Characterization of Autonomous Work in a Chilean English Pedagogy Program: Teachers’ and Freshmen’s Perspectives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.23-1.4Keywords:
Autonomous learning, autonomous work activities, autonomous work, learning, university studentAbstract
Autonomy in language learning is recognized as a basic skill language learners need to develop. This study describes the autonomous work activities university students carry out in a first-semester course of an English teaching program, and the amount of time they invest in each of these activities. Moreover, it describes the teachers’ perspective on students’ autonomous work. It is a descriptive mixed study with an exploratory scope. The study considers data generated through the application of a questionnaire and an in-depth interview to 48 freshmen from an English Pedagogy Program, as well as a questionnaire and a focus group applied to eight English teachers from the same program. The qualitative data were analyzed through content analysis method; and the quantitative data, through a frequency method of analysis. The analysis reveals that there is an imbalance between the time teachers estimate students devote to autonomous work and the real time students declare to invest in it. In relation to students autonomous work activities, it can be concluded that they concentrate on activities which are less stressful and the ones they do not need to interact with teachers. This study provides empiric information that could be useful to design courses that consider autonomous work.
References
Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language teaching. OUP Oxford.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. London: Longman.
Benson, P. (2007). Autonomy in language teaching and learning. Language Teaching, 40(1), 21-40. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003958
Benson, P., & Voller, P. (Eds.). (1997). Autonomy and independence in language learning. London: Longman.
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980) Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1-47. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/I.1.1
Carr, P. B. (1999). The measurement of resourcefulness intentions in the adult autonomous learner (Doctoral dissertation), George Washington University, Washington.
Cohen, L., Manion,L., & Morrison, K.(2008). Research methods in education (6a ed.). New York: Routledge. Recuperado de https://islmblogblog.files.wordpress.com/2016/05/rme-edu-helpline-blogspot-com.pdf
Cook, V. (2001). Using the first language in the classroom. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 57(3), 402-423. doi: https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.57.3.402
Dam, L. (1995). Learner autonomy 3: From theory to practice. Dublin: Authentik.
Dam, L., Eriksson, R., Little, D., Miliander, J., & Trebbi, T. (1990). Towards a definition of autonomy. In T. Trebbi (Ed.), Third Nordic Workshop on Developing Autonomous Learning in the FL Classroom (pp. 102-103). Bergen: University of Bergen. Retrieve from https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/al/research/groups/llta/research/past_projects/dahla/archive/trebbi-1990.pdf
Derrick, M. G. (2001). The measurement of an adult’s intention to exhibit persistence in autonomous learning (Doctoral dissertation). Dissertation Abstracts International, 62(05), 2533B. (UMI No. 3006915). The George Washington University.
Dickinson, L. (1987). Self-instruction in language learning. Cambridge: University Press.
Dickinson,L., & Carver, D. (1980). Learning how to Learn: Steps towards self-direction in foreign language learning in schools. ELT Journal, 35(1): 1-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/XXXV.1.1
Duijnhouwer, H. (2010). Feedback effects on student’s writing motivation, process and performance (Tesis doctoral). Universiteit Utrecht. Retrieve from http://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/43968/duijnhouwer.pdf?sequence=1
Fukuda, S., & Yoshida, H. (2012). Time is of the essence: Factors encouraging out-of-class study time. ELT journal, 67(1), 31-40. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccs054
Hasim, Z., & Zakaria, A. R. (2016). ESL teachers’ knowledge on learner autonomy. In F. Lumban, F. Hutagalung, A.
Razk, & Z. Hasim (Eds.), Knowledge, Service, Tourism & Hospitality (pp. 3-6). London: Taylor & Francis Group. Retrieve from https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315617312
Humphreys, G., & Wyatt, M. (2014). Helping Vietnamese university learners to become more autonomous. ELT Journal, 68(1), 52-63. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cct056
Hyland, F. (2004) Learning autonomously: Contextualising out-of-classe language learning. Language Awareness, 13(3), 180-202. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410408667094
Hymes, D. (1972). The scope of sociolinguistics. Georgetown University Monograph (Series on Languages and Linguistics), 25, 313-333.
