School Repetition: Relationship Between Self-Efficacy and Time Perspective in Peruvian Adolescents in Lima Metropolitan Area
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.26-2.8Keywords:
Self-efficacy, temporal perspective, repetition, students, high schoolAbstract
Introduction. School repetition is a perceived school phenomenon, but it has not been addressed in Latin America; this is evidenced in the low scientific production of the population concerning the variables self-efficacy and temporal perspective. In this sense, the present research aimed to examine the relationship between self-efficacy and temporal perspective in repeater students of secondary level. Method. The General Self-Efficacy Scale instrument, using its Peruvian version (Grimaldo Muchotrigo, 2005), and Temporary Perspective Inventory (Díaz-Morales, 2006) were applied. The sample consisted of 157 school students who repeated the school year at the primary or secondary level. Results. The results indicate a moderate and positive relationship between self-efficacy and the future dimension (r = 0.48), positive past (r = 0.32) and hedonistic present (r = 0.30), and a low and positive relationship between self-efficacy and negative past (r = 0.22) and fatalistic present (r = 0.27). Discussion. It is concluded that there is a moderate relationship between self-efficacy and prospects that should be examined in future studies, understanding that the population of repeater students is a group that has not yet been studied. In fact, these results have strong practical implications because they show the need to explore psychological variables in a population with grade repetition and to carry out approaches from the psycho-pedagogical departments of the educational centers.
References
Adelabu, D. H. (2007). Time perspective and school membership as correlates to academic achievement among African American adolescents. Adolescence, 42(167), 525-538. https://search.proquest.com/docview/195937251?pq-origsite=gscholar
Anderson, G. E., Whipple, A. D. y Jimerson, S. R. (2003). Grade retention: Achievement and mental health outcomes. Center for Development & Learning. http://www.cdl.org/articles/grade-retention-achievement-and-mental-health-outcomes/
Bandura, A. (1987). Pensamiento y acción. Fundamentos sociales. Martínez Roca.
Barca-Lozano, A., Almeida, L. S., Porto-Rioboo, A. M., Peralbo-Uzquiano, M. y Brenlla-Blanco, J. (2012). Motivación escolar y rendimiento: Impacto de metas académicas, de estrategias de aprendizaje y autoeficacia. Anales de Psicología, 28(3), 848-859. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.28.3.156101
Busot, I. (1997). Teoría de la auto-eficacia (A. Bandura): Un basamento para el proceso instruccional. Encuentro Educacional, 4(1), 53-63. https://produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/encuentro/article/view/1090/1092
Bruns, B. y Luque, J. (2014). Profesores excelentes: Cómo mejorar el aprendizaje en América Latina y el Caribe. Banco Mundial. https://virtualeduca.org/documentos/centrodocumentacion/2014/spanish-excellent-teachers-report.pdf
Cazau, P. (2006). Introducción a la investigación en ciencias sociales (3.a ed.). Buenos Aires.
Contreras, F., Espinosa, J. C., Esguerra, G., Haikal, A., Polanía, A. y Rodríguez, A. (2005). Autoeficacia, ansiedad y rendimiento académico en adolescentes. Diversitas: Perspectivas en Psicología, 1(2), 183-194. https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/diversitas/article/view/81/91
Díaz-Morales, J. F. (2006). Estructura factorial y fiabilidad del inventario de perspectiva temporal de Zimbardo. Psicothema, 18(3), 565-571. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/727/72718336.pdf
Grimaldo Muchotrigo, M. P. (2005). Propiedades psicométricas de la escala de autoeficacia general de Baesssler & Schwarzer. Cultura Neolatina, 23(19), 213-229. https://www.revistacultura.com.pe/portfolio-item/cultura-19/
Imbellone, A. y Laghi, F. (2016). The role of time perspective in social cognitive career theory of interests. Time & Society, 25(2), 334-354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X15577263
Jimerson, S. R. (1999). On the failure of failure: Examining the association Between Early Grade Retention and Education and employment outcomes during late adolescence. Journal of School Psychology, 37(3), 243-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4405(99)00005-9
Jimerson, S. R. (2001). Meta-analysis of grade retention research: Implications for practice in the 21st century. School Psychology Review, 30(3), 420-437. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2001.12086124
Mantilla Torres, L. G. (2019). Factores que inciden en la repitencia escolar en el Colegio Integrado Los Santos [Tesis de Maestría, Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga]. https://repository.unab.edu.co/handle/20.500.12749/7234
Marchesi Ullastres, A. (2003). El fracaso escolar en España. Fundación Alternativas. https://www.nodo50.org/movicaliedu/fracasoescolarespana.pdf
Ministerio de Educación. (24 de noviembre de 2019). Permanencia y progreso - Porcentaje de repetidores secundaria total.
Moreno, A. (2007). La adolescencia. UOC.
Pajares, F. y Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-beliefs and school sucess: Self-efficacy, self-concept, and school achievement. En R. J. Riding y S. G. Rayner (Eds.), Self perception (Vol. 2., pp. 239-266). Abex Publishing.
Papalia, D. E., Feldman, R. y Martorell, G. (2012). Desarrollo humano (12.a ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Ruiz Dodobara, F. (2005). Influencia de la autoeficacia en el ámbito académico. Revista Digital de Investigación en Docencia Universitaria, 1(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.19083/ridu.1.33
Torres, R. M. (1995). Repetición escolar: ¿Falla del alumno o falla del sistema? Evaluación, Aportes para la Capacitación, (1), 1-20. https://issuu.com/magda-mns/docs/torres1995re
Torres González, J. D., Acevedo Correa, D. y Gallo García, L. A. (2015). Causas y consecuencias de la deserción y repitencia escolar: Una visión general en el contexto latinoamericano. Cultura Educación y Sociedad, 6(2), 157-187. https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/culturaeducacionysociedad/article/view/904
Tuğran, E., Kocak, M., Mirtagioğlu, H., Yiğit, S. y Mendes, M. (2015). A simulation based comparison of correlation coefficients with regard to type I error rate and power. Journal of Data Analysis and Information Processing, 3(3), 87-101. https://doi.org/10.4236/jdaip.2015.33010
United Nations Children’s Fund. (2010). Informe Anual 2009. Autor. https://www.unicef.org/spanish/publications/index_53754.html
Vásquez Echeverría, A. (2011). Experiencia subjetiva del tiempo y su influencia en el comportamiento: Revisión y modelos. Psicología: Teoría e Pesquisa, 27(2), 215-223. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-37722011000200011
Ventura-León, J. L. (2016). Tamaño del efecto para la U de Mann-Whitney: Aportes al artículo de Valdivia-Peralta et al. Revista Chilena de Neuropsiquiatría, 54(4), 353-354. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-92272016000400010
Ventura-León, J. L. (2019). Tamaño del efecto para Kruskal-Wallis: Aportes al artículo de Domínguez-González et al. Investigación en Educación Médica, 8(30), 135-136. http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/iem/v8n30/2007-5057-iem-8-30-135.pdf
Ventura-León, J. L. y Caycho, T. (2017). Q de Cohen: Comparación de correlaciones entre muestras independientes en base a Urzúa et al. Revista Médica de Chile, 145(3), 411-412. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872017000300020
Wong, A. E., Dirghangi, S. R. y Hart, S. R. (2019). Self-concept clarity mediates the effects of adverse childhood experiences on adult suicide behavior, depression, loneliness, perceived stress, and life distress. Self and Identity, 18(3), 247-266. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2018.1439096
Zebardast, A., Besharat, M. A.y Hghighatgoo, M. (2011). The relationship between self-efficacy and time perspective in students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 935-938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.181
Zimbardo, P. y Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1271-1288. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07368-2_2
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
1. In case the submitted paper is accepted for publication, the author(s) FREELY, COSTLESS, EXCLUSIVELY AND FOR AN INDEFINITE TERM transfer copyrights and patrimonial rights to Universidad Nacional (UNA, Costa Rica). For more details check the Originality Statement and Copyright Transfer Agreement
2. REUTILIZATION RIGHTS: UNA authorizes authors to use, for any purpose (among them selfarchiving or autoarchiving) and to publish in the Internet in any electronic site, the paper´'s final version, both approved and published (post print), as long as it is done with a non commercial purpose, does not generate derivates without previous consentment and recognizes both publisher's name and authorship.
3. The submission and possible publication of the paper in the Educare Electronic Journal is ruled by the Journal’s editorial policies, the institutional rules of Universidad Nacional and the laws of the Republic of Costa Rica. Additionally, any possible difference of opinion or future dispute shall be settled in accordance with the mechanisms of Alternative Dispute Resolution and the Costa Rican Jurisdiction.
4. In all cases, it is understood that the opinions issued are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position and opinion of Educare, CIDE or Universidad Nacional, Costa Rica. It is also understood that, in the exercise of academic freedom, the authors have carried out a rogorous scientific-academic process of research, reflection and argumentation thar lays within the thematic scope of interest of the Journal.
5. The papers published by Educare Electronic Journal use a Creative Commons License:
The articles published by Educare Electronic Journal can be shared with a Creative Commons License: 
