Mobility of Academic Women in Decision-making Positions: The Case of the National University of Costa Rica
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.19-2.13Keywords:
Female employment, gender roles, decision-making, University, Costa RicaAbstract
This article arises from a research work entitled “Institutional Diagnosis: Equity Relations between Men and Women at the National University: Second Phase,” performed in 2011 by the Institute of Women’s Studies. This study aims at “Analyzing, from a gender perspective, the social and labor conditions and positioning of those academic employees at the National University in order to determine the gender inequity gaps that restrict the full development of men and women.” This research was conducted by reviewing listings of people elected for decision-making positions from 1976 to mid-2009. This information was provided by the National University Elections Commission (TEUNA3, for its Spanish acronym). Interviews were made to women who, for the first time, held senior positions at this university and who are still working here. Among the main findings of this research is the gradual increase of women holding senior positions such as Rector, Dean and Director. Once the interviews had been transcribed, we proceeded to prepare the categories of analysis. When the university was first founded, most Dean’s positions were held by men. But throughout time –in the 2000s, equity regarding the number of men and women in this category was observed. In terms of management positions, faculties with a significant number of male academic employees -such as Social Sciences, Earth and Ocean Sciences, and Natural Sciences, have little representation of women in these positions. This article finds that women positively evaluate their experience in senior positions since it has helped them grow and gain personal and professional confidence. They also highlighted a number of achievements and contributions made to their corresponding academic units.References
Burin, M. (1996). Género y psicoanálisis: Subjetividades femeninas vulnerables. En M. Burin, y E. Dio Bleichmar (Comps.), Género, psicoanálisis, subjetividad (pp. 61-99). Buenos Aires: Paidós.
Di Liscia, M. H. y Rodríguez, A. M. (2002). Relaciones de poder en la Universidad. El caso de la Universidad Nacional de la Pampa. La Aljaba: Revista de Estudios de la Mujer. Segunda Época, 7(2), 137- 156. Recuperado de http://www.biblioteca.unlpam.edu.ar/pubpdf/aljaba/n07a06diliscia.pdf
Fernández, D. (2008). Diagnóstico Institucional: Relaciones de equidad entre mujeres y hombres en la Universidad Nacional (I Fase), Heredia, Costa Rica. Manuscrito inédito.
Fernández, D., Jiménez, S., Marenco, L. y Sequeira, P. (2014). Diagnóstico Institucional: Relaciones de equidad entre mujeres y hombres en la Universidad Nacional. Heredia, Costa Rica: Programa de Publicaciones e Impresiones Universidad Nacional de Cosa Rica. Recuperado de http://www.iem.una.ac.cr/index.php/publicaciones/investigacion/diagnostico
García, P. (Diciembre, 2003). Mujeres ejecutivas en la academia. Reencuentro, 38, 66-72. Recuperado de http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=34003809
Hinton, D. (Diciembre, 2010). Creating Community on the Margins: The Successful Black Female Academician. Urban Review, 42(5), 394-402. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11256-009-0140-3
Husu, L. (2001). On Metaphors on the Position of Women in Academia and Science [En metáforas sobre la posición de las mujeres en el mundo académico y la ciencia]. NORA - Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 9(3), 172-181. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713801035
Isaac, C. A., Behar-Horenstein, L. S. y Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2009). Women Deans: Leadership Becoming [Mujeres decanas: Liderazgo convirtiéndose]. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 12(2), 135-153. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13603120802485102
Monge, I. y Soto, T. (2005). Compilación leyes y decretos: Derechos de las mujeres (Tomo I). San José: Instituto Nacional de las Mujeres.
Ranking web de universidades (2015). Universidad Nacional Costa Rica. Recuperado de http://www.webometrics.info/es/detalles/una.ac.cr
Torres, I. (2010). Costa Rica: Sistema electoral, participación y representación política de las mujeres. San José, Costa Rica: Instraw Naciones Unidas. Recuperado de http://www.iidh.ed.cr/multic/UserFiles/Biblioteca/CAPEL/9_2010/42226b86-b14f-4b6a-9bf9-5ec33b6351b4.pdf
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
1. In case the submitted paper is accepted for publication, the author(s) FREELY, COSTLESS, EXCLUSIVELY AND FOR AN INDEFINITE TERM transfer copyrights and patrimonial rights to Universidad Nacional (UNA, Costa Rica). For more details check the Originality Statement and Copyright Transfer Agreement
2. REUTILIZATION RIGHTS: UNA authorizes authors to use, for any purpose (among them selfarchiving or autoarchiving) and to publish in the Internet in any electronic site, the paper´'s final version, both approved and published (post print), as long as it is done with a non commercial purpose, does not generate derivates without previous consentment and recognizes both publisher's name and authorship.
3. The submission and possible publication of the paper in the Educare Electronic Journal is ruled by the Journal’s editorial policies, the institutional rules of Universidad Nacional and the laws of the Republic of Costa Rica. Additionally, any possible difference of opinion or future dispute shall be settled in accordance with the mechanisms of Alternative Dispute Resolution and the Costa Rican Jurisdiction.
4. In all cases, it is understood that the opinions issued are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position and opinion of Educare, CIDE or Universidad Nacional, Costa Rica. It is also understood that, in the exercise of academic freedom, the authors have carried out a rogorous scientific-academic process of research, reflection and argumentation thar lays within the thematic scope of interest of the Journal.
5. The papers published by Educare Electronic Journal use a Creative Commons License: