Are the criteria of Welfare Economics satisfactory?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15359/eys29-66.1

Keywords:

Economics, economic policy, economic theory, microeconomics, heterodox economics

Abstract

Historically, economics was articulate in a dual manner, as science and practice, the separation between scientific and normative aspects is recent. Even so, it is necessary to make the transition between the two levels of analysis to offer solutions to real problems, leaving the issue of how to do it. Faced with this, welfare economics arises, as an appendix to neoclassical theory, providing a criterion with objectivity pretensions to judge and compare policy choices and social arrangements. The objective of this paper is to unify the theory of welfare economics, its decision criteria, and critics. To do this a profound theoretical and critical revision is carried out, regarding welfare economics and general equilibrium theory. The second part of the paper explains the ideas underlying the theory of welfare economics, showing how the transition between efficiency and optimality is made, to separate the positive and normative aspects of the analysis. In the third part, critical revisions to the criterion of welfare economics are presented, pointing out objections to its theoretical assumptions, claims of objectivity, descriptive reality, and narrowness. Concluding that, despite its limitations, the criterion should not be discarded, especially in a society that organizes a great part of its economic activity through the market as the main economic institution; but it isn’t adequate as a unique final criterion either.

References

Altman, M. (2021). Methodological challenges in Behavioral Economics: Towards a more holistic and empirically rooted economic science. Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy 5(3), 19-33. Disponible en: https://sabeconomics.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/JBEP-5-S3-2.pdf

Brue, S. y Grant, R. (2008). Historia del pensamiento económico. México: CENAGE Learning.

Cadwell, B. (1994). Beyond positivism: Economic Methodology in the Twentieth Century. London, United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis Group.

Cuadrado, J. R. et al. (2001). Política Económica: Objetivos e instrumentos. Madrid: McGraw-Hill Interamericana.

Dussel, E. (2009). Ética de la liberación en la edad de la globalización y la exclusión. Madrid, España: Editorial Trotta, S.A.

Ekelund, R. y Hébert, F. (2006). Historia de la teoría económica y su método. México D.F: McGraw-Hill Interamericana Editores S.A.

Fernández A., Parejo J., Rodríguez L. (2006). Política Económica. Madrid, España: McGraw Hill

Gravelle, H, y Rees, R. (2006). Microeconomía. Madrid, España: PEARSON EDUCACIÓN, S. A.

Gruber, J. (2016). Public finance and public policy. New York, US: Worth Publishers.

Herzog, S. (1950). Tres siglos de pensamiento económico. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Hinkelamert, F. (1970). Ideologías del desarrollo y dialéctica de la historia. Santiago, Chile: Nueva Universidad.

Kahneman, D. (2012). Pensar rápido, pensar despacio. Barcelona, España: Penguin Random House Grupo Editorial S.A.U.

Kreps, D. (1995). Curso de Teoría Microeconómica. Madrid, España: McGraw-Hill INTERAMERICANA de España, S.A.

Labandeira, X., León, C., Vázquez, M. (2007). Economía ambiental. Madrid, España: Pearson Educación, S.A.

Mora, R. (1-3 de diciembre, 2021). Una interpretación ecologista de la teoría rawlsiana de la justicia [Nuevas perspectivas teóricas y metodológicas sobre la socioeconomía]. V Reunión Iberoamericana de Socioeconomía. Madrid. https://sase.confex.com/sase/5im/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/18595

Muramatsu, R., y Barbieri, F. (2017). Behavioral economics and austrian economics: Lessons for policy and the prospects of nudges. Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy, 1(1), 73-78. Disponible en: https://www.sabeconomics.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/JBEP-1-1-11-F.pdf

Rodríguez, J. (2020). Herencia Institucional y desarrollo. Revista De Política Económica Y Desarrollo Sostenible, 6(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.15359/peds.6-1.3

Rodríguez, J. (2022). Medidas económicas del bienestar. Revista De Política Económica Y Desarrollo Sostenible, 7(2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.15359/peds.7-2.2

Sen, A. (1977). Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 6(4), 317-344. Disponible en: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2264946

Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc.

Sen, A. (2019). La idea de la justicia. Barcelona: Penguin Random House, Grupo Editorial S.A.U.

Varian, H. (2010). Microeconomía intermedia. Barcelona, España: Antoni Bosch, editor, S.A.

Published

07/04/2024

How to Cite

Are the criteria of Welfare Economics satisfactory?. (2024). Economía Y Sociedad, 29(66), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.15359/eys29-66.1

Issue

Section

Articles (Arbitrated section)

How to Cite

Are the criteria of Welfare Economics satisfactory?. (2024). Economía Y Sociedad, 29(66), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.15359/eys29-66.1

Comentarios (ver términos de uso)

Similar Articles

1-10 of 124

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>