Teaching Leadership in Professional Learning Communities: A Case Study From Two Public Schools in Mexico
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.25-1.4Keywords:
Teacher leadership, professional learning communities, elementary school teacherAbstract
This study aimed to describe the teaching leadership exercised by female teachers and principals in professional learning communities (CPA) in two public elementary schools. Naturalistic observation and conversational interviews were used under a qualitative multiple-case research approach. The development of the communities was in accordance with the organizational learning model, which includes initial organization, identification of problems, acquisition of knowledge, sharing, and use and dissemination of knowledge. The results show similarities and differences in the participation of the teachers and principals in both schools. Among the similarities, it was found that the experience helped the participants to grow and learn and that it is possible to stimulate leadership and collaboration within the framework of a professional learning community. Among the differences, the disposition of the principal was notorious. While in one of the schools, all the teachers participated, motivated by the principal, in the other school, they did not have the principal’s support, and the teachers participated spontaneously. It is possible to conclude that, in both schools, the emergence of teaching leadership was observed by giving participants a voice in their initiatives, ideas, experiences, creativity, and recognition of personal mastery. Finally, given the resistance and uncertainty that these processes generate, it is proposed that the collaboration in CPA and distributed leadership topics become the pillars of the school and be incorporated into the school culture, as well as in the initial and continuous training of teachers and principals.
References
Argyris, C. (2001). Sobre el aprendizaje organizacional. Oxford: University Press.
Bailey Moreno, J., Flores Fahara, M. y González Rivera, P. E. (2016). Aprendizaje docente y reestructuración de sus creencias en los procesos de desarrollo profesional y gestión escolar. Revista Actualidades Investigativas en Educación, 16(3), 1-25. https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/aie/article/view/25956
Boles, K. C. (1992). School restructuring by teachers: A study of the teaching project at the Edward Devotion School. Trabajo presentado en la Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
Carpenter, D. (2015). School culture and professional learning communities. International Journal of Educational Management, 29(5), 682-694. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-04-2014-0046
Darling-Hammond, L. (1996). The quiet revolution: Rethinking teacher development. Educational Leadership, 53(6), 4-10. Recuperado de http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/mar96/vol53/num06/toc.aspx
Gurr, D. y Day, C. (2014). Leading school successfully. En C. Day y D. Gurr (Eds.), Leading school successfully. Stories from the field (pp. 1-6). Routledge.
Day, C. y Harris, A. (2003). Teacher leadership, reflective practice and school improvement. En K. Leithwood y P. Hallinger (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 957-977). Boston: Springer-Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0375-9_32
DiBella, A. J. y Nevis, E. C. (1998). How organizations learn: An integrated strategy for building learning capability. Jossey-Bass.
DuFour, R. y Eaker, R. (1998). Professional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Elizondo Huerta, A. (2010). La nueva escuela, I. Dirección, liderazgo y gestión escolar. Paidós.
Erlandson, D. A., Harris, E. L., Skipper, B. L. y Allen, S. D. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry: A guide to methods. Sage.
Flores, E. y Flores, M. (2005). Public schools as learning communities: A multiple-case study of collaborative research in Northern Mexico. Trabajo presentado en la Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Montreal, Canadá.
Fullan, M. (2016). The new meaning of educational change (5.a ed.). Teachers College Press.
Gibbs, G. (2014). El análisis de datos cualitativos en investigación cualitativa. Morata.
Hargreaves, A. (2005). Profesorado, cultura y postmodernidad (Cambian los tiempos, cambia el profesorado). Morata.
Harris, A. (2003). Teacher leadership as distributed leadership: Heresy, fantasy or possibility? School Leadership & Management, 23(3), 313-324. https://doi.org/10.1080/1363243032000112801
Harris, A. y Jones, M. S. (2017). Professional learning communities: A strategy for school and system improvement. Wales Journal of Education, 19(1), 16-38. https://doi.org/10.16922/wje.19.1.2
Katzenmeyer, M. y Moller, G. (2009). Awakening the sleeping giant. Helping teachers develop as leaders. Corwin Press.
Lattimer, H. (2007). To help and not hinder. Educational Leadership, 65(1), 70-73. Recuperado de http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/sept07/vol65/num01/To-Help-and-Not-Hinder.aspx
Lincoln, Y. S y Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
Lortie, D. C. (1974). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. University of Chicago Press.
Louis, K. S. y Kruse, S. D. (1995). Professionalism and community: Perspectives on reforming urban schools. Corwin Press.
Martínez-Cruz, E. y Moreno-Olivos, T. (2017). La colegialidad docente en la escuela primaria mexicana: Análisis de sus prácticas. Revista Electrónica Educare, 21(2), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.21-2.6
Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D. J., Arredondo, D. E., Blackburn, G. J., Brandt, R. S., Moffett, C. A., Paynter, D. E., Pollock, J. E. y Whisler, J. S. (2011). Dimensions of learning teacher’s manual. ASCD.
Mason, J. (2018). Qualitative researching (3.a ed.). Sage.
Merriam, S. B. (2015). Qualitative research. A guide to design and implementation. Jossey Bass.
Reeves, D. B. (2009). Leading change in your school: How to conquer myths, build commitment, and get results. ASCD.
Rosenholtz, S. (1989). Teacher s ‘ workplace: The social organization of schools. Longman.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
Secretaría de Educación Pública. (7 de diciembre de 1982). Acuerdo 96. Que establece la organización y funcionamiento de las escuelas primarias. Diario Oficial de la Federación. http://dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=4784713&fecha=07/12/1982
Senge, P. M. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art & practice of the learning organization. Doubleday/ Currency.
Sepúlveda, F. y Aparicio, C. (2017). El desafío de los directores de escuelas chilenas: Liderando a partir de un enfoque instruccional hacia un enfoque distribuido. Revista Gestión de la Educación, 7(2), 1-19. Recuperado de https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/gestedu/article/view/30599
Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. Jossey-Bass.
Wasley, P. A. (1991). Teachers who lead: the rhetoric of reform and the realities of practice. Teachers College Press.
Wenger, E. (2001). Comunidades de práctica: Aprendizaje, significado e identidad. Paidós.
Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
1. In case the submitted paper is accepted for publication, the author(s) FREELY, COSTLESS, EXCLUSIVELY AND FOR AN INDEFINITE TERM transfer copyrights and patrimonial rights to Universidad Nacional (UNA, Costa Rica). For more details check the Originality Statement and Copyright Transfer Agreement
2. REUTILIZATION RIGHTS: UNA authorizes authors to use, for any purpose (among them selfarchiving or autoarchiving) and to publish in the Internet in any electronic site, the paper´'s final version, both approved and published (post print), as long as it is done with a non commercial purpose, does not generate derivates without previous consentment and recognizes both publisher's name and authorship.
3. The submission and possible publication of the paper in the Educare Electronic Journal is ruled by the Journal’s editorial policies, the institutional rules of Universidad Nacional and the laws of the Republic of Costa Rica. Additionally, any possible difference of opinion or future dispute shall be settled in accordance with the mechanisms of Alternative Dispute Resolution and the Costa Rican Jurisdiction.
4. In all cases, it is understood that the opinions issued are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position and opinion of Educare, CIDE or Universidad Nacional, Costa Rica. It is also understood that, in the exercise of academic freedom, the authors have carried out a rogorous scientific-academic process of research, reflection and argumentation thar lays within the thematic scope of interest of the Journal.
5. The papers published by Educare Electronic Journal use a Creative Commons License:
The articles published by Educare Electronic Journal can be shared with a Creative Commons License: 
