Un análisis de la representación social de la autonomía infantil. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas (REIS), (143), 75-92. https://doi.org/10.5477/cis/reis.143.75
Solway, D. (2000). The turtle hypodermic of Sicken Pods. Liberal studies in the corporate age. McGill-Queen’s University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780773568785
Susinos Rada, T., Romero Morante, J., Ceballos López, N., & Saiz Linares, , Á. (2022). Reforma de la formación inicial de docentes en clave ecosocial. La pandemia como maestra. Innovación Educativa, (32). https://doi.org/10.15304/ie.32.8703
Taylor, S. J. & Bogdan, R. (2002). Introducción a los métodos cualitativos de investigación. La búsqueda de significados. Paidos.
Triviño, A. V. (2018). Imaginarios sociales de infancia y su incidencia en la práctica pedagógica de una escuela bogotana. Revista Historia de la Educación Latinoamericana, 20(31), 47-69. https://doi.org/10.19053/01227238.8538
United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund (UNICEF). (1989). Convención sobre los Derechos del Niño. https://www.un.org/es/events/childrenday/pdf/derechos.pdf
Urban, M. (2010). Rethinking professionalism in early childhood: Untested feasibilities and critical ecologies. Contemporary issues in early childhood, 11(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2010.11.1.1
Wintersberger, H. (2006). Infancia y ciudadanía: El orden generacional del estado de bienestar Política y Sociedad, 43(1), 81-103. https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/POSO/article/view/POSO0606130081A/22668
Wright, E. O. (2013). Transforming capitalism through real utopias. Irish Journal of Sociology, 21(2), 6-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122412468882
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ángela Saiz-Linares, Noelia Ceballos-López
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
1. In case the submitted paper is accepted for publication, the author(s) FREELY, COSTLESS, EXCLUSIVELY AND FOR AN INDEFINITE TERM transfer copyrights and patrimonial rights to Universidad Nacional (UNA, Costa Rica). For more details check the Originality Statement and Copyright Transfer Agreement
2. REUTILIZATION RIGHTS: UNA authorizes authors to use, for any purpose (among them selfarchiving or autoarchiving) and to publish in the Internet in any electronic site, the paper´'s final version, both approved and published (post print), as long as it is done with a non commercial purpose, does not generate derivates without previous consentment and recognizes both publisher's name and authorship.
3. The submission and possible publication of the paper in the Educare Electronic Journal is ruled by the Journal’s editorial policies, the institutional rules of Universidad Nacional and the laws of the Republic of Costa Rica. Additionally, any possible difference of opinion or future dispute shall be settled in accordance with the mechanisms of Alternative Dispute Resolution and the Costa Rican Jurisdiction.
4. In all cases, it is understood that the opinions issued are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position and opinion of Educare, CIDE or Universidad Nacional, Costa Rica. It is also understood that, in the exercise of academic freedom, the authors have carried out a rogorous scientific-academic process of research, reflection and argumentation thar lays within the thematic scope of interest of the Journal.
5. The papers published by Educare Electronic Journal use a Creative Commons License:
The articles published by Educare Electronic Journal can be shared with a Creative Commons License: 
