Typology of Ordinary Wastewater Treatment Technologies Installed in Costa Rica
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15359/rca.53-2.5Keywords:
sewage treatment plants; sanitation infrastructure; sustainability; appropriate technologiesAbstract
This paper presents a profile of municipal wastewater treatment plants in Costa Rica, comparing it with those of other Latin American and Caribbean countries. By collecting data from 47 plants operated by public entities, complemented by the analysis of a sample of 382 projects which had requested construction permits between 2011 and 2016, it was possible to characterize wastewater treatment in Costa Rica in terms of capacity and technology trends. Results show that more than 90% of the plants operated by public entities can be considered as small, with 70% designed for flows of less than 5.0 L/s. With regard to the projects which had requested construction permits, more than 90 % of the plants were designed for flows of less than 5.0 L/s, and 84% were systems for private condominium projects. Use of activated sludge in treatment technology was found in 57% of the systems operated by public entities and in 98% the projects which had requested construction permits. Costa Rica has a higher proportion of small capacity plants (Q < 25 L/s) and uses activated sludge more frequently than the other Latin American and Caribbean countries that were analyzed in this study. These two conditions can result in higher operating costs, and it is recommended to review this practice in order to promote universal and more sustainable sanitation.
References
Agostini, M. D. L. Á., Monterubbianesi, M. G., Studdert, G., y Maurette, S. (2014). Un método simple y práctico para la determinación de densidad aparente. Recuperado de http://www.scielo.org.ar/pdf/cds/v32n2/v32n2a03.pdf
Balbuena, R. H., Terminiello, A. M., Claverie, J. A., Casado, J. P., y Marlats, R. (2000). Compactación del suelo durante la cosecha forestal. Evolución de las propriedades físicas. R. Bras.Eng. Agric. Amb, 4, 453-459. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1415-43662000000300023.
FAO. (1998). Agroforestería para la producción animal en Latinoamérica: Conferencia electrónica.Recuperado de http://www.fao.org/ag/AGa/AGAP/FRG/AGROFOR1/Siavosh6.Htm
Gómez Rodríguez, K. (2011). Incidencia de la compactación ocasionada por el tractor en las propiedades físicas en un andisol (Doctoral dissertation, Universidad Nacional de Colombia).Recuperado de http://www.bdigital.unal.edu.co/6417/
González Cueto, O., Iglesias Coronel, C. E., y Herrera Suárez, M. (2009). Análisis de los factores que provocan compactación del suelo agrícola. Revista Ciencias Técnicas Agropecuarias, 18(2). Recuperado de http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=93215937011
Instituto Meteorológico Nacional (IMN). (2017). Datos climáticos para la provincia de Limón, Costa Rica. Recuperado de https://www.imn.ac.cr/web/imn/inicio
Kobayashi, S. (1994). Effects of harvesting impacts and rehabilitation of tropical rain forest. Journal of Plant Research, 107(1), 99-106. Recuperado de http://www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/Books/Part1-Rehabilitation.pdf
Labelle, E. R., y Jaeger, D. (2011). Soil compaction caused by cut-to-length forest operations and possible short-term natural rehabilitation of soil density. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 75(6), 2314-2329. Recuperado de: https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications
Laureda, D. A., Botta, G. F., Tolón Becerra, A., y Rosatto, H. G. (2016). Compactación del suelo inducida por la maquinaria en campos de polo en Argentina. Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, 48(1), 79-99. Recuperado de http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1853-86652016000100007
Medina, C. (2016). Efectos de la compactación de suelos por el pisoteo de animales, en la productividad de los suelos. Remediaciones. Rev. Colombiana Ciencia Animal, 8(1), 88-93.Recuperado de https://revistas.unisucre.edu.co/index.php/recia/article/view/229/270
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.