The improvement of Academic Commitment through Mentoring and Service-Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.26-2.30Keywords:
High Education, academic engagement, service-learning, mentoringAbstract
Introduction. Higher education institutions constantly face challenges to improve their productivity, competitiveness, social impact, quality of education, and training delivered to students. Two of the responses to improve the quality of education and training offered to students and the social impact are service-learning and mentoring. The merit of both teaching interventions is that they allow a more effective connection between the curriculum, the social needs, and the professional world outside. Objective. This investigation aimed to explore the effectiveness of the Huelva Educa Program (HEP) to improve the level of academic commitment of participating students as mentors. Method. The sample comprised 54 students from the University of Huelva, selected through a sampling non-probability convenience. A quasi-experimental pretest-postest design involving undergraduate students was adopted, where the dependent variable was measured by the Questionnaire on the academic commitment of the university students and the HEP mentors’ workbook. Results. Self-reported results show that students have significantly increased behaviors related to participation in class, analyses of experiences and ideas, reflective analyses of experiences and ideas, critical reasoning, and tasks in a foreign language, among others. Conclusions. This work provides evidence on the program’s effectiveness for improving the preparation of their subjects, increasing academic achievement, or increasing their active and collaborative learning, recommending the importance of adopting this type of program.
References
Arco Tirado, J. L. y Fernández Martín, F. D. (2007). Evaluación de programas en educación no formal. En C. Torres Martín y J. A. Pareja Fernández de la Reguera (Coords.), La educación no formal y diferenciada. Fundamentos didácticos y organizativos (pp. 667-690). Editorial CCS.
Ato, M. (2010). Tipología de diseños cuasiexperimentales. En M. T. Anguera, J. Arnau, M. Ato, R. Martínez, J. Pascual y G. Vallejo (Eds.), Métodos de investigación en Psicología (pp. 245-269). Síntesis.
Boland, J. A. (2014). Orientations to civic engagement: Insights into the sustainability of a challenging pedagogy. Studies in Higher Education, 39(1), 180-195. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.648177
Brennan, M. B. (2016). Exploring a complex model of student engagement in middle school: Academic self-efficacy beliefs and achievement [Tesis doctoral, Wayne State University]. http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/oa_dissertations/1392/
Cardona-Rodríguez, A., Unceta-Satrustegui, K. y Barandiaran-Galdós, M. (2016). Comprehensive pertinence in the quality assessment of higher education. Cultura y Educación, 28(2), 344-358. https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2016.1158446
Cavazos Arroyo, J. y Encinas Orozco F. C. (2016). Influencia del engagement académico en la lealtad de estudiantes de posgrado: Un abordaje a través de un modelo de ecuaciones estructurales. Estudios Gerenciales, 32(140), 228-238. 10.1016/j.estger.2016.07.001
Chiva-Bartoll, O., Pallarés-Piquer, M. y Gil-Gómez, J. (2018). Aprendizaje-servicio y mejora de la personalidad eficaz en futuros docentes de educación física. Revista Complutense de Educación, 29(1), 181-197. https://doi.org/10.5209/RCED.52164
Christenson, S. L. y Reschly, A. L. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of school-family partnership. Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203876046
Coe, R. (2002). It´s the effect size, stupid. What effect size is and why it is important [Sesión de conferencia]. Annual Conference of the British Educational Research Association. Exeter. https://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00002182.htm
Consejo Económico y Social de España. (2017). Economía, trabajo y sociedad. Memoria sobre la situación socioeconómica y laboral. España 2016 (Resumen ejecutivo). Autor. http://www.ces.es/documents/10180/4959569/Memoria-CES-2016_RESUMEN-EJECUTIVO.pdf
Cress, C. M., Burack, C., Giles, D. E., Elkins, J. y Stevens, M. C. (2010). A promising connection: Increasing college access and success through civic engagement. Campus Compact. https://docs.google.com/viewerng/viewer?url=https://compact.org/wp-content/uploads/large/2015/04/A-Promising-Connection-corrected.pdf&hl=en
Fernández Martín, F. D., Arco Tirado, J. L., Justicia Justicia, F. y Pichardo Martínez, M. del C. (2010). Mejora de la calidad en la educación superior a través de la intervención psicopedagógica. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 68(246), 209-222. https://revistadepedagogia.org/lxviii/no-246/mejora-de-la-calidad-en-la-educacion-superior-a-traves-de-la-intervencion-psicopedagogica/101400010148/
Fitzgerald, H. E., Bruns, K., Sonka, S. T., Furco, A. y Swanson, L. (2012). The centrality of engagement in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 16(3), 1-27. https://openjournals.libs.uga.edu/jheoe/issue/view/87
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C. y Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Furco, A. y Holland, B. (2004). Institutionalizing service-learning in higher education: Issues and strategies for chief academic officers. En M. Langseth y W. M. Plater (Eds.), Public Work & the Aqcademy (pp. 23-29). Anker Publishing Company.
Gallini, S. M. y Moley, B. E. (2003). Service-learning and engagement, academic challenge, and retention. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 10(1), 5-14. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.3239521.0010.101
Herrera, C., Sipe, C. L. y McClanahan, W. S. (2000). Mentoring and relationship building. MENTOR/National Mentoring Partnership.
Hervás Torres, M., Fernández Martín, F. D., Arco Tirado, J. L. y Miñaca Laprida, M. I. (2017). Efectos de un programa de aprendizaje-servicio en el alumnado universitario. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 15(41), 126-146. https://doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.41.16049
Kahu, E. R. y Nelson, K. (2018). Student engagement in the educational interface: Understanding the mechanisms of student success. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(1), 58-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1344197
Knapp, T., Fisher, B. y Levesque-Bristol, C. (2010). Service-learning’s impact on college students’ commitment to future civic engagement, self-efficacy, and social empowerment. Journal of Community Practice, 18(2-3), 233-251. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705422.2010.490152
Kuh, G. D. (2009). The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2009(141), 5-20. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.283
Ledesma, R., Macbeth, G. y Cortada de Kohan, N. (2008). Tamaño del efecto: Revisión teórica y aplicaciones con el sistema estadístico ViSta. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 40(3), 425-439. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/805/80511493002.pdf
Martínez, R. (2010). El método de encuestas por muestreo: Conceptos básicos. En M. T. Anguera, J. Arnau, M. Ato, R. Martínez, J. Pascual y G. Vallejo (Eds.), Métodos de investigación en Psicología (pp. 385-431). Síntesis.
McIntyre, K. A. y Sellnow, D. D. (2014). A little bit can go a long way: An examination of required service in the basic communication course. Communication Teacher, 28(1), 57-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/17404622.2013.843012
Mentor/National Mentoring Partnership. (2005). Cómo construir un programa de mentoría exitoso utilizando los elementos de la práctica efectiva. Autor. https://www.yumpu.com/es/document/read/14137700/como-construir-un-programa-de-mentoria-exitoso-national-
Ministerio de Universidades. (2021). Datos y cifras del sistema universitario español. Publicación 2020-2021. Secretaría General Técnica del Ministerio de Universidades.
Mukminin, A. y McMahon, B. J. (2013). International graduate students’ cross - cultural academic engagement: Stories of indonesian doctoral students on an american campus. The Qualitative Report, 18(35), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2013.1473
National Survey of Student Engagement. (2018). Engagement insights: Survey findings on the quality of undergraduate education. Indiana University, Center for Postsecondary Research. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED604974.pdf
Pascarella, E. T. y Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How College affects students: A third decade of research. Jossey-Bass.
Rychen, D. S. y Hersh, L. H. (2002). Definición y selección de las competencias (DeSeCo): Fundamentos teóricos y conceptuales de las competencias. OCDE. https://www.deseco.admin.ch
Schaufelli, W., Martínez, I. M., Marques Pinto, A., Salanova, M. y Bakker, A. B. (2002). Burnout and engagement in university students: A cross-national study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(5), 464-481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022102033005003
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D. y Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.
Valles, M. S. (2000). Técnicas cualitativas de investigación social. Reflexión metodológica y práctica profesional. Síntesis. https://www.academia.edu/24809232/Valles_Tecnicas_Cualitativas_Investigacion_Social
Vieira, M. J., Vidal, J. y Barrio, S. (2007). Una herramienta de evaluación para comparar la experiencia académica de los estudiantes universitarios. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 25(2), 327-350. https://revistas.um.es/rie/article/view/96821
Yorio, P. L. y Ye, F. (2012). A meta-analysis on the effects of service-learning on the social, personal, and cognitive outcomes of learning. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 11(1), 9-27. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2010.0072
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
1. In case the submitted paper is accepted for publication, the author(s) FREELY, COSTLESS, EXCLUSIVELY AND FOR AN INDEFINITE TERM transfer copyrights and patrimonial rights to Universidad Nacional (UNA, Costa Rica). For more details check the Originality Statement and Copyright Transfer Agreement
2. REUTILIZATION RIGHTS: UNA authorizes authors to use, for any purpose (among them selfarchiving or autoarchiving) and to publish in the Internet in any electronic site, the paper´'s final version, both approved and published (post print), as long as it is done with a non commercial purpose, does not generate derivates without previous consentment and recognizes both publisher's name and authorship.
3. The submission and possible publication of the paper in the Educare Electronic Journal is ruled by the Journal’s editorial policies, the institutional rules of Universidad Nacional and the laws of the Republic of Costa Rica. Additionally, any possible difference of opinion or future dispute shall be settled in accordance with the mechanisms of Alternative Dispute Resolution and the Costa Rican Jurisdiction.
4. In all cases, it is understood that the opinions issued are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position and opinion of Educare, CIDE or Universidad Nacional, Costa Rica. It is also understood that, in the exercise of academic freedom, the authors have carried out a rogorous scientific-academic process of research, reflection and argumentation thar lays within the thematic scope of interest of the Journal.
5. The papers published by Educare Electronic Journal use a Creative Commons License:
The articles published by Educare Electronic Journal can be shared with a Creative Commons License: 