Little, D. (2013). Language learner autonomy as agency and discourse: The challenge to learning technologies. Dublin, Ireland: Trinity College.
Mackey, A., & Gass, S.M. (2005). Second language research. Methodology and design. New York. Routledge.
Miles, M .B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new method. USA: Sage Publications.
Oxford, R. L. (1999). Relationships between second language learning strategies and language proficiency in the context of learner autonomy and self-regulation. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 38, 1999, 109-126. Retrieve from http://www.academia.edu/24255872/RELATIONSHIPS_BETWEEN_SECOND_LANGUAGE_LEARNING_STRATEGIES_AND_LANGUAGE_PROFICIENCY_IN_THE_CONTEXT_OF_LEARNER_AUTONOMY_AND_SELF-_REGULATION
Oxford, R. L. (2003). Toward a more systematic model of L2 learner autonomy. In D. Palfreyman, & R. C. Smith (Eds.), Learner autonomy across cultures: Language education perspectives (pp. 75-91). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230504684_5
Ponton, M. K., & Carr, P. B. (1999). A quasi-linear behavioural model and an application to self-directed learning. Hampton, Virginia: NASA Langley Research Center.
Ponton, M., K., & Rhea, N. E. (2006). Autonomous learning from a social cognitive perspective. New Horizons in Adult Education & Human Resource Development, 20(2), 38-49. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/nha3.10250
Reinders, H., & Balcikanli, C. (2011). Learning to foster autonomy: The role of teacher education materials. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 2(1), 15-25. Retrieve from https://sisaljournal.org/archives/mar11/reinders_balcikanli/
Saville-Troike, M. (2005). Introducing second language acquistion. Cambridge University Press, New York. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808838
Scharle, Á., & Szabó, A. (2001). Learner autonomy. A guide to developing learner responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, R. C. (2003). Pedagogy for autonomy as (becoming-) appropriate methodology. In D. Palfreyman, & R. C. Smith (Eds.), Learner autonomy across cultures (pp. 129-146). London: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230504684_8
Trebbi, T., & Barfield, A. (2009). Unveiling teacher and learner beliefs: An interview with Turid Trebbi. Independence, 47, 9-14. Retrieve from http://c-faculty.chuo-u.ac.jp/~andyb/Self/Beliefs.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
1. In case the submitted paper is accepted for publication, the author(s) FREELY, COSTLESS, EXCLUSIVELY AND FOR AN INDEFINITE TERM transfer copyrights and patrimonial rights to Universidad Nacional (UNA, Costa Rica). For more details check the Originality Statement and Copyright Transfer Agreement
2. REUTILIZATION RIGHTS: UNA authorizes authors to use, for any purpose (among them selfarchiving or autoarchiving) and to publish in the Internet in any electronic site, the paper´'s final version, both approved and published (post print), as long as it is done with a non commercial purpose, does not generate derivates without previous consentment and recognizes both publisher's name and authorship.
3. The submission and possible publication of the paper in the Educare Electronic Journal is ruled by the Journal’s editorial policies, the institutional rules of Universidad Nacional and the laws of the Republic of Costa Rica. Additionally, any possible difference of opinion or future dispute shall be settled in accordance with the mechanisms of Alternative Dispute Resolution and the Costa Rican Jurisdiction.
4. In all cases, it is understood that the opinions issued are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position and opinion of Educare, CIDE or Universidad Nacional, Costa Rica. It is also understood that, in the exercise of academic freedom, the authors have carried out a rogorous scientific-academic process of research, reflection and argumentation thar lays within the thematic scope of interest of the Journal.
5. The papers published by Educare Electronic Journal use a Creative Commons License:
The articles published by Educare Electronic Journal can be shared with a Creative Commons License: 
