Academic and Administrative Issues for Implementation of Capstone Course in Civil Engineering programs: Case Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.21-2.17Keywords:
Technical writing, undergraduate, requirements, collaborative work, Capstone.Abstract
A capstone course is a culminating academic experience designed to encourage teamwork among students by applying their five years of classroom knowledge to solve realistic engineering problems. This emerging capstone experience demands academic and administrative changes to guarantee a satisfactory result within the time spared for this purpose. The main objective of this research is to assess students’ perception regarding the capstone project as a culminating academic experience, and to use the analysis results to propose academic and administrative changes required to support and guarantee the successful achievement of this type of final degree project. To reach this goal, an assessment instrument was prepared and applied to 47 students enrolled in a capstone course. The instrument allowed collecting information regarding problem-based learning experience, teamwork experience, and self-perception concerning students’ own behaviors and attitude during teamworking. On this regard, 87.2% of students considered capstone as a suitable final degree experience; however, it is challenging because it is known that student’s participation during teamworking is uncommon and usually just two students are committed. In spite of this, 86.2% of students considered that teamwork was satisfactory and 95.2% of them recognized that their self-behavior and attitude during teamworking was good. Based on the results we recommend to strengthen teamwork strategies among students, and to instruct teachers about assessment strategies to evaluate individual and teamwork performance of students. It is expected that these findings can help improve the capstone curriculum related to courses and their administration. These findings are also supposed to serve as a previous experience to those universities committed to include capstone as a culminating degree experience.References
Agboola, O. P., Hashemipour, M., Egelioglu, F., Atikol, U., & Hacisevki, H. (2012). Assessing a decade old capstone senior projects through ABET accreditation program outcomes. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 120-125. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.624
Ardis, M., Hole, E., & Manfredonia, J. (2013). Creating a marketplace for multidisciplinary multi-university systems engineering capstone projects. Procedia Computer Science, 16, 1036-1042. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.01.109
Blackford, B., & Shi, T. (2015). The relationship between business simulations in capstone management courses and standardized test scores. The International Journal of Management Education, 13(1), 84-94. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2015.01.005
Cooper, C., Fulton, J., & Homan, J. (2015). A multi-spectrum framework for characterizing interdisciplinary capstone design experiences. Procedia Computer Science, 44, 699-707. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.03.018
Good, D. J., & McIntyre, C. (2015). Use of journal clubs within senior capstone courses: Analysis of perceived gains in reviewing scientific literature. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 47(5), 477-479. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2015.05.003
Gruenther, K., Bailey, R., Wilson, J., Plucker, C., & Hashmi, H. (2009). The influence of prior industry experience and multidisciplinary teamwork on student design learning in a capstone design course. Design Studies, 30(6), 721-736. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2009.06.001
Helms, M. M., & Whitesell, M. (2013). Transitioning to the embedded librarian model and improving the senior capstone business strategy course. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 39(5), 401-413. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2013.03.015
Lubbers, C. A. (2011). An assessment of predictors of student peer evaluations of team work in the capstone campaigns course. Public Relations Review, 37, 492-498. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.09.013
Nelson, J. M., Cook, P. F., & Raterink, G. (2013). The evolution of a doctor of nursing practice capstone process: Programmatic revisions to improve the quality of student projects, 29(6), 370-380. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2012.05.018
Odora, R. J. (2015). Integrating product design and entrepreneurship education: A stimulant for enterprising design and engineering students in South Africa. Procedia Technology, 20, 276-283. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2015.07.044
Oehrtman, S. J., Smolen, D., Hoblet, K. &, Phillips, K. A. (2010). The comprehensive examination: A viable master’s of science in nursing capstone course. Journal of Professional Nursing, 26(6), 360-365. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2010.08.003
Osman, S. A., Jaafar, O., Wan Badaruzzaman, W. H. W. &, Rahmat, R. A. (2012). The course outcomes (COs) evaluation for civil engineering design course. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 60, 103-111. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.354
Quinot, G., & van Tonder, S. P. (2014). The potential of capstone learning experiences in addressing perceived shortcomings in LLB training in South Africa. PER: Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad, 17(4), 1350-1390. doi: https://doi.org/10.4314/pelj.v17i4.05
Shin, Y.-S., Lee K-W., Ahn, J-S. & Jung, J-W. (2013). Development of Internship & Capstone Design Integrated Program for University-Industry Collaboration. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 102, 386-391. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.753
Stanley, T., & Marsden, S. (2013). Accountancy capstone: Enhancing integration and professional identity. Journal of Accounting Education, 31(4), 363-382. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2013.08.002
Vellurattil, R. P., Puglisi, M. P., Johnson, C. L. &, Slonek, J. (2014). Introduction of a capstone research program in a new college of pharmacy: Student perceptions. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 6(3), 429-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2014.02.008
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
1. In case the submitted paper is accepted for publication, the author(s) FREELY, COSTLESS, EXCLUSIVELY AND FOR AN INDEFINITE TERM transfer copyrights and patrimonial rights to Universidad Nacional (UNA, Costa Rica). For more details check the Originality Statement and Copyright Transfer Agreement
2. REUTILIZATION RIGHTS: UNA authorizes authors to use, for any purpose (among them selfarchiving or autoarchiving) and to publish in the Internet in any electronic site, the paper´'s final version, both approved and published (post print), as long as it is done with a non commercial purpose, does not generate derivates without previous consentment and recognizes both publisher's name and authorship.
3. The submission and possible publication of the paper in the Educare Electronic Journal is ruled by the Journal’s editorial policies, the institutional rules of Universidad Nacional and the laws of the Republic of Costa Rica. Additionally, any possible difference of opinion or future dispute shall be settled in accordance with the mechanisms of Alternative Dispute Resolution and the Costa Rican Jurisdiction.
4. In all cases, it is understood that the opinions issued are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position and opinion of Educare, CIDE or Universidad Nacional, Costa Rica. It is also understood that, in the exercise of academic freedom, the authors have carried out a rogorous scientific-academic process of research, reflection and argumentation thar lays within the thematic scope of interest of the Journal.
5. The papers published by Educare Electronic Journal use a Creative Commons License:
The articles published by Educare Electronic Journal can be shared with a Creative Commons License: 
