Redes de productores-consumidores como impulsores de la transición hacia la sostenibilidad en contextos rurales. Dos casos de Costa Rica
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15359/rgac.73-2.6Palabras clave:
Transición hacia la sostenibilidad, innovación, mentalidad y habilidades de emprendedurismo, desarrollo rural, construcción de comunidades sosteniblesResumen
Transiciones exitosas hacia la sostenibilidad son cruciales para hacer frente a las diversas crisis en curso. Considerando el patrimonio biocultural, las costumbres y tradiciones locales, así como el entorno natural y la estética del paisaje, los contextos rurales muestran un gran potencial para promover el desarrollo sostenible y el crecimiento. El desarrollo sostenible de estos espacios favorece no sólo al ámbito local, sino también al desarrollo nacional y supranacional al fortalecer el crecimiento económico sostenible, contribuye a reducir el desempleo y la pobreza, así como mejorar las condiciones de vida. En las discusiones sobre las transiciones hacia la sostenibilidad en contextos rurales, el emprendedurismo a escala local es constantemente considerado como un importante impulsor gracias a las actividades empresariales innovadoras que genera. Se ilustra dicho rol de los emprendimientos al comparar dos casos dentro del contexto rural costarricense, particularmente los cantones de Dota y Turrialba. Con este propósito, se ejemplifica cómo ambas regiones contribuyen al desarrollo rural sostenible basado en sus características geográficas, colectivas y de emprendimiento. Específicamente, se investiga el papel de la mentalidad y las habilidades específicas de los emprendedores, su inserción en redes productores-consumidores, así como la influencia del contexto geográfico. Se extraen implicaciones en los diferentes niveles de análisis en términos de oportunidades de aprendizaje tanto para las regiones consideradas, como para el desarrollo suprarregional en un sentido más amplio. Se presenta el proyecto sCoRe como una iniciativa ejemplar diseñada para fomentar la colaboración entre emprendedores rurales e iniciativas académicas para mejorar las redes locales de productores y consumidores y así contribuir al establecimiento de comunidades sostenibles.
Referencias
Aboelela, S. W., Larson, E., Bakken, S., Carrasquillo, O., Formicola, A., Glied, S. A., Haas, J. & Gebbie, K. M. (2007). Defining interdisciplinary research: Conclusions from a critical review of the literature. Health services research, 42(1), 329-346.
Alsos, G; Carter, S; Ljunggren, E. (2014). Kinship and business: how entrepreneurial households facilitate business growth. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 26(1-2), 97-122.
Aoyama, Y; Murphy, J; Hanson, S. (2011). Key Concepts in Economic Geography. London: Sage.
Avelar, S., Borges-Tiago, T., Almeida, A., & Tiago, F. (2024). Confluence of sustainable entrepreneurship, innovation, and digitalization in SMEs. Journal of Business Research, 170.
Avendaño, D; Elizondo, M; Méndez, S. (2022). Análisis espacial de tipologías de microemprendimiento económico con potencial turístico en el cantón de Dota, Costa Rica. Revista Geográfica de América Central, 68(1), 25-54.
Bamberg, S; Fischer, D; Geiger, S. (2021). The role of the individual in the great transformation toward sustainability. Frontiers in psychology, 12.
Banks, S; Shenton, F. (2001). Regenerating neighborhoods: a critical look at the role of community capacity building. Local Economy, 16(4), 286-298.
Beckley, T. M., Martz, D., Nadeau, S., Wall, E., & Reimer, B. (2008). Multiple capacities, multiple outcomes: Delving deeper into the meaning of community capacity. Journal of rural and community development, 3(3), 56-75.
Bergmann, M., Schäpke, N., Marg, O., Stelzer, F., Lang, D. J., Bossert, M., Gantert, M., Häußler, E., Marquardt, E., Piontek, F.
M., Potthast, T., Rhodius, R., Rudolph, M., Ruddat, M., Seebacher, A. & Sußmann, N. (2021). Transdisciplinary sustainability research in real-world labs: success factors and methods for change. Sustainability Science, 16, 541-564.
Blanco, M; Riveros, H. (2005). Las rutas alimentarias, herramienta para valorizar productos de las agroindustrias rurales. El caso de la ruta del queso Turrialba, Costa Rica. Perspectivas Rurales Nueva Época, (17-18), 85-97.
Busenitz, L. (1996). Research on entrepreneurial alertness. Journal of Small Business Management, 34(4), 35.
Candelo, E., Casalegno, C., Civera, C., & Büchi, G. (2019). A Ticket to Coffee: Stakeholder View and Theoretical Framework of Coffee Tourism Benefits. Tourism Analysis, 24(3), 329–340.
Caniglia, G., Luederitz, C., von Wirth, T., Fazey, I., Martín-López, B., Hondrila, K., König, A., von Wehrden, H., Schäpke, N.A.,
Laubichler, M. D. & Lang, D. J. (2021). A pluralistic and integrated approach to action-oriented knowledge for sustainability. Nature Sustainability, 4(2), 93-100.
Castree, N; Kitchin, R; Rogers, A. (2013). A Dictionary of Human Geography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Coenen, L; Truffer, B. (2012). Toward a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions. Research Policy, 41, 968-979.
Cui, J; Bell, R. (2022). Behavioural entrepreneurial mindset: How entrepreneurial education activity impacts entrepreneurial intention and behaviour. The International Journal of Management Education, 20(2).
Daspit, J; Fox, C; Findley, S. (2023). Entrepreneurial mindset: An integrated definition, a review of current insights, and directions for future research. Journal of Small Business Management, 61(1), 12-44.
Davis, M; Hall, J; Mayer, P. (2016). Developing a new measure of entrepreneurial mindset: Reliability, validity, and implications for practitioners. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 68(1), 21.
Doloreux, D; Dionne, S. (2008). Is regional innovation system development possible in peripheral regions? Some evidence from the case of La Pocatière, Canada. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 20, 259-283.
Douglas, E; Shepherd, D. (2000). Entrepreneurship as a utility maximizing response. Journal of business venturing, 15(3), 231-251.
Drover, W., Busenitz, L., Matusik, S., Townsend, D., Anglin, A., & Dushnitsky, G. (2017). A review and road map of entrepreneurial equity financing research: venture capital, corporate venture capital, angel investment, crowdfunding, and accelerators. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1820–1853.
Eissler, S. (2015). Understanding Diffusion of Innovations with Smallholder Coffee Farmers in Turrialba, Costa Rica. Master's thesis. Pennsylvania State University.
Fastenrath, S; Braun, B. (2018). Lost in Transition? Directions for an Economic Geography of Urban Sustainability Transitions. Sustainability, 10.
Fitjar, D; Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2011). Innovating in the Periphery: Firms, Values, and Innovation in Southwest Norway. European Planning Studies, 19(4), 555-574.
Gaglio, C; Katz, J. (2001). The psychological basis of opportunity identification: Entrepreneurial alertness. Small business economics, 16, 95-111.
Geels, F. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case study. Res. Policy, 31, 1257–1274.
Gyimah, P; Lussier, R. (2021). Rural entrepreneurship success factors: an empirical investigation in an emerging market. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 31(4), 5-19.
Hansen, T; Coenen, L. (2015). The geography of sustainability transitions: Review, synthesis, and reflections on an emergent research field. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 17, 92-109.
Hossain, M; Park, S; Shahid, S. (2023). Frugal innovation for sustainable rural development. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 193.
Hyman, J. (2002). Exploring social capital and civic engagement to create a framework for community building. Applied developmental science, 6(4), 196-202.
Jahn, S., Newig, J., Lang, D. J., Kahle, J., & Bergmann, M. (2022). Demarcating transdisciplinary research in sustainability science—Five clusters of research modes based on evidence from 59 research projects. Sustainable Development, 30(2), 343-357.
Kaish, S; Gilad, B. (1991). Characteristics of opportunities search of entrepreneurs versus executives: Sources, interests, general alertness. Journal of business venturing, 6(1), 45-61.
Kaufmann, R; Cleveland, C. (1995). Measuring sustainability: needed--an interdisciplinary approach to an interdisciplinary concept. Ecological Economics, 15(2), 109-112.
Kamara, Y. (2022). Culture and sustainable development: a still untapped potential. En UNESCO, Reshaping policies for creativity: addressing culture as a global public goal (pp. 209-236). Paris: UNESCO.
Kibler, E., Fink, M., Lang, R., & Muñoz, P. (2015). Place attachment and social legitimacy: Revisiting the sustainable entrepreneurship journey. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 3, 24-29.
Kirzner, I. (1979). Perception, opportunity, and profit. Chicago, IL, USA: Chicago University Press.
Knight, F. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit (Vol. 31). Houghton Mifflin.
Kny, J., Claus, R., Harris, J., & Schäfer, M. (2023). Assessing societal effects: Lessons from evaluation approaches in transdisciplinary research fields. GAIA-Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 32(1), 178-185.
Korsgaard, S; Tanvig, H. (2015). Rural entrepreneurship or Entrepreneurship in the Rural: Between place and space. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 21(1), 5-26.
Kratzer, A; Ammering, U. (2019). Rural innovations in biosphere reserves – A social network approach. Journal of Rural Studies, 71, 144-155.
Kuratko, D. (2017). Entrepreneurship: theory, process, practice. Boston: Cengage Learning.
Kuratko, D; Fisher, G; Audretsch, D. (2020). Unraveling the entrepreneurial mindset. Small Business Economics, 57, 1681-1691.
Lam, D. P., Freund, M. E., Kny, J., Marg, O., Mbah, M., Theiler, L., Bergmann, M, Brohmann, B., Lang, D.J. & Schäfer, M. (2021). Transdisciplinary research: towards an integrative perspective. GAIA-Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 30(4), 243-249.
Lang, D. J., Wiek, A., Bergmann, M., Stauffacher, M., Martens, P., Moll, P., Swilling, M. & Thomas, C. J. (2012). Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges. Sustainability science, 7, 25-43.
Larsen, I. (2022). Fostering an entrepreneurial mindset: A typology for aligning instructional strategies with three dominant entrepreneurial mindset conceptualizations. Industry and Higher Education, 36(3), 236-251.
Longhurst, N. (2015). Towards an ‘alternative’ geography of innovation: Alternative milieu, socio-cognitive protection, and sustainability experimentation. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 17, 183–198.
Loorbach, D; Frantzeskaki, N; Avelino, F. (2017). Sustainability Transitions Research: Transforming Science and Practice for Societal Change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 42, 599-626.
Lux, A., Schäfer, M., Bergmann, M., Jahn, T., Marg, O., Nagy, E., Ransiek, A-C. & Theiler, L. (2019). Societal effects of transdisciplinary sustainability research—How can they be strengthened during the research process? Environmental Science & Policy, 101, 183-191.
Lynch, M; Corbett, A. (2023). Entrepreneurial mindset shift and the role of cycles of learning. Journal of Small Business Management, 61(1), 80-101.
Manzo, L; Perkins, D. (2006). Finding common ground: The importance of place attachment to community participation and planning. Journal of planning literature, 20(4), 335-350.
Markarda, J; Raven, R; Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 41, 955-967.
Mayer, H; Baumgartner, D. (2014). The Role of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Peripheral Regions. disP - The Planning Review, 50(1), 16-23.
McGrath, R; MacMillan, I. (2000). The entrepreneurial mindset: Strategies for continuously creating opportunity in an age of uncertainty (Vol. 284). Harvard Business Press.
McKeever, E; Jack, S; Anderson, A. (2015). Embedded entrepreneurship in the creative re-construction of place. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(1), 50-65.
McMullen, J; Shepherd, D. (2006). Entrepreneurial action and the role of uncertainty in the theory of the entrepreneur. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 132–152.
Müller, S; Korsgaard, S. (2018). Resources and bridging: the role of spatial context in rural entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 30.
Naumann, C. (2017). Entrepreneurial mindset: A synthetic literature review. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 5(3), 149-172.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2006). The New Rural Paradigm: Policies and Governance. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Pereira, L., Karpouzoglou, T., Frantzeskaki, N., & Olsson, P. (2018). Designing transformative spaces for sustainability in social-ecological systems. Ecology & society, 23(4).
Pliakoura, A; Beligiannis, G; Kontogeorgos, A. (2020). Education in agricultural entrepreneurship: training needs and learning practices. Education+Training, 62(7/8), 723-739.
Ramos-Mejía, M; Jauregui-Becker, J. (2018). Sustainability transitions in the developing world: Challenges of sociotechnical transformations unfolding in contexts of poverty. Environmental Science and Policy, 84, 217–223.
Ray, D. (1993). Understanding the entrepreneur: entrepreneurial attributes, experience, and skills. Entrepreneurship & regional development, 5(4), 345-358.
Robinson, K; Robinson, D; Westley, F. (2012). Agency in Social Innovation: Putting the Model in the Model of the Agent. In
A. Nicholls, & A. Murdock, Social Innovation: Blurring Boundaries to Reconfigure Markets (pp. 162-177). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rodríguez-Pose, A; Crescenzi, R. (2008). Research and development, spillovers, innovation systems, and the genesis of regional growth in Europe. Regional Studies, 42(1), 51-67.
Sancho, F. (2010). Agricultural and rural entrepreneurship: concepts for modeling development. Comunica Magazine, 64-77.
Schumpeter, J; Nichol, A. (1934). Robinson's economics of imperfect competition. Journal of political economy, 42(2), 249-259.
Shane, S. (2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship: The individual-opportunity nexus. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Sherrard, D; Alvarado, I. (2017). Entrepreneurship education in agriculture: The EARTH University approach. African Journal of Rural Development, 2(2), 153-160.
Smith, A; Stirling, A; Berkhout, F. (2005). The governance of sustainable sociotechnical transitions. Research Policy, 34, 1491–1510.
Tödtling, F; Lengauer, L; Höglinger, C. (2011). Knowledge Sourcing and Innovation in “Thick” and “Thin” Regional Innovation Systems - Comparing ICT Firms in Two Austrian Regions. European Planning Studies, 19(7), 1245-1276.
Truffer, B; Murphy, J; Raven, R. (2015). The geography of sustainability transitions: Contours of an emerging theme. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 17, 63-72.
Villalobos, K., Sancho, P., Rubí, J., Granados, L., Avendaño, D. F. (2020). Inventario de oferta de bienes y servicios articulables para impulsar la estrategia OVOP-Dota, Costa Rica. Perspectivas Rurales, 18 (36), 23-50.
Wallis, H., Bamberg, S., Schulte, M., & Matthies, E. (2021). Empowering People to Act for a Better Life for All. European Psychologist, 26(3), 184–194.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Daniel Avendaño-Leadem, Lena Schmeiduch, Orlando Bruno Nuñez, Shirin Betzler
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Política propuesta para Revistas que ofrecen Acceso Abierto
Los autores que publican en esta revista están de acuerdo con los siguientes términos:
a. Los autores conservan los derechos de autor y garantizan a la revista el derecho de ser la primera publicación del trabajo, bajo la Licencia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.es, que permite a otros compartir con un reconocimiento de la autoría del trabajo y la publicación inicial en esta revista.
b. Los autores pueden establecer por separado acuerdos adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión de la obra publicada en la revista (por ejemplo, situarlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro), con un reconocimiento de su publicación inicial en esta revista. Esos acuerdos adicionales deben respetar los términos de la licencia: es decir: no involucrar fines de lucro y compartir con la misma licencia.
c. Se anima a los autores a archivar el post-print o versión de editor/PDF en repositorios de acceso abierto.
REVGEO se encuentra bajo la licencia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.es
.svg_4.png){kind=logo}
_(1).png){kind=logo}
_(1)_(1)_(1)_1.png){kind=logo}
(2)(1)(1)(1).png){kind=logo}
