The Teaching Model through Problem-Based Learning in a Course on Bibliographic Research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.22-2.7Keywords:
Humanism, globalization, society, student, teacher.Abstract
The experience of applying problem-based learning (PBL) technique in the Bibliographic Research course from a Bachelor of English study plan of a public university during the first half of 2014 is shared. The investigation aimed to answer the following question: Does the problem-based learning technique in the Bibliographic Research course allows to implement the main tenets of the teaching model: epistemological foundation, learning theory, methodology and didactics, and communication processes? The research approach proposed was qualitative, and triangulation for measuring variables was implemented. The following instruments were applied: observation, experience record books, and focus groups. Furthermore, formative learning was measured by means of an online survey. Results of the instruments were categorized using technology-based tools such as Wordle (observation), NVivo (record books) and MindNode (focus groups). A convenience sampling was used to collect data from eight students enrolled in the Bibliographic Research course, ten students of Integrated English II for non-English majors, and the researcher, as professor of the courses. It was determined that the PBL technique permitted to reach the main tenets of the teaching model. It was identified that the teacher was the main learner, and the one who benefited from the process, since a culture of knowledge, throughout the course, was created. It was also concluded that this technique allowed to develop twenty-first century skills. It would be valuable to quantify whether the development of the four basic skills of English, especially the conversation one, improves using the technique along with technologies.
References
Baena-Extremera, A. y Granero-Gallegos, A. (2012). Los mapas conceptuales y el aprendizaje basado en problemas en el aprendizaje de contenidos anatómico-fisiológicos en opositores al cuerpo de profesores de educación secundaria. International Journal of Morphology, 30(1), 230-237. doi: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022012000100041
Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo. (2017). Competencias del siglo XXI en Latinoamérica. Recuperado de http://www.iadb.org/es/temas/educacion/competencias-del-siglo-xxi-en-latinoamerica,3130.html
Blake, K. (2009). Writing in the 21st Century. A report from the National Council of Teachers of English. Recuperado de https://www.nwp.org/cs/public/download/nwp_file/12440/Kathleen_Blake_Yancey_Writing_21st_Century.pdf?x-r=pcfile_d
Branda, L. A. (2009). El aprendizaje basado en problemas: De herejía artificial a res popularis. Educación Médica, 12(1), 11-23 doi: https://doi.org/10.4321/S1575-18132009000100004
Briones, G. (2006). Teorías de las ciencias sociales y de la educación: Epistemología (2ª Ed.). México: Trillas.
Díaz-Barriga, Á. (2011). Competencia en educación. Corrientes de pensamiento e implicaciones para el currículo y el trabajo en el aula. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación Superior, 2(5), 3-24. Recuperado de https://ries.universia.net/article/view/61/competencias-educacion-corrientes-pensamiento-implicaciones-curriculo-trabajo-aula
Douglas, E. (2014). Reading comprehension strategies for English language learners. Estados Unidos de Norteamérica: Universidad de Carolina del Norte.
Escamilla, J. (2010). Tecnología e innovación en educación (ED-4022). México: Universidad Virtual del Instituto Tecnológico de Monterrey.
Fullat, O. (2000). Filosofía de la educación (Vol. 2). Madrid: Síntesis.
Hernández-Ching, R. C. (2014). El modelo pedagógico a través del aprendizaje basado en problemas en un curso de investigación bibliográfica (Tesis de maestría). Tecnológico de Monterrey, México.
Instituto Cervantes. (2002). Marco común europeo de referencia para las lenguas: Aprendizaje, enseñanza y evaluación. Madrid: Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte. Recuperado de https://cvc.cervantes.es/ensenanza/biblioteca_ele/marco/cvc_mer.pdf
Latasa, I., Lozano, P. y Ocerinjauregi, N. (2012). Aprendizaje basado en problemas en currículos tradicionales: Beneficios e inconvenientes. Formación universitaria, 5(5), 15-26. doi: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062012000500003
Montoya, V. (2001-2002). Apuntes pedagógicos. Sincronía, 6(21). Recuperado de http://sincronia.cucsh.udg.mx/vmontoya.htm
Moore, T. W. (2009). Filosofía de la educación. México, DF: Trillas.
Ormrod, J. E. (2008). Aprendizaje humano. Madrid: Pearson Prentince Hall.
Richards, J. C., y Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667305
Rodríguez, H. (2008). Del constructivismo al construccionismo: Implicaciones educativas. Revista Educación y Desarrollo Social, 2(1), 71-89. doi: https://doi.org/10.18359/reds.710
Sánchez, I. R. y Ramis, F. J. (2004). Aprendizaje significativo basado en problemas. Revista Horizontes Educacionales, 9, 101-111. Recuperado de http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=97917171011
Universidad Nacional. (2012). Modelo pedagógico. Recuperado de http://www.documentos.una.ac.cr/bitstream/handle/unadocs/1763/modelo_pedagogico_UNA.141.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y
Universidad Nacional, Consejo Universitario. (2008). Procedimientos sobre los procesos de enseñanza y aprendizaje de la Universidad Nacional. Heredia: Autor. Recuperado de http://www.cu.una.ac.cr/index.php?option=com_remository&func=fileinfo&id=1112&Itemid=53
Universidad Nacional, Consejo Universitario (15 de agosto de 2009). Políticas para la incorporación de las tecnologías de información y la comunicación en los procesos académicos de la Universidad Nacional (30 de agosto de 2007, CONSACA-170-2007). UNA-Gaceta No. 11. Recuperado de http://www.documentos.una.ac.cr/bitstream/handle/unadocs/1302/TIC%20EN%20ACADEMIA.453.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Valenzuela, J. R. y Flores, M. (2012). Fundamentos de investigación educativa. México: Editorial Digital Tecnológico de Monterrey.
Villalpando, J. M. (1992). Filosofía de la Educación. México, DF: Porrúa.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
1. In case the submitted paper is accepted for publication, the author(s) FREELY, COSTLESS, EXCLUSIVELY AND FOR AN INDEFINITE TERM transfer copyrights and patrimonial rights to Universidad Nacional (UNA, Costa Rica). For more details check the Originality Statement and Copyright Transfer Agreement
2. REUTILIZATION RIGHTS: UNA authorizes authors to use, for any purpose (among them selfarchiving or autoarchiving) and to publish in the Internet in any electronic site, the paper´'s final version, both approved and published (post print), as long as it is done with a non commercial purpose, does not generate derivates without previous consentment and recognizes both publisher's name and authorship.
3. The submission and possible publication of the paper in the Educare Electronic Journal is ruled by the Journal’s editorial policies, the institutional rules of Universidad Nacional and the laws of the Republic of Costa Rica. Additionally, any possible difference of opinion or future dispute shall be settled in accordance with the mechanisms of Alternative Dispute Resolution and the Costa Rican Jurisdiction.
4. In all cases, it is understood that the opinions issued are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position and opinion of Educare, CIDE or Universidad Nacional, Costa Rica. It is also understood that, in the exercise of academic freedom, the authors have carried out a rogorous scientific-academic process of research, reflection and argumentation thar lays within the thematic scope of interest of the Journal.
5. The papers published by Educare Electronic Journal use a Creative Commons License: