Heredia Declaration: Principles on the use of Artificial Intelligence in scientific publishing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.28-S.19967Keywords:
Scientific edition, editorial management, artificial intelligence, ethics, scientific communicationAbstract
Introduction. From the perspective of scientific publishing, the Heredia Declaration proposes a series of considerations for the responsible use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the research processes that lead to scientific publication. AI is recognized as a tool whose use must be evident and transparent for a clear, traceable, and reproducible communication of knowledge. Attention is drawn to the challenges posed by the inclusion of AI into scientific publishing regarding the diversity of options, avoiding the spread of bias and misinformation, and respect for intellectual property. Principles. They are organized into four groups: general, for authorship, peer review, and editing roles. These principles highlight the importance of using AI as a tool, its results must be filtered by human beings and from an ethical and responsible perspective, transparently reporting which model was used, what was consulted, and when the consultation was made. Final reflection. It shows that it is a constantly evolving scenario whose goal must be human well-being and quality of life.
References
Academia de Propiedad Intelectual. (2023, diciembre 5 y 6). I Congreso Internacional de Propiedad Intelectual y Nuevas Tecnologías Digitales. Registro Nacional de Costa Rica.
Appel, G., Neelbauer, J., & Schweidel, D. A. (2023, abril 07). Generative AI Has an Intellectual Property Problem. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2023/04/generative-ai-has-an-intellectual-property-problem
Bhosale, U. & Kapadia, A. (2023, september 29). AI Integration can Future-Proof Peer Review – But only if we define and drive the right principles. Enago Academy. https://www.enago.com/academy/ai-integration-in-peer-review/
Cardoso Sampaio, R. (2024, febrero 07). Recomendações iniciais para editores de periódicos científicos sobre o uso de Inteligência Artificial generativa. Dados [Blog]. http://dados.iesp.uerj.br/recomendacoes-iniciais-para-editores-de-periodicos-cientificos-sobre-o-uso-de-inteligencia-artificial-generativa/
Comisión Europea. (2021). Propuesta de Reglamento del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo por el que se establecen normas armonizadas en materia de inteligencia artificial (ley de inteligencia artificial) y se modifican determinados actos legislativos de la unión 2121/0106. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ES/TXT/?uri=celex%3A52021PC0206
COPE. (2023, febrero 13). Authorship and AI tools. https://publicationethics.org/cope-position-statements/ai-author
Future of Life Institute. (2017). Asilomar AI Principles. https://futureoflife.org/open-letter/ai-principles/
Estevez, C. (2023, noviembre 02). Taller Scopus para Editores: Gestión Editorial. Scopus; Conare.
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). (2024). Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals. https://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). (2024, febrero 6). Who Is an Author? Defining the Role of Authors and Contributors. https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html.
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). (2024, febrero 6). Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Assisted Technology. https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html.
Kaebnick, G. E., Magnus, D. C., Kao, A., Hosseini, M., Resnik, D., Dubljević, V., Rentmeester, C., Gordijn, B., & Cherry, M. J. (2023). Editors' Statement on the Responsible Use of Generative AI Technologies in Scholarly Journal Publishing. The Hastings Center Report, 53(5), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.1507
Levene, A. (2023, febrero 23). Artificial intelligence and authorship. COPE. https://publicationethics.org/news/artificial-intelligence-and-authorship
Nazer, L. H., Zatarah, R., Waldrip, S., Chen Ke, J. X., Moukheiber, M., Khanna, A. K., Hicklen, R. S., Moukheiber, L., Moukheiber, D., Ma, H., & Mathur, P. (2023). Bias in artificial intelligence algorithms and recommendations for mitigation. Plos Digital Health, 2(6), e0000278. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig,0000278
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2023). Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence, OECD/LEGAL/0449. https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0449
Organización Mundial de la Propiedad Intelectual (OMPI). (2020). Diálogo de la OMPI sobre propiedad intelectual (PI) e Inteligencia artificia (IA). https://www.wipo.int/meetings/es/details.jsp?meeting_id=55309
ReviewersCredits. (2024, febrero 22). AI in Peer Review: Reviewer Credits Discussion Webinar [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DWrrbwHLU8Q
Spinak, E. (2023, agosto 30). Inteligencia Artificial y comunicación de investigaciones. Scielo Blog [Blog]. https://blog.scielo.org/es/2023/08/30/inteligencia-artificial-y-comunicacion-de-investigaciones/
Tavira, R. (2023). Política editorial de revistas con relación a la IA: casos Elsevier, Springer Nature y Taylor/Francis. Boletín SciELO-México. https://boletinscielomx.blogspot.com/2023/08/revistas-frente-la-ia-casos-elsevier.html?spref=tw
The University of Utah. (2023, julio 13). Guidance in the use of AI in research. https://attheu.utah.edu/facultystaff/vpr-statement-on-the-use-of-ai-in-research/
Unesco. (2019, mayo 16 a 18). Consenso de Beijing sobre la inteligencia artificial y la educación. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000368303
Unesco. (2022). Recomendación sobre la ética de la inteligencia artificial. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381137_spa
Watson, R. & Štiglic, G. (2023, febrero 23). Guest editorial: The challenge of AI chatbots for journal editors. COPE. https://publicationethics.org/news/challenge-ai-chatbots-journal-editors
Zielinski, C., Winker, M. A., Aggarwal, R., Ferris, L. E., Heinemann, M., Lapeña, J. F., Pai, S. A., Ing, E., Citrome, L., Alam, M., Voigh,t M., Habibzadeh, F., & WAME Board. (2023, mayo 31). Chatbots, Generative AI, and Scholarly Manuscripts. WAME Recommendations on Chatbots and Generative Artificial Intelligence in Relation to Scholarly Publications. WAME. https://wame.org/page3.php?id=106
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Liana Penabad-Camacho, María Amalia Penabad-Camacho, Andrea Mora-Campos, Gerardo Cerdas-Vega, Yuri Morales-López, Mónica Ulate-Segura, Andrea Mendez-Solano, Nidya Nova-Bustos, María Fernanda Vega-Solano, María Milagro Castro-Solano
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
1. In case the submitted paper is accepted for publication, the author(s) FREELY, COSTLESS, EXCLUSIVELY AND FOR AN INDEFINITE TERM transfer copyrights and patrimonial rights to Universidad Nacional (UNA, Costa Rica). For more details check the Originality Statement and Copyright Transfer Agreement
2. REUTILIZATION RIGHTS: UNA authorizes authors to use, for any purpose (among them selfarchiving or autoarchiving) and to publish in the Internet in any electronic site, the paper´'s final version, both approved and published (post print), as long as it is done with a non commercial purpose, does not generate derivates without previous consentment and recognizes both publisher's name and authorship.
3. The submission and possible publication of the paper in the Educare Electronic Journal is ruled by the Journal’s editorial policies, the institutional rules of Universidad Nacional and the laws of the Republic of Costa Rica. Additionally, any possible difference of opinion or future dispute shall be settled in accordance with the mechanisms of Alternative Dispute Resolution and the Costa Rican Jurisdiction.
4. In all cases, it is understood that the opinions issued are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position and opinion of Educare, CIDE or Universidad Nacional, Costa Rica. It is also understood that, in the exercise of academic freedom, the authors have carried out a rogorous scientific-academic process of research, reflection and argumentation thar lays within the thematic scope of interest of the Journal.
5. The papers published by Educare Electronic Journal use a Creative Commons License:
The articles published by Educare Electronic Journal can be shared with a Creative Commons License: 
