Measurement of Listening and Reading Comprehension Skills in Students of English Pedagogy in a Chilean University
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.20-1.8Keywords:
Disciplinary knowledge, standardized tests, reading comprehension, listening comprehension, Common European Framework of Reference.Abstract
The article presents the results of an investigation aimed at measuring the skills of reading comprehension and listening comprehension of English pedagogy students in a Chilean university. Three standardized tests from ESOL Cambridge University were applied to students in second, third and fifth years, respectively: Key English Test (KET), Preliminary English Test (PET) and First Certificate Exam (FCE). The collected data were analyzed by using SPSS program through descriptive statistics. In addition, these results were supplemented with information gathered from three focus groups which aimed at determining the main difficulties arousing during the execution of the tests. The results revealed that students showed problems in their listening comprehension and reading comprehension abilities in KET and FCE tests, where the latter obtained the lowest level of achievement. On the other hand, in the PET exam, approval scores reached the best level. In the focus groups, students expressed that their main difficulties were: adequate understanding of instructions for each task, high level of concentration required for these exams, and little exposure to trials of this type of measuring instruments. The article raises a possible explanation for the low results in two of the tests, using the concept of plateau effect in the process of learning a language. It concludes with a reflection on the English teacher initial training in Chile, the importance of knowing the content and the challenges facing the educational system, as well as the training institutions based on the new pedagogical standards established by the Ministry of Education.References
Bailey, K. M. (1990). The Use of DiaryStudies in TeacherEducationPrograms [El uso de diarios en programas de formación de profesores]. En J. C. Richards y D. Nunan (Eds.), Second LanguageTeacher Education [Educación de profesores de Segundas Lenguas] (pp. 215-226). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Banegas, D. L. (2009). Content Knowledge in Teacher Education: Where Professionalisation Lies [El conocimiento del contenido en la educación docente: Dónde reside la profesionalización]. ELTED, 12, 44-51. Recuperado de http://www.elted.net/5%20Dario%20Luis%20Banegas.pdf
Barnes, A. (2002). Maintaining Language Skills in Pre-Service Training for oreign Language Teachers [Manteniendo las habilidades lingüísticas en la formación inicial de profesores de Idiomas Extranjeros]. En H. Trappex-Lomax y G. Ferguson (Eds.), Language in Language Teacher Education Education [El idioma en la educación del profesor de Idioma] (pp. 199-217). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/lllt.4.14bar
Benavides, J. E. (2011). Las pruebas estandarizadas como forma de medición del nivel de inglés en la educación colombiana. En J. A. Bastidas y G. Muñoz (Eds.), Fundamentos para el desarrollo profesional de los profesores de Inglés (pp. 19-38). San Juan de Pasto: Graficolor.
Borg, S. (2003). Teacher Cognition in Language Teaching: A Review of Research on What Language Teachers Think, Know, Believe, and Do [La cognición del profesor en la Enseñanza del Idioma: Una revisión acerca de lo que los profesores piensan, conocen, creen y hacen]. Language Teaching, 36(2), 81-109. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0261444803001903
Council of Europe (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment [Marco común europeo de referencia para lenguajes: Aprendizaje, enseñanza y evaluación]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Recuperado de http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/source/framework_en.pdf
Instituto Cervantes (2002). Marco común europeo de referencia para las lenguas: Aprendizaje, enseñanza, evaluación. Madrid: Autor. Recuperado de http://cvc.cervantes.es/ensenanza/biblioteca_ele/marco/cvc_mer.pdf
Ministerio de Educación. (2012). Estándares orientadores para carreras de pedagogía en educación media. Recuperada de http://www.mineduc.cl/usuarios/cpeip/File/librosestandaresvale/libromediafinal.pdf
Ministerio de Educación. (2014). Estándares orientadores para carreras de pedagogía en inglés. Estándares disciplinarios. Estándares pedagógicos. Recuperado de http://www.mineduc.cl/usuarios/cpeip/File/nuevos%20estandares/ingles.pdf
Rahman F. A., Scaife, J., Yahya, N. A. y Jalil, H. A. (Julio, 2010). Knowledge of DiverseLearners: Implications for the Practice of Teaching [El conocimiento de distintos aprendices: Implicancias para la práctica de la enseñanza]. International Journal of Instruction, 3(2), 83-96. Recuperado de http://www.e-iji.net/dosyalar/iji_2010_2_5.pdf
Roberts, J. (1998). Language Teacher Education [La educación de profesor de Idiomas]. London: Arnold.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform Education [El conocimiento de la enseñanza: Bases de la Nueva Reforma Educativa]. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-23. Recuperado de http://dx.doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
University of Cambridge. (2013). Cambridge English Language Assessment: Exams [Exámenes de inglés de Cambridge]. Recuperado de http://www.cambridgeesol.org/exams/index.html
Vieytes, R. (2004). Metodología de investigación en organizaciones, mercado y sociedad: Epistemología y técnicas. Buenos Aires: Editorial de las Ciencias.
Xu, Q. (Febreor, 2009). Moving Beyond the Intermediate EFL learning Plateau [Más allá de la meseta de aprendizaje intermedio del inglés como lengua extranjera]. Asian Social Science, 5(2), 66-68. Recuperado de http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ass/article/viewFile/434/409
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
1. In case the submitted paper is accepted for publication, the author(s) FREELY, COSTLESS, EXCLUSIVELY AND FOR AN INDEFINITE TERM transfer copyrights and patrimonial rights to Universidad Nacional (UNA, Costa Rica). For more details check the Originality Statement and Copyright Transfer Agreement
2. REUTILIZATION RIGHTS: UNA authorizes authors to use, for any purpose (among them selfarchiving or autoarchiving) and to publish in the Internet in any electronic site, the paper´'s final version, both approved and published (post print), as long as it is done with a non commercial purpose, does not generate derivates without previous consentment and recognizes both publisher's name and authorship.
3. The submission and possible publication of the paper in the Educare Electronic Journal is ruled by the Journal’s editorial policies, the institutional rules of Universidad Nacional and the laws of the Republic of Costa Rica. Additionally, any possible difference of opinion or future dispute shall be settled in accordance with the mechanisms of Alternative Dispute Resolution and the Costa Rican Jurisdiction.
4. In all cases, it is understood that the opinions issued are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position and opinion of Educare, CIDE or Universidad Nacional, Costa Rica. It is also understood that, in the exercise of academic freedom, the authors have carried out a rogorous scientific-academic process of research, reflection and argumentation thar lays within the thematic scope of interest of the Journal.
5. The papers published by Educare Electronic Journal use a Creative Commons License:
The articles published by Educare Electronic Journal can be shared with a Creative Commons License: 
