Women’s Participation in the Information Systems Career at the National University of Costa Rica and Their Performance in Programming Courses
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.21-1.12Keywords:
Academic admission, higher education, women, engineering, computer programmingAbstract
It is well documented worldwide the low presence of women in informatics careers, and this phenomenon seems to have grown in recent years. This article describes the current situation in the Information Systems career in the School of Informatics at the National University of Costa Rica (UNA). The problem of low female participation is analyzed in two dimensions: recruitment and retention. To study recruitment, we have analyzed the institutional indices of application and admission. To study retention, we have analyzed student achievement in the programming area, because it is considered a central area in the curriculum and an area of difficulty for students. The analysis is performed using data obtained from the UNA Registration Department in a period of 8 years, from 2007 to 2014. The findings support the worldwide results about the underrepresentation of women in the career. Permanency patterns are similar for both sex, and women tend to be more effective in graduating. Additionally, the first two courses of programming seem to represent difficulties for all students, but women tend to have lower performance. In general, the study aims to be a starting point to propose educational actions to improve the rates of representation and permanence of women in the career, while increasing the number of graduates in the area; an issue that is of institutional, national and international interest.
References
Berenson, S. B., Slaten, K. M., Williams, L. y Ho, C.-W. (2012). Voices of women in a software engineering course: Reflections on collaboration. Journal on Educational Resources in Computing, 4(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/1060071.1060074
Beyer, S., Dekeuster, M., Walter, K., Colar, M. y Holcomb, C. (2005). Changes in CS students’ attitudes towards CS over time: An examination of gender differences. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 37(1), 392-396. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/1047124.1047475
Beyer, S., Rynes, K., Perrault, J., Hay, K. y Haller, S. (2003). Gender differences in computer science students. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 35(1), 49-53. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/792548.611930
Byrne, P. y Lyons, G. (2001). The effect of student attributes on success in programming. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 33(3), 49-52. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/507758.377467
Cohoon, J. (2002). Recruiting and retaining women in undergraduate computing majors. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 34(2), 48-52. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/543812.543829
Fisher, A., Margolis, J. y Miller, F. (1997). Undergraduate women in computer science: Experience, motivation and culture. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 29(1), 106-119 doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/268085.268127
Goold, A. y Rimmer, R. (2000). Factors affecting performance in first-year computing. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 32(2), 39-43. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/355354.355369
Hagan, D. y Markham, S. (2000). Does it help to have some programming experience before beginning a computing degree program? ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 32(3), 25-28. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/353519.343063
Katz, S., Allbritton, D., Aronis, J., Wilson, C. y Soffa, M. L. (2006). Gender, achievement, and persistence in an undergraduate computer science program. ACM SIGMIS Bulletin, 37(4), 42-57. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/1185335.1185344
Klawe, M. y Leveson, N. (1995). Women in computing: Where are we now? Communications of the ACM, 38(1), 29-35. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/204865.204874
Lamas, M. (Comp.). (1997). El género: La construcción cultural de la diferencia sexual. México, DF MX: Miguel Angel Porrúa. Grupo Editorial.
Lewis, S., Lang, C. y McKay, J. (2007). An inconvenient truth: The invisibility of women in ICT. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 15(1), 59-76. doi: https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v15i1.479
Margolis, J. y Fisher, A. (2003). Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Marín, G., Barrantes, E. G. y Chavarría, S. (2008). Are women becoming extinct in the Computer Science and Informatics Program? CLEI Electronic Journal, 11(2), 1-11. Recuperado de http://www.clei.org/cleiej/papers/v11i2p6.pdf
Mata, F. J., Matarrita, R. y Pinto, C. (2012). Assessing computer education in Costa Rica: Results of a supply and demand study of ICT human resources. CLEI Electronical Journal, 15(1), 1-18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/CLEI.2012.6427245
Mata, F. J., Quesada, A. y Raventós, G. M. (2012). Gender gap in computer science programs from Costa Rican Public universities. En Informatica (CLEI), 38 Conferencia Latinoamericana (pp. 1-7). http://doi.org/10.1109/CLEI.2012.6427245
McDowell, C., Werner, L., Bullock, H. E. y Fernald, J. (2003). The impact of pair programming on student performance, perception and persistence. En 25 International Conference on software engineering (pp. 602-607). USA: IEEE Computer Society. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/icse.2003.1201243
Miliszewska, I., Barker, G., Henderson, F. y Sztendur, E. (2006). The issue of gender equity in computer science--what students say. Journal of Information Technology Education, 5, 107-120.
Murphy, L., Richards, B., Mccauley, R., Morrison, B. B., Westbrook, S. y Fossum, T. (2006). Women catch up: Gender differences in learning programming concepts. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 38(1), 17-21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/1124706.1121350
Ramírez, W. M. y Rodríguez, I. (Octubre, 2013). ¿Por qué ingresan tan pocas mujeres a la carrera de Informática Empresarial del Recinto de Tacares de la Universidad de Costa Rica? Un enfoque de género. Ponencia presentada en la 39 Conferencia Latinoamericana de Informatica, Venezuela.
Rich, L., Perry, H. y Guzdial, M. (2004). A CS1 course designed to address interests of women. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 36(1), 190-194. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/1028174.971370
Sackrowitz, M. G. y Parelius, A. P. (1996). An unlevel playing field: Women in the introductory computer science courses. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 28(1), 37-41. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/236462.236488
Scragg, G. y Smith, J. (1998). A study of barriers to women in undergraduate computer science. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 30(1), 82-86. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/274790.273167
Stoilescu, D. y Egodawatte, G. (2010). Gender differences in the use of computers, programming, and peer interactions in computer science classrooms. Computer Science Education, 20(4), 283-300. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2010.527691
Ventura, P. y Ramamurthy, B. (2004). Wanted: CS1 students, no experience required. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 36(1), 240-244. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/1028174.971387
Vilner, T. y Zur, E. (2006). Once she makes it, she is there: Gender differences in computer science study. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 38(3), 227-231- doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/1140123.1140185
Wilson, B. C. (2002). A study of factors promoting success in computer science including gender differences. Computer Science Education, 12(1-2), 141-164. doi: https://doi.org/10.1076/csed.12.1.141.8211
Wilson, B. C. (2006). Gender differences in types of assignments preferred: Implications for computer science instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34(3), 245-255. doi: https://doi.org/10.2190/7FLU-VKJL-86RM-5RQG
Wilson, B. C. y Shrock, S. (2001). Contributing to success in an introductory computer science course: A study of twelve factors. En H. Walker, R. McCauley, J. Gersting e I. Russell (Chairmen), Proceedings of the 32nd SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 184-188). SIGCSE. New York: ACM. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/366413.364581
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
1. In case the submitted paper is accepted for publication, the author(s) FREELY, COSTLESS, EXCLUSIVELY AND FOR AN INDEFINITE TERM transfer copyrights and patrimonial rights to Universidad Nacional (UNA, Costa Rica). For more details check the Originality Statement and Copyright Transfer Agreement
2. REUTILIZATION RIGHTS: UNA authorizes authors to use, for any purpose (among them selfarchiving or autoarchiving) and to publish in the Internet in any electronic site, the paper´'s final version, both approved and published (post print), as long as it is done with a non commercial purpose, does not generate derivates without previous consentment and recognizes both publisher's name and authorship.
3. The submission and possible publication of the paper in the Educare Electronic Journal is ruled by the Journal’s editorial policies, the institutional rules of Universidad Nacional and the laws of the Republic of Costa Rica. Additionally, any possible difference of opinion or future dispute shall be settled in accordance with the mechanisms of Alternative Dispute Resolution and the Costa Rican Jurisdiction.
4. In all cases, it is understood that the opinions issued are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position and opinion of Educare, CIDE or Universidad Nacional, Costa Rica. It is also understood that, in the exercise of academic freedom, the authors have carried out a rogorous scientific-academic process of research, reflection and argumentation thar lays within the thematic scope of interest of the Journal.
5. The papers published by Educare Electronic Journal use a Creative Commons License:
The articles published by Educare Electronic Journal can be shared with a Creative Commons License: 
