Theoretical reflections on mobility and sustainable urban planning applied to the Greater Metropolitan Area, Costa Rica
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15359/rgac.70-1.6Keywords:
urban mobility, sustainable urban planning, inter-modality, urban morphology, urban corridorAbstract
In Costa Rica and in particular in the Greater Metropolitan Area (GAM), most of the studies on the subject of inter-modality and transportation raise proposals related to the right to mobility and the implementation of inter-modality, however, they do not establish the feasibility to execute it. Also, the analysis of the theoretical issues and the approach under which they are oriented are left aside. This article proposes a series of theoretical reflections on important concepts and principles of urban mobility, based on the methodology of strategic city planning and under the sustainable urban planning approach. From the principles of continuity and connectivity that seek to promote the movement and displacement of people, goods and services, this article considered the approach of the concept of urban corridor as a strategy for mobility. It's included, a brief study of urban morphology and a circulation model (in a sector of the Greater Metropolitan Area). The results evidenced the GAM's limited capacity to promote interconnections between different places.
References
Álvarez, R. (2005). Análisis de prefactibilidad técnica de un sistema de transporte masivo en San José. CFIA.
Appleyard, D. (1981). Livable streets. Berkeley and Los Angeles. University of California Press.
Athukorala, P. y Narayanan, S. (2018). Economic corridors and regional development: The Malaysian experience. World Development. 1 (106), 1-14. ww.elsevier.com/locate/Worlddev.
Barrington-Leigh, C. y Millard-Ball, A. (2017). The world’s user-generated road map is more than 80% complete. PLoS One 12. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180698
Batty, M. (2003). Network geography: relations, interactions, scaling and spatial processes in GIS. In: Unwin DJ, Fisher P (eds) Representing GIS. Wiley. Chichester, pp 149–170.
Barron, C., Neis, P. y Zipf, A. (2014). A comprehensive framework for intrinsic OpenStreetMap quality analysis. Transaction in GIS. (18) 877–895. ttps://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12073
Barthelemy, M. (2011). Spatial networks. Physics Reports. (499) 1–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2010.11.002
Behrends, S. (2017). Burden or opportunity for modal shift? – Embracing the urban dimension of intermodal road-rail transport. Transport Policy. (59), 10-16. www.elsevier.com/%20locate/tranpol
Boeing, G. (2019). The morphology and circuity of walkable and drivable street networks. In: D’Acci L (ed) The mathematics of urban morphology. Birkhäuser, Basel. https://doi.org/ 10.2139/ssrn.3119939
Bravo, B. y Rivas, J. (2012). Elementos de cohesión urbana en escenarios metropolitanos: intersticios y corredores. IV Jornadas Internacionales sobre investigación en Arquitectura y Urbanismo. http://hdl.handle.net/10251/14949
Buhrgard, S. (2015). From expressways to boulevards: The compared conditions for boulevardisation in Stockholm and Helsinki. http://www.diva-portal.se/smash/get/diva2:822509/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Butler, J. (1986). Geografía económica: Aspectos espaciales y ecológicos de la actividad
Económica. Limusa.
Castells, M. (1998). La era de la información (3.a ed.). Alianza.
Carrión, F. (1 de julio, 2019). Seres Urbanos. Así son los corredores urbanos en América Latina. El País. España.
Constitución Política de la República de Costa Rica. (1949).
Curtis, C. (2006). Network City: Retrofitting the Perth metropolitan region to facilitate sustainable travel. Urban Policy and Research. 2 (24) 159-180.
Curtis, C. y Tiwari, R. (2008). Transitioning urban arterial roads to activity corridors. Urban Design International. 2 (3) 105-120.
Curtis, C., Ellder, E. y Scheurer, J. (2019). Public transport accessibility tools matter: A case study of Gothenburg, Sweden. Case Studies on Transport Policy. 1 (7) 96-107. www.elsevier.com/locate/cstp
Eppstein, D. y Goodrich, M. (2008). Studying (non-planar) road networks through an algorithmic Lens. In: Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGSPATIAL international conference on advances in geographic information systems, GIS ‘08. Presented at the SIGSPATIAL ‘08, Irvine, California, p 16. https://doi.org/10.1145/1463434.1463455
Harvey, D. (2007). Espacios del capital. Hacia una geografía crítica. Akal.
Hernández, H. y Jiménez, D. (2018). Movilidad peatonal y en bicicleta en Costa Rica. PEN y Lanamme-UCR.
Hesse, M. (2009). The City as a Terminal – the Urban Context of Logistics and Freight Transport. Ashgate.
Instituto Costarricense de Ferrocarriles. (2019). Informe de Estadísticas Operativas II Semestre 2018. INCOFER.
Jacobs, A. (1995). Great streets. MIT Press, Cambridge.
Jiménez-Fontana, P. y Guzmán, M. (2020). Redes productivas en Costa Rica. Programa Estado de la Nación.
Lara, J. (2016). El corredor urbano Nuevo México-Tesistán en Zapopan, Jalisco: un nuevo rompecabezas inmobiliario. Transporte y Territorio, (15) 323-347.
Levinson, D. El-Geneidy, A. (2009). The minimum circuity frontier and the journey to work. Regional Science and Urban Economics. (39) 732–738. ttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2009.07.003
Macharis, C. y Bontekoning, Y. (2004). Opportunities for OR in intermodal freight transport research: a review. Eur. J. Oper. Res, (153), 400-416.
