Perceived creativity in insight problems by secondary school students: Effects of problem and solver’s variables
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.28-2.18481Keywords:
Secondary school students, insight problems, creative thinking, problem solving, Quality education, academic skillsAbstract
Objective: The study analyzes secondary school students’ perceptions of creativity in insight problems. Methodology. An empirical study was conducted with a total of 127 Spanish students from 8th grade and 11th grade. The students evaluated the creativity involved in the problems before and after attempting to solve them. These evaluations were related to grade, gender, surface, and structural aspects of the problems. Everyday life and science contexts were considered as problem surfaces. The structural aspects of the problems were associated with the specific strategy needed to solve them, such as chunk decomposition and constraint relaxation, the assistance provided by the problem statement to initiate the resolution process, and the possibility of metacognitive control over the quality of the solution. Individual booklets with counterbalanced statements were prepared to assess perceived creativity and to solve the problems. Results. Contrary to expectations, students were able to mentally represent the structural aspects of the problems during reading, and before solving them. The problem surface did not significantly affect the initial perception of creativity. After solving the problems, the average changes in perceived creativity were small. Conclusions. The results encourage teachers to use insight problems to promote creativity in secondary school classrooms.
References
Alabau Gonzalvo, J., Solaz-Portoles, J. J., & Sanjosé López, V. (2020) Relación entre creencias sobre resolución de problemas, creencias epistemológicas, nivel académico, sexo y desempeño en resolución de problemas: Un estudio en educación secundaria. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 17(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2020.v17.i1.1102
Christidou, V. (2011). Interest, attitudes and images related to science: Combining students’ voices with the voices of school science, teachers, and popular science. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 6(2), 141-159. http://www.ijese.net/makale_indir/IJESE_1437_article_582c0cb630608.pdf
Diakidoy, I.-A. & Kanari, E. (1999). Student teachers’ beliefs about creativity. British Educational Research Journal, 25(2), 225-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192990250206
Dow, G. T. & Mayer, R. E. (2004). Teaching students to solve insight problems: Evidence for domain specificity in creativity training. Creativity Research Journal, 16(4), 389-398. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410409534550
Gilhooly, K. & Webb, M. E. (2018). Working memory and insight problem solving. En F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Ed.), Insight. On the origins of new ideas (pp. 105-119). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315268118-6
Gómez-Ferragud, C., Solaz-Portolés, J. J., & Sanjosé López, V. (2013). Efectos de la similitud superficial y estructural sobre la transferencia a partir de análogos en problemas de alta y baja familiaridad: Primeros resultados. Enseñanza de las ciencias, 31(1), 135-151. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ec/v31n1.782
Gómez Ferragud, C. B., Solaz-Portolés, J. J., & Sanjosé López, V. (2015). Effects of topic familiarity on analogical transfer in problem-solving: A think-aloud study of two singular cases. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(4), 875-887. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1416a
Haavold, P. Ø. & Sriraman, B. (2022). Creativity in problem solving: Integrating two different views of insight. ZDM Mathematics Education 54, 83-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01304-8
Ibrahim, B. & Rebello, N. S. (2013). Role of mental representations in problem solving: Students’ approaches to nondirected tasks. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 9(2), 020106, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.9.020106
Kershaw, T. C. & Ohlsson, S. (2004). Multiple causes of difficulty in insight: The case of the nine-dot problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(1), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.30.1.3
Khalid, M., Saad, S., Hamid, S. R. A., Abdullah, M. R., Ibrahim, H., & Shahrill, M. (2020). Enhancing creativity and problem-solving skills through creative problem solving in teaching mathematics. Creativity Studies, 13(2), 270-291. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2020.11027
Knoblich, G., Ohlsson, S., Haider, H., & Rhenius, D. (1999). Constraint relaxation and chunk decomposition in insight problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(6), 1534-1555. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.25.6.1534
Kroesbergen, E. H. & Schoevers, E. M. (2017). Creativity as predictor of mathematical abilities in fourth graders in addition to number sense and working memory. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 3(2), 417-440. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.v3i2.63
Lederman, N. G., Lederman, J. S., & Antink, A. (2013). Nature of science and scientific inquiry as contexts for the learning of science and achievement of scientific literacy. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 1(3), 138-147. https://www.ijemst.net/index.php/ijemst/article/view/19
Leikin, R. & Sriraman, B. (2022). Empirical research on creativity in mathematics (education): From the wastelands of psychology to the current state of the art. ZDM –Mathematics Education, 54(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01340-y
Lindberg, S. M., Hyde, J. S., Petersen, J. L., & Linn, M. C. (2010). New trends in gender and mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 1123-1135. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021276
Liu, S.-Ch. & Lin H-S. (2014). Primary Teachers’ beliefs about Scientific Creativity in the Classroom Context. International Journal of Science Education, 36(10), 1551-1567. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.868619
Martinsen, Ø. L. & Furnham, A. (2019). Cognitive style and competence motivation in creative problem solving. Personality and Individual Differences, 139, 241-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.11.023
Ministerio de Educación y Formación Profesional. (2022, marzo 03). Real Decreto 157/2022, de 1 de marzo, por el que se establecen la ordenación y las enseñanzas mínimas de la Educación Primaria. BOE, núm. 52, pp. 1-109. https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-2022-3296
Mumford, M. D., Baughman, W., Threlfall, K. V., Supinski, E. P., & Costanza, D. P. (1996). Process-Based measures of creative problem-solving skills: I. Problem construction. Creativity Research Journal, 9(1), 63-76. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj0901_6
Mumford, M. D., Hester, K. S., Robledo, I. C., Peterson, D. R., Day, E. A., Hougen, D. F., & Barrett, J. D. (2012). Mental models and creative problem-solving: The relationship of objective and subjective model attributes. Creativity Research Journal, 24(4), 311-330. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.730008
Newton, L. D. & Newton, D. P. (2010). What teachers see as creative incidents in elementary science lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 32(15), 1989-2005. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903233249
Ohlsson, S. (2011). Deep learning: How the mind overrides experience. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511780295
Olivos, F., Álvarez, I., & Díaz, F. (2013). Impacto de la educación para el emprendimiento en la creatividad: Una experiencia en Chile con Propensity Score Matching. Revista Electrónica Educare, 17(3), 259-276. https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.17-3.12
Patston, T. J., Kaufman, J. C., Cropley, A. J., & Marrone, R. (2021). What is creativity in education? A qualitative study of international curricula. Journal of Advanced Academics, 32(2), 207-230. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X20978356
Pétervári, J. & Danek, A. H. (2020). Problem solving of magic tricks: Guiding to and through an impasse with solution cues. Thinking & Reasoning, 26(4), 502-533. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2019.1668479
Riba, S. S. & Auque, M. D. (2003). Metacognición y resolución diferencial de un problema de insight: Un estudio comparativo entre adolescentes con alta capacidad intelectual y aptitudes medias. Faisca Revista de Altas Capacidades, 10, 5-25. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/revista/6200/A/2003
Royston, R. & Reiter‐Palmon, R. (2019). Creative self‐efficacy as mediator between creative mindsets and creative problem‐solving. Journal of Creative Behavior, 53(4), 472-481. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.226
Welling, H. (2007). Four mental operations in creative cognition: The importance of abstraction. Creativity Research Journal, 19(2-3), 163-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410701397214
Widya, W., Nurpatri, Y., Indrawati, E. S., & Ikhwan, K. (2020). Development and application of creative problem solving in mathematics and science: A literature review. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(1), 106-116. https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v3i1.4335
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Hanane Yousfi, Vicente Sanjosé, Carlos Bernardo Gómez-Ferragud, Joan Josep Solaz-Portolés
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
1. In case the submitted paper is accepted for publication, the author(s) FREELY, COSTLESS, EXCLUSIVELY AND FOR AN INDEFINITE TERM transfer copyrights and patrimonial rights to Universidad Nacional (UNA, Costa Rica). For more details check the Originality Statement and Copyright Transfer Agreement
2. REUTILIZATION RIGHTS: UNA authorizes authors to use, for any purpose (among them selfarchiving or autoarchiving) and to publish in the Internet in any electronic site, the paper´'s final version, both approved and published (post print), as long as it is done with a non commercial purpose, does not generate derivates without previous consentment and recognizes both publisher's name and authorship.
3. The submission and possible publication of the paper in the Educare Electronic Journal is ruled by the Journal’s editorial policies, the institutional rules of Universidad Nacional and the laws of the Republic of Costa Rica. Additionally, any possible difference of opinion or future dispute shall be settled in accordance with the mechanisms of Alternative Dispute Resolution and the Costa Rican Jurisdiction.
4. In all cases, it is understood that the opinions issued are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position and opinion of Educare, CIDE or Universidad Nacional, Costa Rica. It is also understood that, in the exercise of academic freedom, the authors have carried out a rogorous scientific-academic process of research, reflection and argumentation thar lays within the thematic scope of interest of the Journal.
5. The papers published by Educare Electronic Journal use a Creative Commons License:
The articles published by Educare Electronic Journal can be shared with a Creative Commons License: 
