Estratégias de Avaliação Mediadas por TIC: Uma revisão da literatura
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.25-2.16Palavras-chave:
Avaliação educacional, tecnologia da informação, tecnologia educacional, revisão de literaturaResumo
O objetivo deste artigo é revelar as estratégias de avaliação mediadas pelas Tecnologias da informação e comunicação (TIC), de acordo com uma revisão sistemática da literatura configurativa e agregativa, valendo-se da teoria fundamentada para a análise dos dados. Para o caso particular, foram consideradas as estratégias, usos, tipos de avaliação e ferramentas utilizadas nos últimos anos (2010-2016) para mediar ou apoiar os processos de avaliação. Como evidência principal, é de conhecimento que o uso das TIC nos processos de avaliação ganhou força gradualmente e sua integração tem várias mudanças. Conclui-se que é necessário levar em consideração a estratégia, o tipo de avaliação a ser favorecida, as TIC ou a tecnologia disponível e o ambiente de aprendizagem em que o processo educacional é desenvolvido.
Referências
Amasha, M. yAlkhalaf, S. (2015). The effect of using facebook markup language (FBML) for designing an E-Learning Model in hgher education. International Journal of Research in Computer Science, 4(5), 1-9.
Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Barry, S. (2012). A video recording and viewing protocol for student group presentations: Assisting self-assessment through a Wiki environment. Computers & Education, 59(3), 855-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.008
Belland, B. R., Walker, A. E., Olsen, M. W. y Leary, H. (2015). A pilot meta-analysis of computer-based scaffolding in STEM education a pilot meta-analysis of computer-based scaffolding in STEM Education. International Forum of Educational Technology & Society, 18(1), 183-97.
Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R. F. y Tamim, R. M. (2014). An exploration of bias in meta-analysis: The case of technology integration research in higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(3), 183-209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-014-9084-z
Bordas Alsina, M. I. y Cabrera Rodríguez, F. Á. (2001). Estrategias de evaluación de los aprendizajes centrados en el proceso. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 59(218), 25-48. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23765840?seq=1
Buente, W., Winter, J. S., Kramer, H., Dalisay, F., Hill, Y. Z. y Buskirk, P. A. (2015). Program-Based Assessment of Capstone ePortfolios for a Communication BA Curriculum. International Journal of ePortfolio, 5(2), 169-179. http://theijep.com/pdf/IJEP191.pdf
Chapelle, C. A. y Voss, E. (2016). 20 years of technology and language assessment in Language Learning & Technology. Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 116-128. https://www.lltjournal.org/item/2950
Cheng, I. N. Y., Chan, J. K. Y., Kong, S. S. Y. y Leung, K. M. Y. (2016). Effectiveness and obstacle of using Facebook as a tool to facilitate student-centred learning in higher education. In Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 17(2), 2-10. https://www.eduhk.hk/apfslt/
Cohen, J. (1968). Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychological bulletin, 70(4), 213-220. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0026256
Cusi, A., Morselli, F. y Sabena, C. (2013). The use of technology in formative assessment to raise achievement. FaSMEd. Position paper. https://research.ncl.ac.uk/fasmed/positionpapers/The+use+of+technology+in+FA+to+raise+achievement_Revision+UNITO-FINAL.pdf
Dochy, F., Segers, M. y Dierick, S. (2002). Nuevas vías de aprendizaje y enseñanza y sus consecuencias: Una nueva era de evaluación. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 2(2), 13-28. https://redined.mecd.gob.es/xmlui/handle/11162/91274?locale-attribute=gl
Esteve Mon, F. M. y Gisbert Cervera, M. (2011). El nuevo paradigma de aprendizaje y nuevas tecnologías. REDU. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 9(3), 55-73. https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2011.6149
Ferenchick, G. S., Solomon, D., Foreback, J., Towfiq, B., Kavanaugh, K., Warbasse, L., Addison, J, Chames, F, Dandan, A. y Mohmand, A. (2013). Mobile technology for the facilitation of direct observation and assessment of student performance. Teaching and learning in medicine, 25(4), 292-299. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2013.827972
Fink, A. (2013). Conducting research literature reviews: From the internet to paper. SAGE. https://books.google.com.co/books?id=Dg5zAwAAQBAJ
García Laborda, J., Sampson, D. G., Hambleton, R. K. y Guzman, E. (2015). Guest editorial: Technology supported assessment in formal and informal learning. Educational Technology & Society, 18(2), 1-2. https://www.j-ets.net/collection/published-issues/18_2
García-Valcárcel-Muñoz-Repiso, A., Basilotta-Gómez-Pablos, V. y López-García, C. (2014). Las TIC en el aprendizaje colaborativo en el aula de primaria y secundaria. Comunicar, 21(42), 65-74. https://doi.org/10.3916/C42-2014-06
Gautreau, C. (2011). Motivational factors affecting the integration of a learning management system by faculty. Journal of Educators Online, 8(1), 1-23. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ917870
Gómez-Escalonilla, M., Santín M. y Mathieu, G. (2011). La educación universitaria on-line en el periodismo desde la vision del estudiante. Comunicar, 19(37), 73-80. https://doi.org/10.3916/C37-2011-02-07
Gough, D., Thomas, J. y Oliver, S. (2012). Clarifying differences between review designs and methods. Systematic reviews, 1(28), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-1-28
Hersh, M. (2014). Evaluation Framework for ICT-based learning technologies for disabled people. Computers & Education, 78, 30-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.05.001
Hu, C. (2016). Application of e-learning assessment based on AHP-BP algorithm in the cloud computing teaching platform. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 11(08), 27-32. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v11i08.6039
Izquierdo, B. (2008). De la evaluación clásica a la evaluación pluralista: Criterios para clasificar los distintos tipos de evaluación. Empiria: Revista de Metodología de Ciencias Sociales, 16, 115-134. https://doi.org/10.5944/empiria.16.2008.1392
Jagodziński, P. y Wolski, R. (2015). Assessment of application technology of natural user interfaces in the creation of a virtual chemical laboratory. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(1), 16-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9517-5
Kim, M. K., Zouaq, A. y Kim, S. M. (2016). Automatic detection of expert models: The exploration of expert modeling methods applicable to technology-based assessment and instruction. Computers & Education, 101, 55-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.007
Maas, N. A. y Flood, L. S. (2011). Implementing high-fidelity simulation in practical nursing education. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 7(6), e229-e235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2010.04.001
Martín Gámez, C., Ruiz Mora, A. B. y Ruiz-Mora, I. (2015). El blog para la adquisición de competencias profesionales en la enseñanza superior. Revista Opcion, 31(Especial 2), 730-752. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=31045568040
Mathrani, A., Christian, S. y Ponder-Sutton, A. (2016). PlayIT: Game based learning approach for teaching programming concepts. Educational Technology & Society, 19(2), 5-17. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Z8tpXBV1hFX25QSpfG5Ih1Ia9LVFlrsh/view
Muñoz, J. M. (2008). NNTT, TIC, NTIC, TAC... en educación ¿pero esto qué es? Quaderns digitals: Revista de Nuevas Tecnologías y Sociedad, 51, 43-60. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/ejemplar/186213
Navazesh, M., Rich, S. K. y Tiber, A. (2014). The rationale for and implementation of learner-centered education: Experiences at the Ostrow School of Dentistry of the University of Southern California. Journal of Dental Education, 78(2), 165-180.
Pásztor, A., Molnár, G. y Csapó, B. (2015). Technology-based assessment of creativity in educational context: The case of divergent thinking and its relation to mathematical achievement. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 18, 32-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2015.05.004
Pirnay-Dummer, P., Ifenthaler, D. y Spector, J. M. (2010). Highly integrated model assessment technology and tools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(1), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-009-9119-8
Ried, L. D. (2010). A distance education course in statistics. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 74(9), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.5688/aj7409172
Ritchie, S. M. (2016). Self-assessment of video-recorded presentations: Does it improve skills? Active Learning in Higher Education, 17(3), 207-221. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787416654807
Rust, C. (2002). The impact of assessment on student learning: How can the research literature practically help to inform the development of departmental assessment strategies and learner-centred assessment practices? Active Learning in Higher Education, 3(2), 145-158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787402003002004
Ryan, B. J. (2013). Line up, line up: Using technology to align and enhance peer learning and assessment in a student centred foundation organic chemistry module. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(3), 229-238. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RP20178C
Said, H., Kirgis, L., Verkamp, B. y Johnson, L. J. (2015). On-line vs. face-to-face delivery of information technology courses: Students’ assessment. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 14, 297-312. https://doi.org/10.28945/2274
San Martín Cantero, D. (2014). Teoría fundamentada y Atlas. ti: Recursos metodológicos para la investigación educativa. Revista electrónica de investigación educativa, 16(1), 104-122. https://redie.uabc.mx/redie/article/view/727/906
Sánchez Vera, M. del M., Prendes Espinosa, M. P. y Fernández Breis, J. T. (2013). Tecnologías semánticas para la evaluación en red: Análisis de una experiencia con la herramienta OeLE. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 31(2), 447-464. https://doi.org/10.6018/rie.31.2.116721
Shih, R.-C. (2011). Can Web 2.0 technology assist college students in learning English writing? Integrating Facebook and peer assessment with blended learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(5), 829-845. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.934
Singh, L. (2013). Guided assessment or open discourse: A comparative analysis of students interaction on Facebook Groups. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 14(1), 35-43. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tojde/issue/16895
Strauss, A. y Corbin, J. (2002). Bases de la investigación cualitativa. Técnicas y procedimientos para desarrollar la teoría fundamentada. Editorial Universidad de Antioquia.
Summak, M. S., Samancioğlu, M. y Bağlibel, M. (2010). Technology integration and assesment in educational settings. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 1725-1729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.973
van der Kleij, F. M., Eggen, T. J. H. M., Timmers, C. F. y Veldkamp, B. P (2012). Effects of feedback in a computer-based assessment for learning. Computers & Education, 58(1), 263-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.020
van Niekerk, E., Ankiewicz, P. y de Swardt, E. (2010). A process-based assessment framework for technology education: A case study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20(2), 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-008-9070-8
van Rooij, S. W. (2010). Higher Education and FOSS for e-Learning: The Role of Organizational Sub-cultures in Enterprise-wide Adoption. International Journal of Open Source Software and Processes (IJOSSP), 2(1), 15-31. https://doi.org/10.4018/jossp.2010010102
Wakimoto, D. K. y Lewis, R. E. (2014). Graduate student perceptions of eportfolios: Uses for reflection, development, and assessment. The Internet and Higher Education, 21, 53-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.01.002
Wang, S. (2014). The college physical education teaching evaluation based on the Fuzzy AHP-Entropy and the computer simulation. International Journal of Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering, 9(10), 45-56. https://doi.org/10.14257/ijmue.2014.9.10.05
Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001
Williams, K., Wryobeck, J., Edinger, W., McGrady, A., Fors, U. y Zary, N. (2011). Assessment of competencies by use of virtual patient technology. Academic Psychiatry, 35(5), 328-330. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.35.5.328
Wilson, M., Gochyyev, P. y Scalise, K. (2016). Assessment of learning in digital interactive social networks: A learning analytics approach. Online Learning, 20(2), 97-119. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v20i2.799
Wu, J. (2011). Improving the writing of research papers: IMRAD and beyond. Landscape Ecology, 26(10), 1345-1349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-011-9674-3
Yuretich, R. F. y Kanner, L. C. (2015). Examining the effectiveness of team-based learning (TBL) in different classroom settings. Journal of Geoscience education, 63(2), 147-156. https://doi.org/10.5408/13-109.1
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
- Caso o artigo seja aceito para publicação, os autores permitem a cessão GRATUITA, EXCLUSIVA E INDEFINITA de seus direitos patrimoniais à Universidade Nacional (UNA, Costa Rica). Para obter mais detalhes, consultar a Carta de originalidade e cessão de direitos.
- Direitos de reutilização: a UNA concede aos AUTORS(AS) o direito de reutilizar para qualquer propósito, incluindo o auto arquivo, e a publicação na Internet ou em qualquer website da versão final aprovada e publicada (post print) do artigo, desde que seja feita para fins não lucrativos, não gere trabalho derivado sem autorização prévia e respeite as fontes de autoria.
- A oferta e possível publicação do artigo na Revista Electrónica Educare reger-se-á pelas suas políticas editoriais, pela regulamentação institucional da Universidade Nacional e pela legislação da República da Costa Rica. Além disso, quaisquer divergências futuras de opinião ou disputa serão resolvidas de acordo com os mecanismos de Resolução Alternativa de conflitos e a Jurisdição da Costa Rica.
- Em todos os casos, entende-se que as opiniões emitidas são de responsabilidade dos autores e não refletem necessariamente a posição e a opinião da Educare, CIDE ou da Universidade Nacional, Costa Rica. Entende-se também que, no exercício da liberdade acadêmica, os autores realizaram um rigoroso processo científico-acadêmico de pesquisa, reflexão e argumentação e que se enquadra na área temática de interesse da Revista.
- Os artigos publicados pela Revista Eletrônica Educare utilizam a Licença Creative Commons:
The articles published by Educare Electronic Journal can be shared with a Licença Creative Commons : 
