COSTA RICAN ELECTORAL GEOGRAPHY: COUNTERFACTUAL ANALYSIS OF POSSIBLE EFFECTS OF ALTERNATIVE PROVINCIAL DIVISIONS ON LEGISLATIVE POLITICAL REPRESENTATION (2002-2022)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15359/rgac.74-1.8Keywords:
Electoral geography, Spatial reconfiguration, Counterfactual analysisAbstract
A fundamental theme of electoral geography is the study of changes in spatial access to the legislative power resulting from variations in electoral constituencies, which is rarely reflected upon in Costa Rica. Through counterfactual analysis, we seek to understand how access to Congress by political parties in Costa Rica between 2002-2022 could have manifested had there been nine provinces instead of the existing seven. The results show that this scenario would have led to an increase in the political power of the two major parties, lesser representation for those with intermediate support, and preservation of minority parties. Additionally, the weight of peripheral provinces in legislative elections would have increased particularly since 2018, to the detriment of central regions. The study prompts reflection that the creation of new electoral constituencies would lead to a reconsideration of the ways in which political parties would approach different areas of the country in pursuit of legislative seats.
References
Agüero, J. (2023). Procesos electorales presidenciales en el pasado reciente de Costa Rica (1982-2018): entre la historia y la política. Revista Derecho Electoral, (35), 171-201. https://doi.org/10.35242/RDE_2023_35_9
Bani, M; Aldabas, K. (2023). Electoral districts’ distribution in Jordan: Political geographical analysis. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 9(2), s.p. https://doi.org/10.1177/20578911231173599
Baños, M; Palacios, C. (2014). Evolución territorial de los distritos electorales federales uninominales, 1977-2010. Investigaciones geográficas, (84), 81-95. https://doi.org/10.14350/rig.34063
Brenes, L. (2007). Matemáticas electorales: distribución de escaños en elecciones diputadiles costarricenses del 2006 (análisis comparativo). Revista de derecho electoral, (3), 1-26. https://www.tse.go.cr/revista/art/3/brenes_villalobos.pdf
Brenes, L; González, D. (2017). ¿Cómo se elige la asamblea legislativa en Costa Rica?: diez conceptos y pasos. Instituto de Formación y Estudios en Democracia (IFED), Tribunal Supremo de Elecciones. Costa Rica. https://www.tse.go.cr/pdf/publicaciones/C%C3%B3mo%20se%20Elige.pdf
Constitución Política de la República de Costa Rica. (1949). Gobierno de Costa Rica.
Cottrill, J. (2012). The effects of non-legislative approaches to redistricting on competition in congressional elections. The Journal of the Northeastern Political Science Association, 44(1), 32-50. https://doi.org/10.1057/pol.2011.14
Crespin, M; Edwards, B. (2016). Redistricting and individual contributions to congressional candidates. Political Research Quarterly, 69(2), 220-232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912916634893
Daxecker, U. (2019). Unequal votes, unequal violence: Malapportionment and election violence in India. Journal of Peace Research, 57(1), 156-170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343319884985
Decreto ejecutivo 16068-PLAN. (1985). Reforma División Regional del Territorio de Costa Rica, para los efectos de investigación y planificación del desarrollo económico. 26 de marzo de 1985. Ministerio de Planificación Nacional y Política Económica.
Edwards, B; Crespin, M; Williamson, R; Palmer, M. (2017). Institutional control of redistricting and the Geography of representation. The Journal of Politics, 79(2), 722-726. https://doi.org/10.1086/690633
Eubank, N; Rodden, J. (2020). Who is my neighbor? The spatial efficiency of partisanship. Statistics and Public Policy, 7(1), 87-100. https://doi.org/10.1080/2330443X.2020.1806762
Fan, C; Li, W; Wolf, L; Myint, S. (2015). A spatiotemporal compactness pattern analysis of congressional districts to assess partisan gerrymandering: a case study with California and North Carolina. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 105(4), 736-753. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2015.1039109
Forest, B. (2017). Electoral geography: From mapping votes to representing power. Geography Compass, 12(1), s.p. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12352
Forgette, R; Platt, G. (2005). Redistricting principles and incumbency protection in the US Congress. Political Geography, 24(8), 934-951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2005.05.002
Fraga, B. (2016). Redistricting and the causal impact of race on voter turnout. The Journal of Politics, 78(1), 19-34. https://doi.org/10.1086/683601
Gamboa, J; Venegas, M; Hernández, V; Muñoz, C; Monge, C; Ruiz, M; Oviedo, N; Granados, C; Acuña, Y; Mendoza, J. (2013). Ley de Creación de la Provincia Brunca. Proyecto de ley 18758.
Gilbert, D; Lambert, D. (2010). Counterfactual geographies: worlds that might have been. Journal of Historical Geography, 36(3), 245-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhg.2009.12.002
Goedert, N. (2014). Gerrymandering or Geography? How democrats won the popular vote but lost congress in 2012. Research and Poltics, 1(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168014528683
Giugăl, A; Johnston, R; Chiru, M; Ciobanu, I; Gavriș, A. (2017). Gerrymandering and Malapportionment, Romanian Style: The 2008 Electoral System. East European Politics and Societies, 31(4), 683–703. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325417711222
Hiroi, T; Neiva, P. (2013). Malapportionment and geographical bases of electoral support in the brazilian senate. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 5(1), 127-150. https://doi.org/10.1177/1866802X1300500106
Johnston, R. (2015). Which map? Which government? Malapportionment and Gerrymandering, UK-style. Government and Opposition, 50(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2014.25
Kassara, K. (2016). Electoral Geography and Conflict: Examining the Redistricting through Violence in Kenya. Columbia University. USA. http://www.columbia.edu/~kk2432/elecgeog0316.pdf
Kennedy, S. (2017). Electoral integrity: how gerrymandering matters. Public Integrity, 19(3), 265-273. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2016.1225480
Kovács, Z; Vida, G. (2015). Geography of the new electoral system and changing voting patterns in Hungary. Acta Geobalcánica, 1(2), 55-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.18509/AGB.2015.06
La Nación. (5 de abril de 2004). Impulsan la creación de dos nuevas provincias. La Nación. https://www.nacion.com/el-pais/impulsan-creacion-de-dos-nuevas-provincias/S67MQQPSTBAXPLUZQDR4IHGWLI/story/#:~:text=El%20mapa%20de%20Costa%20Rica,y%20Asesor%C3%ADa%20Municipal%20(IFAM).&text=La%20otra%20provincia%20ser%C3%ADa%20la,Golfito%2C%20Coto%20Brus%20y%20Corredores
La Nación. (20 de junio de 2013). PAC impulsa ley para crear nueva provincia en la zona sur. La Nación. https://www.nacion.com/archivo/pac-impulsa-ley-para-crear-nueva-provincia-en-la-zona-sur/QITE27BGVNC6XGJFD34ZSNTDJE/story/
León, F; González, R; Solís, L; Valverde, C; Barrantes, M; Jiménez, J; Villanueva, L; Brenes, V; Morera, C; Álvarez, M. (1997). Creación de la provincia ocho, con el nombre de Térraba. Proyecto de ley 12996.
León, F; González, R; Solís, L; Valverde, C; Barrantes, M; Jiménez, J; Villanueva, L; Brenes, V; Morera, C; Álvarez, M. (1997). Creación de la provincia nueve, con el nombre de Arenal. Proyecto de ley 12997.
Mahoney, J; Barrenechea, R. (2017). The logic of counterfactual analysis in case-study explanation. The British Journal of Sociology, 70(1), 306-338. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12340
Martínez, G. (2010). Propuesta metodológica para la redistritación electoral en México: el caso de Michoacán. Journal of Latin American Geography, 9(1), 89-106. https://doi.org/10.1353/lag.0.0080
McGann, A; Smith, C; Latner, M; Keena, A. (2016). Gerrymandering in America: the house of representatives, the supreme court, and the future of popular sovereignity. Cambridge University Press. USA.
Mikuš, R; Gurňák, D. (2014). Electoral system of Slovakia - Perspective of Political Geography. Journal of the Geographical Institute Jovan Cvijic SASA, 64(1), 79-92. https://doi.org/10.2298/IJGI1401079M
Procuraduría General de la República de Costa Rica. (2014). OJ-083-2014. Opinión jurídica. http://www.pgrweb.go.cr/scij/Busqueda/Normativa/pronunciamiento/pro_ficha.aspx?param1=PRD¶m6=1&nDictamen=18491&strTipM=T
Riera, P; Lago, I. (2023). The strategic determinants of legislative malapportionment in new democracies. Electoral Studies, (81), s.p. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2022.102568
Rossiter, K; Wong, D; Delamater, P. (2018). Congressional Redistricting: Keeping Communities Together? The Professional Geographer, 70(4), 609-623. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2018.1443477
Ruley, J. (2017). One person, one vote: Gerrymandering and the independent commission, a global perspective. Indiana Law Journal, 92(2), 783-816. https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj/vol92/iss2/9/
Sala Constitucional de la Corte Suprema de Justicia de Costa Rica. (2013). SC-Sentencia N° 06118. Sentencia. https://nexuspj.poder-judicial.go.cr/document/sen-1-0007-644555
Salas, L. (26 de noviembre de 2012). Figueres plantea referendo para gobernabilidad democrática, que devuelva el poder a los ciudadanos. CRHoy. https://archivo.crhoy.com/figueres-busca-devolver-a-los-ciudadanos-el-poder-en-la-toma-de-decisiones/nacionales/
Sánchez, F. (2003). Cambio en la dinámica electoral en Costa Rica: un caso de desalineamiento. América Latina Hoy, 35, 115-146.
Seabrook, N. (2022). One person one vote: a surprising story of Gerrymandering in America. Pantheon Books. USA.
Shin, M. (2020). Electoral geography in the Twenty-First Century. En J. A. Agnew, V. Mamadou, & J. Sharp (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Political Geography (pp. 281-296). Wiley Blackwell.
Trelles, A; Altman, M; Magar, E; McDonald, M. (2016). Datos abiertos, transparencia y redistritación en México. Política y gobierno, 23(2), 331-364. http://www.politicaygobierno.cide.edu/index.php/pyg/article/view/825/619
Tribunal Supremo de Elecciones. (2022). Resolución 1555-E11-2022. Sitio web del Tribunal Supremo de Elecciones. https://www.tse.go.cr/juris/electorales/1555-E11-2022.html
Webster, G. (2013). Reflections on current criteria to evaluate redistricting plans. Political Geography, 31, 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2012.10.004
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Alejandro Cascante Campos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Proposed policy for journals offering Open Access
Authors publishing their works in the Journal acknowledge and agree to the following terms:
a) Authors retain the copyrights to their works and guarantee the Journal the right to be the first to publish their works, under the Creative Commons License Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International, CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.es), which allows others to share works upon complying with the acknowledgment of authorship and mention of the Journal as the original publisher of the work.
b) Authors are permitted to separately establish additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the official edition of the work published in the Journal (for example, authors may desire to place the work in an institutional repository or incorporate it into a book that is to published elsewhere) so long they acknowledgment to recognize the Journal as the original publisher. The aforementioned additional agreements must respect the terms of the non-profit character and sharing philosophy of the original license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 International, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.es).
c) Authors are encouraged to archive the post-print or editor/PDF version in Open Access repositories.
REVGEO is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.es
.svg_4.png){kind=logo}
_(1).png){kind=logo}
_(1)_(1)_(1)_1.png){kind=logo}
(2)(1)(1)(1).png){kind=logo}
