Proposal of a Technology Model for Flipped Classroom (T-FliC) in Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.22-2.2Keywords:
Higher education, flipped classroom, technology model, ICT.Abstract
The Technology Model, called T-FliC is proposed for Flipped Classroom. The aim is to provide IT facilities to the aforementioned pedagogical model. This proposal may be implemented at different levels of higher education. T-FliC is primarily based on the use of free technology resources, especially Google applications such as Classroom, Drive, and YouTube, because they are widely used by students and teachers. This extensive use permits to replicate this model in different educational contexts. The T-FliC model incorporates five ICT phases, ranging from the planning of teaching-learning activities to continuous learning assessments. The implementation of the T-FliC Model includes the following phases: a digital class (learning outside the classroom) with asynchronous guidance of a virtual tutor; a workshop involving dynamic activities for collaborative work (classroom learning) guided by a tutor in person; and an ongoing technological tools evaluation process (clickers, portfolio, and forum) which will generate the digital records of the student learning path. This article includes a bibliographic review of the role of ICT in the education processes and the fundamentals of the Flipped Classroom (FC) methodology. In the paper are included FC implementation experiences in higher education, followed by the presentation of the T-FliC Model as a technological proposal for this methodology. Finally, the conclusions present reflections on the proposal.References
Adams-Becker, S., Cummins, M., Davis, A., Freeman, A., Hall Giesinger, C. y Ananthanarayanan, V. (2017). NMC Horizon Report: 2017 Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium. Recuperado de http://cdn.nmc.org/media/2017-nmc-horizon-report-he-EN.pdf
Ahumada, M. E. (2013). Las TIC en la formación basada en competencias. Revista Universidad de La Salle, 60, 141-157. Recuperado de https://revistas.lasalle.edu.co/index.php/ls/article/view/2388/2133
Barberá, E. (2006). Aportaciones de la tecnología a la e-Evaluación. RED: Revista de Educación a Distancia. Monograph 6, 1-13. Recuperado de http://www.um.es/ead/red/M6/barbera.pdf
Bergmann, J. y Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. United States of America: International Society for Technology in Education. Recuperado de https://www.liceopalmieri.gov.it/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Flip-Your-Classroom.pdf
Bishop, J. y Verleger, M. (June, 2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. In 120th ASEE National Conference & Exposition. Atlanta: American Society for Engineering Education. Recuperado de https://www.asee.org/public/conferences/20/papers/6219/view
Burbules, N. (2012). El aprendizaje ubicuo y el futuro de la enseñanza. Encounters on Education, 13, 3-14. Recuperado de https://dialnet.unirioja.es/ejemplar/318240
Cabero, J., Llorente, M. y Gisbert, M. (2007). El papel del profesor y el alumno en los nuevos entornos tecnológicos de formación. En J. Cabero (Coord.), Nuevas tecnologías aplicadas a la educación (pp. 261-277). Madrid: McGraw-Hill.
Careaga, M. (2008). Gestión del conocimiento. “Modelos de referencia para su inserción en Educación” (Parte 2) [Mensaje en un blog]. Recuperado de http://www.eduglobal.cl/2013/09/13/gestion-del-conocimiento-modelos-de-referencia-para-su-insercion-en-educacion/
Careaga, M. y Avendaño, A. (2015). Currículum cibernético y gestión del conocimiento. Fundamentos y modelos de referencia. Chile: Editorial UCSC.
Chen, S.-C., Yang, S. J. H. y Hsiao, C-C. (2016). Exploring student perceptions, learning outcome and gender differences in a flipped mathematics course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(6), 1096-1112. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12278
Chiple, R. y Ramos, A. (2014). Acompañamiento 100% presencial para una modalidad 100% virtual. En P. Requeijo y C. Gaona (Eds.), Contenidos innovadores en la universidad actual (pp. 203-218). Madrid: McGraw-Hill. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jose_Diaz-Cuesta/publication/280551145_Masculinidades_que_dejan_huella_en_%27The_Sugarland_Express%27_Spielberg_1974/links/55b8a07b08aed621de05f19f/Masculinidades-que-dejan-huella-en-The-Sugarland-Express-Spielberg-1974.pdf
Claro, M. (2010). Impacto de las TIC en los aprendizajes de los estudiantes: Estado del arte. Santiago de Chile: Naciones Unidas. Recuperado de http://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/3781/lcw339.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
De Miguel, M. (Dir.). (2005). Modalidades de enseñanza centradas en el desarrollo de competencias. Orientaciones para promover el cambio metodológico en el espacio europeo de educación superior. Oviedo: Ediorial Universidad de Oviedo. Recuperado de https://www.upc.edu/rima/ca/grups/grapa/bibliografia-evaluacion/publicaciones/modalidades-de-ensenanza/view
Declaración de Bolonia. Declaración conjunta de los ministros europeos de educación. (1999). Recuperado de http://www.educacion.gob.es/boloniaensecundaria/img/Declaracion_Bolonia.pdf
Downes, S. (2012). Connectivism and connective knowledge. Essays on meaning and learning networks. Canadá: National Research Council Canada. Recuperado de https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4718/ee3c1930820e094552f0933cbc3b86548dbc.pdf
Fernández, E., Bernardo, A., Suárez, N., Cerezo, R., Núñez, J. y Rosário, P. (2013). Predicción del uso de estrategias de autorregulación en educación superior. Anales de psicología, 29(3), 865-875. doi: https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.29.3.139341
Gutiérrez, I. y Rada, C. (2012). El pensamiento constructivista como ideal en la universidad. Arte & Diseño, 10(2), 23-27. Recuperado de http://ojs.uac.edu.co/index.php/arte-diseno/article/view/127/112
Hamdan, N., McKnight, P., McKnight, K. y Arfstrom, K. (2013). The flipped learning model: A white paper based on the literature review titled A review of flipped learning. Arlington, VA: Flipped Learning Network.
