Explorando as perspectivas, negociando contextos mediados por computadores, e interagindo com a tecnologia em espaços de aprendizagem de línguas e culturalmente diversificada
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.23-2.20Palavras-chave:
Ensino e aprendizagem de segunda língua, interação mediada por computador, salas de aula com tecnologia aprimoradaResumo
As tendências globais no século 21 destacam a importância e a necessidade de usar a tecnologia para permitir que os alunos demonstrem seus processos de aprendizagem, facilitando assim a aprendizagem de línguas em contextos tecnológicos significativos (Eaton, 2010). Este artigo procura abordar algumas questões relacionadas com a importância da tecnologia em relação à aprendizagem e ensino de segunda língua, incluindo benefícios, desafios, considerações e percepções de ensino com tecnologia. O objetivo deste artigo é baseado em três elementos. Primeiro, explora a tecnologia na educação, como tem sido comumente interpretado, desafiado e usado. Em segundo lugar, apresenta a tecnologia em idéias de educação para aprendizagem de segunda língua e discute alguns benefícios e desafios implícitos na interação de ambos. Por fim, e compartilha maneiras em que os autores, que atualmente trabalham em diversos contextos educacionais e implementaram alguns dos recursos gratuitos que forma colaborativa em um LiveBinder.
Referências
Arslana, R. Ş., & Şahin-Kızılb, A. (2010). How can the use of blog software facilitate the writing process of English language learners? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(3), 183-197. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2010.486575
Association of Latino Administrators and Superintendents. (2011). English language learners: Incorporating technology into the academic achievement strategy. Boston: Author. Retrieved from https://www.daleadershipinstitute.com/sites/daleadershipinstitute/files/2012-K-12-ELL_Incorporating-Technology-into-the-Academic-Achievement-Strategy.pdf
Ban, R., Jin, L., Summers, R., & Eisenhower, K. (2012). Integrating technology: Best-use practices for English language learners in content-based classrooms. Retrieved from http://www.appstate.edu/~jinl/esltech.pdfhttp://www.appstate.edu/~jinl/esltech.pdf
Billings, E., S., & Mathison, C. (2012). I get to use an iPod in school? Using technology-based advance organizers to support the academic success of English learners. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(4), 494-503. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9341-0
Brandt, D. (2001). Literacy in American lives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810237
Chandler-Olcott, K., & Mahar, D. (2003). “Tech-savviness” meets multiliteracies: Exploring adolescent girls’ technology-mediated-related literacy practices. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(3), 356-385. doi: https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.38.3.3
Conole, G. (2008). Listening to the learner voice: The ever changing landscape of technology use for language students. ReCALL, 20(2) 124-140. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344008000220
Davidson, C. (2009). Young children’s engagement with digital texts and literacies in the home: Pressing matters for the teaching of English in the early years of schooling. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 8(3), 36-54. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ869393.pdf
Davies, R. S. (2011). Understanding technology literacy: A framework for evaluating educational technology integration. TechTrends, 55(5), 45-52. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-011-0527-3
Eaton, S.E. (2010). Global trends in language learning in the 21st century. Calgary: Onate Press. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED510276.pdf
Evans, E. J. (2005). Autonomous literacy or social practice? Students’ constructions of technology literacy. Journal of Literacy and Technology, 5(1), 1-40.
Gee, J. P. (1991). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. London: Falmer Press.
Genishi, C., & Dyson, A.H. (2009). Children, language and literacy: Diverse learners in diverse times. New York: Teachers College Press.
Gray, R., & Stockwell, G. (1998). Using computer mediated communication for language and culture acquisition. On-Call, 12(3), 2-9.
Gronseth, S., Brush, T., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., Strycker, J., Abaci, S., Easterling, W., van Leusen, P. (2010). Equipping the next generation of teachers: Technology preparation and practice. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 27(1), 30-36. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2010.10784654
Harris, M. (2005). Contemporary ghost stories: Cyberspace in fiction for children and young adults. Children’s Literature in Education, 36(2), 111-128. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10583-005-3500-y
Hsieh, Y. (2017). A case study of the dynamics of scaffolding among ESL learners and online resources in collaborative learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(1-2), 115-132. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2016.1273245
International Society for Technology in Education. (2007). National educational technology standards for students (NETS-S). Retrieved from https://www.kelloggllc.com/tpc/nets.pdf
Knobel, M. (1999). Everyday literacies: Students, discourse, and social practice. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
Kozma, R., B & Anderson, R. E. (2002). Qualitative case studies of innovative pedagogical practices using ICT. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(4), 387-394. doi: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0266-4909.2002.00250.doc.x
Lam, W. S. E. (2009). Multiliteracies on instant messaging in negotiating local, translocal, and transnational affiliations: A case of an adolescent immigrant. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(4), 377-397. doi: https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.44.4.5
Leloup, J. W & Ponterio, R. (2003). Second language acquisition and technology: A review of the research. Washington, DC: Center of Applied Linguistics. Recuperado de https://ensinodelinguascomtic.files.wordpress.com/2010/03/leloup_second_language_acquisition_and_technology_review_of_research.pdf
Levy, M. (2009). Technologies in use for second language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 93(1), 769-782. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00972.x
Liu, M., Moore, Z., Graham, L., & Lee, S. (2002). A look at the research on computer-based technology use in second language learning: A review of the literature from 1990-2000. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(3), 250-273. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2002.10782348
Luke, A., & Elkins, J. (2000). Re/mediating adolescent literacies. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 43(5), 396-398.
Mayall, H. J., & Robinson, R. S. (2009). Investigating visual literacy integration: Lida’s legacy? Tech Trends, 53(2), 48-49. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-009-0268-8
Mims, C., Polly, D., Shepherd, C., & Inan, F. (2006). Examining PT3 projects designed to improve preservice education. Tech Trends, 50(3), 16-24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-006-7599-5
National Council of Teachers of English. (2008). The definition of 21st century literacies. Retrieved from http://www.ncte.org/governance/literacies?source=gshttp://www.ncte.org/governance/literacies?source=gs
National Geographic. (2012, September 6). Costa Rica: A little piece of paradise [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qTnTlECDO6w
Partnership of 21st Century Skills. (2007). In Framework for 21st century learning: Information and communication literacy. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/documents/P21_Framework_Definitions.pdfhttp://www.p21.org/documents/P21_Framework_Definitions.pdf
Salaberry, M. R. (1996). A theoretical foundation for the development of pedagogical tasks in computer mediated communication. Calico Journal, 14(1), 5-34.
Shaffer, D. W., Squire, K. R., Halverson, R., & Gee, J. P. (2005). Video games and the future of learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(2), 105-111. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170508700205
Stepp-Greany, J. (2002). Student perceptions on language learning in a technological environment: Implications for the new millennium. Language Learning & Technology, 6(1), 165-180. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.563.810&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Tobin, J. (2000). “Good guys don’t wear hats”: Children’s talk about the media. London: Teachers College Press.
U.S. Department of Education. (2010). National Education Technology Plan 2010. Retrieved from https://tech.ed.gov/
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Warschauer, M., & Meskill, C. (2000). Technology and second language learning. In J. W. Rosenthal (Ed.), Handbook of undergraduate second language education (pp. 303-318). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Wehrli, B. (2009). Technology as a Fence and a Bridge. Horace, (25)1, 1-4. Recuperado de https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ859274.pdf
Winke, P., Goertler, S., & Amuzie, G. L. (2010). Commonly taught and less commonly taught language learners: Are they equally prepared for CALL and online language learning? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(3), 199-219. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2010.486576
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
- Caso o artigo seja aceito para publicação, os autores permitem a cessão GRATUITA, EXCLUSIVA E INDEFINITA de seus direitos patrimoniais à Universidade Nacional (UNA, Costa Rica). Para obter mais detalhes, consultar a Carta de originalidade e cessão de direitos.
- Direitos de reutilização: a UNA concede aos AUTORS(AS) o direito de reutilizar para qualquer propósito, incluindo o auto arquivo, e a publicação na Internet ou em qualquer website da versão final aprovada e publicada (post print) do artigo, desde que seja feita para fins não lucrativos, não gere trabalho derivado sem autorização prévia e respeite as fontes de autoria.
- A oferta e possível publicação do artigo na Revista Electrónica Educare reger-se-á pelas suas políticas editoriais, pela regulamentação institucional da Universidade Nacional e pela legislação da República da Costa Rica. Além disso, quaisquer divergências futuras de opinião ou disputa serão resolvidas de acordo com os mecanismos de Resolução Alternativa de conflitos e a Jurisdição da Costa Rica.
- Em todos os casos, entende-se que as opiniões emitidas são de responsabilidade dos autores e não refletem necessariamente a posição e a opinião da Educare, CIDE ou da Universidade Nacional, Costa Rica. Entende-se também que, no exercício da liberdade acadêmica, os autores realizaram um rigoroso processo científico-acadêmico de pesquisa, reflexão e argumentação e que se enquadra na área temática de interesse da Revista.
- Os artigos publicados pela Revista Eletrônica Educare utilizam a Licença Creative Commons: