Development of an Analysis Model from the Perspectives of Science, Individual and Society in the Teaching of Science
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.21-1.16Keywords:
Curriculum analysis, science and society, education in science, teaching of scienceAbstract
The basic vision of learning science has changed as scientific culture concepts evolution and the nature of the teaching of science go along. From a model essentially based on information acquisition, science instruction has included the practice of the science method when the importance of emphasizing the development of personal skills, thinking processes, and action was considered. The concern about citizens’ education in matters referring to the relationship between science and society and enlightened social participation demanded a special attention in investigation and in students’ participation in issues related to urban, natural, and technological environment. This research seeks to develop an integrative model of curriculum organizations based on these three axes or perspectives: science, individual, and society. A matrix enabling the analysis of curricular proposals and organization plans of didactic units is built, as well as the observation of teachers’ representations in the teaching of science.
References
Adey, P. e Shayer, M. (1994). Really raising standards. Cognitive intervention and academic achievement. Londres: Routledge.
Adey, P., Shayer, M. e Yates, C. (1989). Thinking science: The curriculum materials of the cognitive acceleration through science education (CASE) project. Basingstoke, Londres: Macmillan Education.
Barbosa, M. V., Carmo, J. M. B., Cruz, M. N., Guimarães, H. M. e Pereira, M. P. (1989). Algumas reflexões sobre o ensino das ciências no 3º ciclo do ensino básico. Revista de Ciência, Tecnologia e Sociedade, 8-9, 74-87.
Cachapuz, A., Praia, J. e Jorge, M. (2004). Da Educação em Ciência às orientações para o ensino das ciências: Um repensar epistemológico. Ciência & Educação, 10(3), 363-381. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-73132004000300005
Chacon, E. P., Ribeiro, C. M. R. e Borges, M. N. (2016) “Jogo da Radiação”: Elaboração de um software educativo articulado ao contexto CTSA e a percepção docente e discente. Ensino de Ciências e Tecnologia em Revista 6(1), 1-14. Recuperado de http://srvapp2s.urisan.tche.br/seer/index.php/encitec/article/view/1632/906
Ferreira-Gauchía, C., Vilches, A. y Gil-Pérez, D. (2012). Concepciones docentes acerca de la naturaleza de la tecnología y de las relaciones ciencia, tecnología, sociedad y ambiente en la educación tecnológica. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 30(2), 253-272. Recuperado de http://www.uv.es/vilches/Documentos/EdlC%202012.pdf
Harms, N. (1980). VIII. Project synthesis: Summary and implications for teachers. In N. C. Harms e R. E. Yager (Eds.), What research says to the science teacher (Vol. 3, pp. 113-127. Washington: National Science Teachers Association-NSTA.
Hoffstein, A. (1985). Science: Key concepts. Em T. Husén e T.N Postlethwaite (Eds.), The International encyclopedia of education (Vol. 8, pp. 4465-4466). New York: Pergamon Press.
Hurd, P. D. (1970). Scientific enlightenment for an age of science. The Science Teacher, 37(1), 13-15.
Hurd, P. D. (1980). III. Biology education. In N. C. Harms e R. E. Yager (Eds.), What research says to the science teacher (Vol. 3, pp. 12-32), Washington: National Science Teachers Association-NSTA.
Hurd, P. D. (1991). Closing the educational gaps between science, technology, and society. Theory Into Practice, 30(4), 251-259. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849109543509
Hurd, P. D. (1998). Scientific literacy: New minds for a changing world. Science Education, 82(3), 407-416. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199806)82:3<407::AID-SCE6>3.0.CO;2-G
Kahl, S. e Harms, N. (1980). II. Project synthesis: purpose, organization and procedures. In N. C. Harms e R. E. Yager (Eds.), What research says to the science teacher (Vol. 3, pp. 5-11). Washington: National Science Teachers Association.
Klopfer, L. E. (1985). Scientific literacy. Em T. Husén e T. N. Postlethwaite. International encyclopedia of education (Vol. 8, pp. 4478-4479). New York: Pergamon Press.
Levy, T. (1999). O carácter problemático do termo tecnologia, ou como navegar entre a utopia e a distopia. Revista de Educação, 8(2), 3-13.
Lewis, J. L. (1981). Science in society. Teacher’s guide. Londres: The Association for Science Education.
Miguéns, M., Serra, P., Simões, H. e Roldão, M. C. (1996). Dimensões formativas de disciplinas do ensino básico. Ciências da natureza. Lisboa: Instituto de Inovação Educacional.
Monteiro, A. (1977). Educação. Acto político. Lisboa: Livros Horizonte.
Ozdem-Yilmaz, Y e Cavas, B. (2016). Pedagogically desirable science education: Views on inquiry-based Science Education in Turkey. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(4), 506-522. Recuperado de http://www.scientiasocialis.lt/jbse/files/pdf/vol15/506-522.Ozdem-Yilmaz_JBSE_Vol.15_No.4.pdf
Pereira, M. P. (Coord.). (1992). Didáctica das ciências da natureza. Lisboa: Universidade Aberta.
Piel, E. J. (1980). VII. Interaction of science, technology, and society in secondary schools. In N. C. Harms e R. E. Yager (Eds.), What research says to the science teacher (Vol. 3, pp. 94-112. Washington: National Science Teachers Association-NSTA.
Porlán, R. e Martín, R. (2004). The conceptions of in-service and prospective primary school teachers about the teaching and learning of science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 15(1), 39-62. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JSTE.0000031462.40615.56
Porlán, R., Rivero, A. e Martin, R. (1998). Conocimiento profisional y epistemología de los profesores, II: Estudios empíricos y conclusiones. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 16(2), 271-288. Recuperado de https://ddd.uab.cat/pub/edlc/02124521v16n2/02124521v16n2p271.pdf
Reis, P. (2013). Da discussão à ação sociopolítica sobre controvérsias sócio-científicas: Uma questão de cidadania. Ensino de Ciências e Tecnologia em Revista, 3(1), 1-10. Recuperado de http://repositorio.ul.pt/bitstream/10451/9577/3/DA%20DISCUSS%C3%83O%20%C3%80%20A%C3%87%C3%83O.pdf
Roso, C. C. e Auler, D. (2016) A participação na construção do currículo: Práticas educativas vinculadas ao movimento CTS. Ciência & Educação (Bauru), 22(2), 371-389. Recuperado de http://www.scielo.br/pdf/ciedu/v22n2/1516-7313-ciedu-22-02-0371.pdf
Rubba, P. A., Jr. (1982). Scientific literacy: The decision is ours. In J. Staver (Ed.), An analysis of the secondary school science curriculum and directions for action in the 1980’s (pp. 45-62). Ohio: AETS.
Sá, J. e Varela, P. (2007). Das ciências experimentais à literacia. Porto: Porto Editora.
Sá, J., Varela, P., Carvalho, G. S. e Guimarães, F. (1999). Manual do professor para o ensino experimental no 1º ciclo. Um projecto de investigação-acção centrado na escola. In R.V. Castro, A. Rodrigues, J. L. Silva e M. L. D. Sousa (Eds.), Manuais escolares. Estatuto, funções, história: Actas do I encontro internacional sobre manuais escolares (pp. 441-458). Braga: Instituto de Educação e Psicologia, Universidade do Minho.
Santos, M. E. (1998). Mudança conceptual na sala de aula. Um desafio pedagógico epistemologicamente fundamentado (2ª ed.). Lisboa: Livros Horizonte.
Santos, W. L. P. (2007) Educação científica na perspectiva de letramento como prática social: Funções, princípios e desafios. Revista Brasileira de Educação, 12(36), 474-492. Recuperado de http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rbedu/v12n36/a07v1236.pdf
Schwab, J. J. e Klinckman, E. (1970). Manual do professor de biologia (BSCS). Lisboa: Gulbenkian.
Science/technology/society: A new effort for providing appropriate science for all [Editorial]. (1990). Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 20, 249-250. doi: 10.1177/0270467690010005-601
Solís, E., Porlán, R. e Rivero, A. (2012). ¿Cómo representar el conocimiento curricular de los profesores de ciencias y su evolución? Enseñanza de las Ciencias. Revista de Investigación y Experiencias Didácticas, 30(3), 9-30. Recuperado de http://www.raco.cat/index.php/Ensenanza/article/viewFile/285681/373653.
Tamir, P. (1989). Science education: Curriculum reform. In T. Husén e T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education (Vol. suplementary I, pp. 664-8). Oxford: Pergamon Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730730106
Tuay, R. N. & Porras, Y. A. (2015). Representaciones de la naturaleza de la ciencia y la tecnología desde la perspectiva CTSA de profesores en escuelas normales superiores. Revista Científica, 3(23), 30-42. Recuperado de http://revistas.udistrital.edu.co/ojs/index.php/revcie/article/view/9048/11027
Valente, M. O., Gaspar, A., Lobo, A., Salema, M.H., Morais, M.M. e Cruz, M.N. (1989). Aprender a pensar. Lisboa: Departamento de Educação da FCUL, Projecto Dianoia.
Valente, M. O., Gaspar, A., Rainho, M.A.., Salema, M.H., Santos, M.E., Morais, M.M. e Cruz, M.N. (1991). Programas para Aprender a Pensar. Lisboa: Departamento de Educação da FCUL, Projecto Dianoia.
Welch, W. W. (1980). V. Inquiry in school science. Em N. C. Harms e R. E. Yager (Eds.), What research says to the science teacher (Vol. 3, pp. 53-72). Washington: National Science Teachers Association. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1980.tb09554.x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
1. In case the submitted paper is accepted for publication, the author(s) FREELY, COSTLESS, EXCLUSIVELY AND FOR AN INDEFINITE TERM transfer copyrights and patrimonial rights to Universidad Nacional (UNA, Costa Rica). For more details check the Originality Statement and Copyright Transfer Agreement
2. REUTILIZATION RIGHTS: UNA authorizes authors to use, for any purpose (among them selfarchiving or autoarchiving) and to publish in the Internet in any electronic site, the paper´'s final version, both approved and published (post print), as long as it is done with a non commercial purpose, does not generate derivates without previous consentment and recognizes both publisher's name and authorship.
3. The submission and possible publication of the paper in the Educare Electronic Journal is ruled by the Journal’s editorial policies, the institutional rules of Universidad Nacional and the laws of the Republic of Costa Rica. Additionally, any possible difference of opinion or future dispute shall be settled in accordance with the mechanisms of Alternative Dispute Resolution and the Costa Rican Jurisdiction.
4. In all cases, it is understood that the opinions issued are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position and opinion of Educare, CIDE or Universidad Nacional, Costa Rica. It is also understood that, in the exercise of academic freedom, the authors have carried out a rogorous scientific-academic process of research, reflection and argumentation thar lays within the thematic scope of interest of the Journal.
5. The papers published by Educare Electronic Journal use a Creative Commons License:
The articles published by Educare Electronic Journal can be shared with a Creative Commons License: 