Hasbún, B. (2014). Flipped Classroom en FEN U de Chile [Presentación en Prezi]. Recuperado de https://prezi.com/hur_jd_zom3f/flipped-classroom-en-fen-u-de-chile/
Iglesias, R. R. y Suárez, C. O. (2003). El papel de la metacognición en la sistematización de las habilidades cognitivas. Psicología, 101, 126-130.
Jerez, O., Hasbún, B. y Rittershaussen, S. (2015). El diseño de Syllabus en la educación superior. Una propuesta metodológica. Chile: Ediciones Universidad de Chile. Recuperado de http://goo.gl/SgFsc4
Lage, M. J. y Platt, G. J. (2000). The internet and the inverted classroom. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 11-11. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220480009596756
Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J. y Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30-43. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/1183338
Long, T., Cummins, J. y Waugh, M. (2017). Use of the flipped classroom instructional model in higher education: Instructors’ perspectives. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29(2), 179-200. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-016-9119-8
López, M. Á. (2013). Aprendizajes, competencias y TIC. México: Pearson.
McDonald, K. M. y Smith, C. M. (2013). The flipped classroom for professional development: Part I. Benefits and strategies. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 44(10), 437-438. doi: https://doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20130925-19
Observatorio de Innovación Educativa del Tecnológico de Monterrey (2014). Aprendizaje Invertido. Reporte Edutrends, 1-27. Recuperado de http://goo.gl/aFiD55
Osses, S. y Jaramillo, S. (2008). Metacognición: Un camino para aprender a aprender. Estudios pedagógicos, 34(1), 187-197. doi: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07052008000100011
Proyecto Tuning América Latina (2007). Reflexiones y perspectivas de la educación superior en América Latina. Informe final Proyecto Tuning América Latina, 2004-2007. Bilbao: Publicaciones de la Universidad de Deusto. Recuperado de http://goo.gl/D8EbzO
Sengel, E. (2016). To FLIP or not to FLIP: Comparative case study in higher education in Turkey. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 547-555. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.034
Siemens, G. (2004). Conectivismo: Una teoría de aprendizaje para la era digital (Trad. por D. Leal Fonseca).
Silva, J. E. y Astudillo, A. (2013). Formación de tutores: Aspecto clave en enseñanza virtual. Didasc@lia: Didáctica y Educación, 4(1), 87-100. Recuperado de https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=4233643
Sunkel, G. y Trucco, D. (2010). Nuevas tecnologías de la información y la comunicación para la educación en América Latina: Riesgos y oportunidades. Santiago de Chile: Naciones Unidas. Recuperado de http://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/6174/lcl3266.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Tourón, J. y Santiago, R. (2015). Flipped learning model and the development of talent at school. Revista de Educación, 368, 33-65. doi: 10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2015-368-288
Tucker, B. (2012). The flipped classroom. Education Next, 12(1), 82-83. Recuperado de http://educationnext.org/the-flipped-classroom/
Villa, A. y Poblete, M. (Dirs.). (2007). Aprendizaje basado en competencias: Una propuesta para la evaluación de las competencias genéricas. Bilbao: Ediciones Mensajero. Recuperado de http://biblio.upmx.mx/textos/14633.pdf
Woolfolk, A. (2010). Psicología educativa (11ª ed.). México: Pearson. Recuperado de https://crecerpsi.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/libro-psicologia-educativa.pdf
Zainuddin, Z. y Halili, S. H. (2016). Flipped classroom research and trends from different fields of study. International Review of research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3), 313-340. doi: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2274
Zapata-Ros, M. (2015). Teorías y modelos sobre el aprendizaje en entornos conectados y ubicuos: Bases para un nuevo modelo teórico a partir de una visión crítica del” conectivismo”. Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS), 16(1), 69-102. doi: https://doi.org/10.14201/eks201516169102
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
1. In case the submitted paper is accepted for publication, the author(s) FREELY, COSTLESS, EXCLUSIVELY AND FOR AN INDEFINITE TERM transfer copyrights and patrimonial rights to Universidad Nacional (UNA, Costa Rica). For more details check the Originality Statement and Copyright Transfer Agreement
2. REUTILIZATION RIGHTS: UNA authorizes authors to use, for any purpose (among them selfarchiving or autoarchiving) and to publish in the Internet in any electronic site, the paper´'s final version, both approved and published (post print), as long as it is done with a non commercial purpose, does not generate derivates without previous consentment and recognizes both publisher's name and authorship.
3. The submission and possible publication of the paper in the Educare Electronic Journal is ruled by the Journal’s editorial policies, the institutional rules of Universidad Nacional and the laws of the Republic of Costa Rica. Additionally, any possible difference of opinion or future dispute shall be settled in accordance with the mechanisms of Alternative Dispute Resolution and the Costa Rican Jurisdiction.
4. In all cases, it is understood that the opinions issued are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position and opinion of Educare, CIDE or Universidad Nacional, Costa Rica. It is also understood that, in the exercise of academic freedom, the authors have carried out a rogorous scientific-academic process of research, reflection and argumentation thar lays within the thematic scope of interest of the Journal.
5. The papers published by Educare Electronic Journal use a Creative Commons License:
The articles published by Educare Electronic Journal can be shared with a Creative Commons License: 