Masucci, A., Stanilov, K. y Batty, M. (2013). Limited urban growth: London’s Street network dynamics since the 18th century. Plos One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0069469
McCann, B. (2013). Completing our streets: The transition to safe and inclusive transportation networks. Island Press.
Miralles, G. (2002). Ciudad y transporte: el binomio imperfecto. Ariel.
Ministerio de Vivienda y Asentamientos Humanos [MIVAH]. (2014). Plan Nacional de Desarrollo Urbano para la Gran Área Metropolitana 2013- 2030. Ministerio de Vivienda y Asentamientos Humanos. https:// www.mivah.go.cr/Biblioteca_PlanGAM.shtml
Ministerio de Obras Públicas y Transporte. (2019). Repositorio del Sector Transporte e Infraestructura. Ministerio de Obras Públicas y Transporte. http://repositorio.mopt.go.cr:8080/xmlui/
Mohajeri, N., French, J. y Gudmundsson, A. (2013). Entropy measures of street-network dispersion: analysis of coastal cities in Brazil and Britain. Entropy (15) 3340–3360. https://doi.org/10.3390/e15093340
Mohajeri, N., French, JR. & Batty, M. (2013). Evolution and entropy in the organization of urban street patterns. Ann GIS 19:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475683.2012.758175
Mohajeri, N. & Gudmundsson, A. (2012). Entropies and scaling exponents of street and fracture networks. Entropy 14:800–833. https://doi.org/10.3390/e14040800
Mohajeri, N. & Gudmundsson, A. (2014). The evolution and complexity of urban street networks: urban street networks. Geogr Anal 46:345–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/gean.12061
Organización de las Naciones Unidas. (2016). Conferencia de las Naciones Unidas sobre la Vivienda y el Desarrollo Urbano
Rosales, J. (2006). Road diet handbook: Setting trends for livable streets. Parsons Brinckerhoff.
Organización de las Naciones Unidas. (2005 A). Carta Mundial por el Derecho a la Ciudad (2005). ONU-Hábitat. https://onuhabitat.org.mx/index.php/componentes-del-derecho-a-la-ciudad
Organización de las Naciones Unidas. (2005 B). Objetivos del Desarrollo Sostenible (2015). ONU-Hábitat. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/es/objetivos-de-desarrollo-sostenible
Parthasarathi, P., Hochmair, H. y Levinson, D. (2015). Street network structure and household activity spaces. Urban Studies. (52) 1090–1112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098014537956
Polèse, M. (1998). Economía urbana y regional: introducción a la relación entre el territorio y desarrollo. EULAC-GTZ-ACDI.
Porta, S., Crucitti, P. y Latora, V. (2006). The network analysis of urban streets: a primal approach. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. (33) 705–725. https://doi.org/10.1068/b32045
Pradilla, E. y Pino, R. (2004). Ciudad de México: de la centralidad a la red de corredores terciarios. Anuario de Espacios Urbanos.
Programa Estado de la Nación. (2018). Informe estado de la nación 2018. PENCONARE.
Programa Estado de la Nación. (2020). Informe estado de la nación 2020. PENCONARE.
Ricci, A. y Black, I. (2005). The social costs of intermodal freight transport. Res. Transp. Econ., (14), 245-285.
Sánchez, L. (2018). Diagnóstico sobre la situación del transporte y la movilidad en Costa Rica. Programa Estado de la Nación.
Salom, J. y Casado, J. (2007). Movilidad cotidiana y mercados locales de trabajo en la Comunidad Valenciana, 1991-2001. Boletín de la Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles. (44) 5-38.
Salom, J., Albertos, J., Delios, E. y Pitarch, M. (1997). Las áreas de mercado de trabajo local en la Comunidad Valenciana. Una propuesta de delimitación. Estudios Territoriales. Ciudad y Territorio. (112) 335-356.
Sujith, K. (2015). Access Controlled High Speed Corridor and Urban Development of Kerala. Procedia Technology. 1 (24), 1851-1857. www.sciencedirect.com
Tapia, M. (2018). La ciudad, para quién: desafíos de la movilidad a la planificación urbana. Revista Bibliográfica de Geografía y Ciencias Sociales. 23 (1250).
Vrenken, H., Macharis, C. y Wolters, P. (2005). Intermodal Transport in Europe. European Intermodal Association.
Yeh, A. y Li, X. (2001). Measuring and monitoring of urban sprawl in a rapidly growing region using entropy. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing (67) 83–90.
Zielstra, D., Hochmair, H. y Neis, P. (2013) Assessing the effect of data imports on the completeness of OpenStreetMap – a United States case study. Transaction in GIS. (17) 315–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12037
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Proposed policy for journals offering Open Access
Authors publishing their works in the Journal acknowledge and agree to the following terms:
a) Authors retain the copyrights to their works and guarantee the Journal the right to be the first to publish their works, under the Creative Commons License Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International, CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.es), which allows others to share works upon complying with the acknowledgment of authorship and mention of the Journal as the original publisher of the work.
b) Authors are permitted to separately establish additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the official edition of the work published in the Journal (for example, authors may desire to place the work in an institutional repository or incorporate it into a book that is to published elsewhere) so long they acknowledgment to recognize the Journal as the original publisher. The aforementioned additional agreements must respect the terms of the non-profit character and sharing philosophy of the original license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 International, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.es).
c) Authors are encouraged to archive the post-print or editor/PDF version in Open Access repositories.