Technlogical Affinity of University Faculty

Authors

  • Ana Teresa Morales Rodríguez Universidad Veracruzana, Mexico
  • Alberto Ramírez Martinell Universidad Veracruzana, Mexico

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15359/rep.9-2.5

Keywords:

technological affinity, perceptions, teachers, higher education, ICT

Abstract

Technological  affinity of faculty members of Higher Education (HE) is a determinant factor for  ICT integration in HE institutions. This paper presents a first approach to technological affinity of faculty members of computer science at “Universidad Veracruzana,” which is part of a project called Digital Divide into Universidad Veracruzana (UV), and we found common perceptions among the academic community -that we can understand as  a collective habitus, in terms of Bourdieu-. This habitus, in the case of faculty members of computer science is characterized by positive beliefs about the use of ICT in the academic functions such as research, teaching, management; perceptions about computer, laptop and Internet as key resources into their academic context; however, some perceptions of teachers fragment the habitus, as the lack of consideration on the use of mobile devices and other reservations about the use of ICT’s in the academic context.

Author Biographies

Ana Teresa Morales Rodríguez, Universidad Veracruzana

Estudiante de Doctorado en Investigación Educativa, Universidad Veracruzana; Maestría en Computación Aplicada, Laboratorio Nacional de Informática Avanzada.

Alberto Ramírez Martinell, Universidad Veracruzana

Profesor-Investigador del Instituto de Investigaciones en Educación de la Universidad Veracruzana; Doctor en Tecnología Educativa, versidad de Lancaster Inglaterra.

References

Alarcón E. y Ortiz V. (2013). Estudiantes, profesores y TIC: La investigación en México. En Ramírez- Martinell A. y Casillas A.M., Háblame de TIC: Tecnología Digital en la Educación Superior. 1a ed. Córdoba: Editorial Brujas.

Akbulut, Y., Odabasi, H., & Kuzu, A. (2011). Perceptions of preservice teachers regarding the integration of information and communication technologies in Turkish education faculties. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET, 10(3), 175-184.

Bourdieu, P. (1987). Los tres estados del capital cultural. Sociológica, UAM,11-17.

Castells, M. (2002). La era de la información: Economía sociedad y cultura. La sociedad red (Cuarta ed., Vol. I). Distrito Federal, México: Siglo XXI Editores.

Clark B. (1991). El Sistema de Educación Superior: Una visión comparativa de la organización académica. Editorial Nueva Imagen/Universidad.

Georgina, D. A., & Olson, M. R. (2008). Integration of technology in higher education: A review of faculty self-perceptions. Internet and Higher Education, 11(1), 1-8.

Georgina, D. A., & Hosford, C. C. (2009). Higher education faculty perceptions on technology integration and training. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 25(5), 690-696.

Gulbahar, Y., & Guven, I. (2008). A survey on ICT usage and the perceptions of social studies teachers in turkey. Educational Technology and Society, 11(3), 37-51.

Guevara, C. H. (2010). Integración tecnológica del profesor universitario desde la teoría social del Pierre Bourdieu. (U. d. Guadalajara, Ed.) Apertura Electrónica, (Número especial), 7.

Johnson, T., Wisniewski, M., Kuhlemeyer, G., Isaacs, G., & Krzykowski, J. (2012). Technology adoption in higher education: Overcoming anxiety through faculty bootcamp. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(2), 63-72.

Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Gago, D. Garcia, E., y Martín, S. (2013). NMC Perspectivas Tecnológicas: Educación Superior en América Latina 2013-2018. Un Análisis Regional del Informe Horizonte del NMC. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.

Kopcha, T. J. (2012). Teachers' perceptions of the barriers to technology integration and practices with technology under situated professional development. Computers and Education, 59(4), 1109-1121.

Ouzts, D. T., & Palombo, M. J. (2004). Technology in higher education: A study of perceptions of college professors. Tech trends: Linking Research and Practice to Improve Learning, 48(5), 19-24, 84.

PETIC-UV. (2012). Plan Estratégico de Tecnologías de Información y Comunicaciones, Dirección General de Tecnologías de Información. Recuperado el 15 de Abril, desde http://www.uv.mx/transparencia/files/2012/10/PlandeDesarrolloTecnologicoUV.pdf

Ramírez Martinell, A. (2012). Saberes digitales mínimos en Centros de Auto Acceso. Presentación Plenaria en el Encuentro Internacional de Centros de Auto Acceso. Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, Ver.

Ramírez M. A., Morales R.A., Olguín A. P. (2012). Marcos de Referencia de Saberes Digitales. En proceso de publicación, 1-26.

Trowler, P., Knight P. (2000) Departament-level Cultures and the Improvement of Learning and Teaching. Studies in Higher Education. Volume 25, No. 1, Carfax Publishing.

Universidad Veracruzana. (2012). Universidad Veracruzana. Recuperado de http://www.uv.mx/

Universidad Veracruzana (2014). Información Estadística, UV. Recuperado de http://www.uv.mx/informacion-estadistica/consultas-dinamicas/

Zare-ee, A. (2011).University teachers' views on the use of information communication technologies in teaching and research. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology- TOJET, 10(3), 318-327.

Downloads

Published

2014-12-08

How to Cite

Morales Rodríguez, A. T., & Ramírez Martinell, A. (2014). Technlogical Affinity of University Faculty. Ensayos Pedagógicos Journal, 9(2), 107-123. https://doi.org/10.15359/rep.9-2.5

Issue

Section

Academic Articles

How to Cite

Morales Rodríguez, A. T., & Ramírez Martinell, A. (2014). Technlogical Affinity of University Faculty. Ensayos Pedagógicos Journal, 9(2), 107-123. https://doi.org/10.15359/rep.9-2.5

Comentarios (ver términos de uso)