Teacher Professional Development: Perspectives from a Research Experience with Teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.27-2.15870Keywords:
Teacher development, qualitative applied research, professional learning communitiesAbstract
Objective. To analyze the scope of realization of professional learning communities with teachers and management teams who implemented that intervention during two years in a high school in the south of Chile. Methodology. In this applied research, teachers participated in phases of diagnosis of training needs for professional development. Based on this, a proposal of work sessions theoretically and methodologically linked to the professional learning communities was structured. The proposal was designed and implemented together with the school’s management team. After the implementation, the study followed with qualitative interviews and focal groups about the experience conducted with 17 participants; these instances were analyzed by thematic analysis following the phenomenological approach. Analysis of Results. The analyses allowed the emergence of three elements related to professional learning and agency capacity. It was especially evident that teachers recognized their capacity to take charge of their professional learning by considering work routines, focusing on learning as a positive factor among teachers and being important in all phases of a collaborative work design. Conclusions. The findings show that, although specific stimuli, spaces, and moments are required to encourage teachers’ work, it is possible to improve based on their own capacities, i.e., within each establishment, there is the possibility of achieving learning for all. This call is addressed to pedagogical leaders, who can modify their roles and adapt to professionals recognized as agents of change.
References
Aparicio Molina, C. & Sepúlveda López F. (2018). Análisis del modelo de Comunidades Profesionales de Aprendizaje a partir de la indagación en experiencias de colaboración entre profesores. Estudios Pedagógicos, 44(3), 55-73. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07052018000300055
Aparicio Molina, C. & Sepúlveda López, F. (2019). Trabajo colaborativo docente: Nuevas perspectivas para el desarrollo docente. Psicologia Escolar e Educacional, 23, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-35392019017926
Apple, M. W. (2018). ¿Puede la educación cambiar la sociedad? Lom Ediciones.
Barrier-Ferreira, J. (2008). Producing commodities or educating children? Nurturing the personal growth of students in the face of standardized testing. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 81(3), 138-140. https://doi.org/10.3200/TCHS.81.3.138-140
Biesta, G., Priestley, M., & Robinson, S. (2015). The role of beliefs in teacher agency. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 624-640, https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1044325
Blanchard, K. (2007). Leading at a higher level. Blanchard on leadership and creating high performing organizations. FT Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage.
DuFour, R., DuFour, R., Eaker, R., & Many, T. (2010). Learning by doing: A handbook for professional learning communities at work. Solution Tree Press.
DuFour, R. & Mattos, M. (2013). How do principals really improve schools? Educational Leadership, 70(7), 34-40. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1015452
Durksen, T. L., Klassen, R. M., & Daniels, L. M. (2017). Motivation and collaboration: The keys to a developmental framework for teachers' professional learning. Teaching and Teacher Education (67), 53-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.05.011
Finkel, E. (2010). Gearing up for the new assessment. District Administration, 46(7), 78-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.05.011
Graham, P. & Ferriter, W. M. (2010). Building a professional learning community at work. A guide to the first year. Solution Tree Press.
Hargreaves, A. & Fullan, M. (2014). Capital profesional. Morata.
Hargreaves, A. & O´Connor, M. T. (2018). Collaborative professionalism. When teaching together means learning for all. Corwin Press.
Krieg, J. M. (2011). Which students are left behind? The racial impacts of the no child left behind act. Economics of Education Review, 30(4), 654-664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.02.004
Kõiv, K., Liik, K., & Heidmets, M. (2019), School leadership, teacher’s psychological empowerment and work-related outcomes. International Journal of Educational Management, 33(7), 1501-1514. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-08-2018-0232
Lobascher, S. (2011). What are the potential impacts of high-stakes testing on literacy education in Australia? Literacy Learning: The Middle Years, 19(2), 9-19. https://eds.s.ebscohost.com/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=0&sid=03256516-1e2a-4c51-8768-4204aa0751e3%40redis
Mieles Barrera, M. D., Tonon, G., & Alvarado Salgado, S. V. (2012). Investigación cualitativa: El análisis temático para el tratamiento de la información desde el enfoque de la fenomenología social. Universitas Humanística, (74), 195-225. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0120-48072012000200010&lng=en&tlng=es
Ministerio de Educación. (2016, 1 dfe abril). Ley 20.903. Crea el Sistema de Desarrollo Profesional Docente y Modifica otras normas. Biblioteca del Congreso Ncional de Chile. https://www.bcn.cl/leychile/navegar?idNorma=1087343&idParte=
Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económicos (OECD). (2019). TALIS 2018 Results (Vol. 1): Teachers and school leaders as lifelong learners. https://www.oecd.org/education/talis-2018-results-volume-i-1d0bc92a-en.htm
Packer, M. (2013). La ciencia de la investigación cualitativa. Ediciones Uniandes.
Rigby, J. G., Woulfin, S. L., & März, V. (2016), Understanding how structure and agency influence education policy implementation and organizational change, American Journal of Education, 122(3), 295-302. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/685849?journalCode=aje
Sandín Estebam, M. P. (2003). Investigación cualitativa en educación: Fundamentos y tradiciones. McGraw-Hill.
Sawyer, I. & Ramirez Stukey, M. (2019). Professional learning redefined. An evidence-based guide. Corwin Press.
Schlechty, P. C. (2011). The threat of accountabalism. Educational Leadership, 69(1), 80. https://www.ascd.org/el/articles/the-threat-of-accountabalism
Sen, A. (1999). Nuevo examen de la desigualdad. Alianza Editorial.
Tardif, M. (2004). Los saberes del docente y su desarrollo profesional. Narcea.
Vaillant, D. (2019). Directivos y comunidades de aprendizaje docente: un campo en construcción. REVEDUC. Revista Eletrônica de Educação, 13(1), 87-106. https://doi.org/10.14244/198271993073
Van Manen, M. (2003). Investigación educativa y experiencia vivida. Idea Books.
Wills, J. S. & Sandholtz, J. H. (2009). Constrained professionalism: Dilemmas of teaching in the face of test-based accountability. Teachers College Record, 111(4), 1065-1114. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ836005
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
1. In case the submitted paper is accepted for publication, the author(s) FREELY, COSTLESS, EXCLUSIVELY AND FOR AN INDEFINITE TERM transfer copyrights and patrimonial rights to Universidad Nacional (UNA, Costa Rica). For more details check the Originality Statement and Copyright Transfer Agreement
2. REUTILIZATION RIGHTS: UNA authorizes authors to use, for any purpose (among them selfarchiving or autoarchiving) and to publish in the Internet in any electronic site, the paper´'s final version, both approved and published (post print), as long as it is done with a non commercial purpose, does not generate derivates without previous consentment and recognizes both publisher's name and authorship.
3. The submission and possible publication of the paper in the Educare Electronic Journal is ruled by the Journal’s editorial policies, the institutional rules of Universidad Nacional and the laws of the Republic of Costa Rica. Additionally, any possible difference of opinion or future dispute shall be settled in accordance with the mechanisms of Alternative Dispute Resolution and the Costa Rican Jurisdiction.
4. In all cases, it is understood that the opinions issued are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position and opinion of Educare, CIDE or Universidad Nacional, Costa Rica. It is also understood that, in the exercise of academic freedom, the authors have carried out a rogorous scientific-academic process of research, reflection and argumentation thar lays within the thematic scope of interest of the Journal.
5. The papers published by Educare Electronic Journal use a Creative Commons License:
The articles published by Educare Electronic Journal can be shared with a Creative Commons License: 
