Effects of Parental Mediation, Digital Skills, Gender and Socioeconomic Status on the Internet Uses of Children and Adolescents
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.26-1.1Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to research the effects of parental mediation, digital skills, gender, and socioeconomic status on the Internet uses of children and adolescents between 9 and 17 years old. Method: The Kids Online survey (Pérez-Sánchez, 2019) was applied to a national representative sample of 1008 Costa Rican children and adolescents, 50.6% women and an average age of 12.75 (SD = 2.55). A stratified random sample was followed. Structural equation modeling and moderation, and mediation analysis were conducted. Conclusions: Results show that specific parental mediation types can contribute to promote or inhibit different Internet uses, resulting in active mediation as the main promoter and monitoring mediation as the main inhibitor, above restrictive mediation. Digital skills have a partial mediation effect in the association between types of mediation and Internet uses. This effect helps to counteract the limiting or restrictive effects of mediation on opportunities. Furthermore, a moderator effect of gender and socioeconomic status in the relationship between the type of mediation and Internet uses was found.
References
Cabello, P., Claro, M., Lazcano-Peña, D. y Antezana, L. (2018). La inclusión digital de niños y adolescentes chilenos desde la perspectiva de usos y habilidades. En E. Jiménez, M. Garmendia y M. Á. Casado (Coords.), Entre selfies y whatsapps. Oportunidades y riesgos para la infancia y la adolescencia conectada (pp. 259-278). Gedisa.
Cabello, P., Claro, M., Lazcano, D., Cabello-Hutt, T., Antezana, L. y Ochoa, J. M. (2019). Chilean children’s internet use and online activities: A brief report. Global Kids Online http://globalkidsonline.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Chile-findings-report-FINAL.pdf
Cabello-Hutt, T., Cabello, P. y Claro, M. (2018). Online opportunities and risks for children and adolescents: The role of digital skills, age, gender and parental mediation in Brazil. New Media & Society, 20(7), 2411-2431. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817724168
EU Kids Online. (2014). Research toolkit. LSE. http://globalkidsonline.net/tools/survey/
Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 408-420. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750903310360
Helsper, E. J., van Deursen, A. J. A. M. y Eynon, R. (2015) From digital skills to tangible outcomes: Full questionnaire. https://www.lse.ac.uk/media-and-communications/assets/documents/research/projects/disto/From-Digital-Skills-to-Tangible-Outcomes-Full-Questionnaire..pdf
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J. y Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60. https://academic-publishing.org/index.php/ejbrm/article/view/1224/1187
Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Görzig, A. y Ólafsson, K. (2011). Risks and safety on the internet: The perspective of european children. Full finding and policy implications from the EU Kids Online survey of 9-16 year olds and their parents in 25 countries. EU Kids Online. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/33731/
Livingstone, S., Lemish, D., Lim, S. S., Bulger, M., Cabello, P., Claro, M., Cabello-Hutt, T., Khalil, J., Kumpulainen, K., Nayar, U. S., Nayar, P., Park, J., Tan, M. M. Prinsloo, J. y Wei, B. (2017). Global perspectives on children’s digital opportunities: An emerging research and policy agenda. Pediatrics, 140(Supplement 2), S137-S141. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-1758S
Livingstone, S., Ólafsson, K., Helsper, E. J., Lupiáñez‐Villanueva, F., Veltri, G. A. y Folkvord, F. (2017). Maximizing opportunities and minimizing risks for children online: The role of digital skills in emerging strategies of parental mediation. Journal of Communication, 67(1), 82-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12277
Livingstone, S., Mascheroni, G. y Staksrud, E. (2018). European research on children’s internet use: Assessing the past and anticipating the future. New Media & Society, 20(3), 1103-1122. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816685930
Livingstone, S. y Third, A. (2017). Children and young people’s rights in the digital age: An emerging agenda. New Media & Society, 19(5), 657-670. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816686318
Mascheroni, G. y Ólafsson, K. (2016). The mobile internet: Access, use, opportunities and divides among european children. New Media & Society, 18(8), 1657-1679. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814567986
Molina, J. A., Campaña, J. C. y Ortega, R. (2017). Children’s interaction with the internet: Time dedicated to communications and games, Applied Economics Letters, 24(6), 359-364, https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2016.1192270
Pérez-Sánchez, R. (2019). Informe primera encuesta Kids Online Costa Rica. Niñas, niños y adolescentes en la internet. Fundación Paniamor; IIP, UCR. http://www.iip.ucr.ac.cr/es/publicaciones/publicacion-de-investigador/informe-primera-encuesta-kids-online-costa-rica-abril
Rodríguez de Dios, I., van Oosten, J. e Igartua, J. J. (2018). A study of the relationship between parental mediation and adolescents’ digital skills, online risks and online opportunities. Computers in Human Behavior, 82, 186-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.012
Rucker, D. D., Preacher, K. J., Tormala, Z. L. y Petty, R. E. (2011). Mediation analysis in social psychology: Current practices and new rsecommendations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(6), 359-371. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00355.x
Subrahmanyam, K. y Smahel, D. (2011). Digital youth. The role of media in development. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6278-2
Sonck, N., Nikken, P. y de Haan, J. (2013). Determinants of internet mediation: A comparison of the reports by dutch parents and children. Journal of Children and Media, 7(1), 96-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2012.739806
Valkenburg, P. M., Piotrowski, J. T., Hermanns, J. y de Leeuw, R. (2013). Development and validation of the perceived parental media mediation scale: A self-determination perspective. Human Communication Research, 39(4), 445-469. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12010
Valkenburg, P. M., Sumter, S. R. y Peter, J. (2011). Gender differences in online and offline self‐disclosure in pre‐adolescence and adolescence. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 29(2), 253-269. https://doi.org/10.1348/2044-835X.002001
Van Deursen, A. J. A. M. y van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2014). The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New Media & Society, 16(3), 507-526. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813487959
van Dijk, J. A. G. M. y van Deursen, A. J. A. M. (2014). Digital skills: Unlocking the information society. Palgrave-Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137437037
Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., Jr., y Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197-206. https://doi.org/10.1086/651257
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
1. In case the submitted paper is accepted for publication, the author(s) FREELY, COSTLESS, EXCLUSIVELY AND FOR AN INDEFINITE TERM transfer copyrights and patrimonial rights to Universidad Nacional (UNA, Costa Rica). For more details check the Originality Statement and Copyright Transfer Agreement
2. REUTILIZATION RIGHTS: UNA authorizes authors to use, for any purpose (among them selfarchiving or autoarchiving) and to publish in the Internet in any electronic site, the paper´'s final version, both approved and published (post print), as long as it is done with a non commercial purpose, does not generate derivates without previous consentment and recognizes both publisher's name and authorship.
3. The submission and possible publication of the paper in the Educare Electronic Journal is ruled by the Journal’s editorial policies, the institutional rules of Universidad Nacional and the laws of the Republic of Costa Rica. Additionally, any possible difference of opinion or future dispute shall be settled in accordance with the mechanisms of Alternative Dispute Resolution and the Costa Rican Jurisdiction.
4. In all cases, it is understood that the opinions issued are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position and opinion of Educare, CIDE or Universidad Nacional, Costa Rica. It is also understood that, in the exercise of academic freedom, the authors have carried out a rogorous scientific-academic process of research, reflection and argumentation thar lays within the thematic scope of interest of the Journal.
5. The papers published by Educare Electronic Journal use a Creative Commons License: