Revisión literaria de valoración económica de soluciones basadas en naturaleza en agricultura
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15359/prne.22-44.6Palabras clave:
Recursos naturales, Evaluación Económica, Desarrollo Sostenible, Agricultura, Servicios EcosistémicosResumen
Las soluciones basadas en naturaleza (SbN) son un campo en auge, no obstante, hay carencia de información sobre la forma de abarcar su valoración económica en sistemas de producción agrícola. Este estudio realiza un análisis bibliográfico del concepto y evolución, así como sus diferentes campos de acción, se desarrolla un estado de la cuestión sobre la valoración económica de alternativas consideradas dentro del término de SbN, como proceso para resolver problemáticas en diversas actividades humanas, con enfoque en el campo agropecuario. Se demuestra que el término de SbN es relativamente nuevo, donde a partir del año 2015 aumentan la cantidad de publicaciones, en campos múltiples y correlacionados; donde, además, los enfoques de valoración económica son igualmente diversos según el tipo de solución, su escala o campo de aplicación. Se requiere ampliar el campo de estudio de la valoración económica de SbN orientado al sector agrícola, que considera alternativas viables para el desarrollo sostenible, procesos de conservación y mejoramiento de la productividad del sector agropecuario.
Referencias
Aerts, J. C. J. H. (2018). A review of cost estimates for flood adaptation. Water (Switzerland), 10(11), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10111646
Alcamo, J., Ash, N. J., Butler, C. D., Callicott, J. B., Capistrano, D., Carpenter, S. R., Castilla, J. C., Chambers, R., Chopra, K., Cropper, A., Daily, G. C., Dasgupta, P., de Groot, R., Dietz, T., Duraiappah, A. K., Gadgil, M., Hamilton, K., Bennett, E. M., Hassan, R., … Vessuri, H. (2005). Ecosistemas y Bienestar Humano: Marco para la Evaluación. 31.
Allsopp, M. H., de Lange, W. J., & Veldtman, R. (2008). Valuing Insect Pollination Services with Cost of Replacement. PLoS ONE, 3(9), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003128
Alvarez, S., Asci, S., & Vorotnikova, E. (2016). Valuing the Potential Benefits of Water Quality Improvements in Watersheds Affected by Non-Point Source Pollution. Water, 8(4), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/w8040112
Barbagli, A., Jensen, B. N., Raza, M., Schüth, C., & Rossetto, R. (2019). Assessment of soil buffer capacity on nutrients and pharmaceuticals in nature-based solution applications. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(1), 759–774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3515-8
Barton, D. N. (2002). The transferability of benefit transfer: Contingent valuation of water quality improvements in Costa Rica. Ecological Economics, 42(1–2), 147–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00044-7
Bergstrom, J. C., Dillman, B. L., & Stoll, J. R. (1985). Public Environmental Amenity Benefits of Private Land: The Case of Prime Agricultural Land. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 17(1), 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0081305200017155
Blackburn, J., Mooiweer, H., Parks, M., & Hutson, A. (2018). The Soil Value Exchange: Unlocking nature’s value via the market. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 74(3), 162–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2018.1461974
Boano, F., Caruso, A., Costamagna, E., Ridolfi, L., Fiore, S., Demichelis, F., Galvão, A., Pisoeiro, J., Rizzo, A., & Masi, F. (2020). A review of nature-based solutions for greywater treatment: Applications, hydraulic design, and environmental benefits. Science of the Total Environment, 711, 1-26 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134731
Bowker, J. M., & Didychuk, D. D. (1994). Estimation of the Nonmarket Benefits of Agricultural Land Retention in Eastern Canada. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 23(2), 218–225. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1068280500002331
Boyle, K. (2017). Contingent Valuation in Practice. In A primer on nonmarket valuation (Champ et al, pp. 187–233). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Brady, M. V., Hedlund, K., Cong, R.-G., Hemerik, L., Hotes, S., Machado, S., Mattsson, L., Schulz, E., & Thomsen, I. K. (2015). Valuing Supporting Soil Ecosystem Services in Agriculture: A Natural Capital Approach. Agronomy Journal, 107(5), 1809–1821. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj14.0597
Brander, L., Brouwer, R., & Wagtendonk, A. (2013). Economic valuation of regulating services provided by wetlands in agricultural landscapes: A meta-analysis. Ecological Engineering, 56, 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.12.104
Bridgewater, P. (2018). Whose nature? What solutions? Linking Ecohydrology to Nature-based solutions. Ecohydrology and Hydrobiology, 18(4), 311–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecohyd.2018.11.006
Brinkley, C. (2012). Evaluating the Benefits of Peri-Urban Agriculture. Journal of Planning Literature, 27(3), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412211435172
Brown, T. C., Bergstrom, J. C., & Loomis, J. B. (2007). Defining, Valuing, and Providing Ecosystem Goods and Services. Natural Resoruces Journal, 47, 49.
Calliari, E., Staccione, A., & Mysiak, J. (2019). An assessment framework for climate-proof nature-based solutions. Science of The Total Environment, 656, 691–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.341
Chardonnet, Ph., Des Clers, B., Fisher, J. R., Gerhold, R., Jori, F., & Lamarque, F. (2002). The value of wildlife. Revue Scientifique et Technique de l’OIE, 21(1), 15–51. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.21.1.1323
Chau, C. K., Tse, M. S., & Chung, K. Y. (2010). A choice experiment to estimate the effect of green experience on preferences and willingness-to-pay for green building attributes. Building and Environment, 45(11), 2553–2561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.05.017
Chen, W. Y. (2017). Environmental externalities of urban river pollution and restoration: A hedonic analysis in Guangzhou (China). Landscape and Urban Planning, 157, 170–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.06.010
Cho, S.-H., Poudyal, N. C., & Roberts, R. K. (2008). Spatial analysis of the amenity value of green open space. Ecological Economics, 66(2–3), 403–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.10.012
Chui, T. F. M., & Ngai, W. Y. (2016). Willingness to pay for sustainable drainage systems in a highly urbanised city: A contingent valuation study in Hong Kong: Willingness to pay for sustainable drainage systems in Hong Kong. Water and Environment Journal, 30(1–2), 62–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/wej.12159
Cohen-Shacham, E., Andrade, A., Dalton, J., Dudley, N., Jones, M., Kumar, C., Maginnis, S., Maynard, S., Nelson, C. R., Renaud, F. G., Welling, R., & Walters, G. (2019). Core principles for successfully implementing and upscaling Nature-based Solutions. Environmental Science and Policy, 98, 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.04.014
Cohen-Shacham, E., Walters, G., Janzen, C., & Maginnis, S. (Eds.). (2016). Nature-based solutions to address global societal challenges. IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2016.13.en
Corral, S., & Quintero, M. (2007). La Metodología Multicriterial y los Métodos de Valoración de Impactos Ambientales. Actualidad Contable FACES, 10.
Croci, E., Lucchitta, B., & Penati, T. (2021). Valuing ecosystem services at the urban level: A critical review. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031129
Czembrowski, P., & Kronenberg, J. (2016). Hedonic pricing and different urban green space types and sizes: Insights into the discussion on valuing ecosystem services. Landscape and Urban Planning, 146, 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.10.005
Davies, C., Chen, W. Y., Sanesi, G., & Lafortezza, R. (2021). The European Union roadmap for implementing nature-based solutions: A review. Environmental Science and Policy, 121, 49–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.03.018
De Groot, R. (2010). Integrating the ecological and economic dimensions in biodiversity and ecosystem service valuation. In The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity Ecological and Economic Foundations (The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB), pp. 1–40). Pushpam Kumar. http://teebweb.org/publications/teeb-for/research-and-academia/
Dhyani, S., Karki, M., & Petwal, A. (2018). Localizing SDGs in India using Nature based Solutions (NbS). Current Science, 115 ,(00113891), 1442–1443. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=132677672&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Dorst, H., van der Jagt, A., Raven, R., & Runhaar, H. (2019). Urban greening through nature-based solutions – Key characteristics of an emerging concept. Sustainable Cities and Society, 49, 101620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101620
Eggermont, H., Balian, E., Azevedo, J. M. N., Beumer, V., Brodin, T., Claudet, J., Fady, B., Grube, M., Keune, H., Lamarque, P., Reuter, K., Smith, M., van Ham, C., Weisser, W. W., & Le Roux, X. (2015). Nature-based Solutions: New Influence for Environmental Management and Research in Europe. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 24(4), 243–248. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.24.4.9
Escobedo, F. J., Giannico, V., Jim, C. Y., Sanesi, G., & Lafortezza, R. (2019). Urban forests, ecosystem services, green infrastructure and nature-based solutions: Nexus or evolving metaphors? Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 37, 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.02.011
European Commission. (2015). Towards an EU research and innovation policy agenda for nature-based solutions & re-naturing cities: Final report of the Horizon 2020 expert group on ’Nature-based solutions and re-naturing cities’: (full version). Publications Office of the European Union. http://dx.publications.europa.eu/10.2777/765301
European Commission. (2021). Evaluating the impact of nature-based solutions: A handbook for practitioners. Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/244577
Gómez Martín, E., Máñez Costa, M., & Schwerdtner Máñez, K. (2020). An operationalized classification of Nature Based Solutions for water-related hazards: From theory to practice. Ecological Economics, 167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106460
Hagedoorn, L. C., Koetse, M. J., & van Beukering, P. J. H. (2021). Estimating Benefits of Nature-based Solutions: Diverging Values From Choice Experiments With Time or Money Payments. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.686077
Hanley, N., Breeze, T. D., Ellis, C., & Goulson, D. (2015). Measuring the economic value of pollination services: Principles, evidence and knowledge gaps. Ecosystem Services, 14, 124–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.09.013
Hein, L. (2009). The Economic Value of the Pollination Service, a Review Across Scales. The Open Ecology Journal, 2(1). https://benthamopen.com/ABSTRACT/TOECOLJ-2-1-74
Herath, S., Choumert, J., & Maier, G. (2015). The value of the greenbelt in Vienna: A spatial hedonic analysis. The Annals of Regional Science, 54(2), 349–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-015-0657-1
IICA, y CATIE. (2019). Soluciones basadas en la naturaleza: Experiencias y oportunidades en los paisajes agrícolas de América Latina y el Caribe. https://repositorio.iica.int/handle/11324/8633
Jacobs, S., Dendoncker, N., Martín-López, B., Barton, D. N., Gomez-Baggethun, E., Boeraeve, F., McGrath, F. L., Vierikko, K., Geneletti, D., Sevecke, K. J., Pipart, N., Primmer, E., Mederly, P., Schmidt, S., Aragão, A., Baral, H., Bark, R. H., Briceno, T., Brogna, D., … Washbourne, C.-L. (2016). A new valuation school: Integrating diverse values of nature in resource and land use decisions. Ecosystem Services, 22, 213–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.11.007
Jianjun, J., Chong, J., & Lun, L. (2013). The economic valuation of cultivated land protection: A contingent valuation study in Wenling City, China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 119, 158–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.06.010
Kabisch, N., Frantzeskaki, N., Pauleit, S., Naumann, S., Davis, M., Artmann, M., Haase, D., Knapp, S., Korn, H., Stadler, J., Zaunberger, K., & Bonn, A. (2016). Nature-based solutions to climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban areas: Perspectives on indicators, knowledge gaps, barriers, and opportunities for action. Ecology and Society, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08373-210239
Keesstra, S., Nunes, J., Novara, A., Finger, D., Avelar, D., Kalantari, Z., & Cerdà, A. (2018). The superior effect of nature based solutions in land management for enhancing ecosystem services. Science of The Total Environment, 610–611, 997–1009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.077
Krauze, K., & Wagner, I. (2019). From classical water-ecosystem theories to nature-based solutions—Contextualizing nature-based solutions for sustainable city. Science of The Total Environment, 655, 697–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.187
Lafortezza, R., Chen, J., van den Bosch, C. K., & Randrup, T. B. (2018). Nature-based solutions for resilient landscapes and cities. Environmental Research, 165, 431–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.11.038
Laterra, P., Jobbágy, E., y Paruelo, J. (2011). Valoración de servicios ecosistémicos. Conceptos, herramientas y aplicaciones para el ordenamiento territorial. Ediciones INTA. https://inta.gob.ar/documentos/valoracion-de-servicios-ecosistemicos.-conceptos-herramientas-y-aplicaciones-para-el-ordenamiento-territorial
Liquete, C., Udias, A., Conte, G., Grizzetti, B., & Masi, F. (2016). Integrated valuation of a nature-based solution for water pollution control. Highlighting hidden benefits. Ecosystem Services, 22, 392–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.011
Lomas, P., Martín-López, B., Louit Lobos, C., Montoya, D., Montes, C., y Álvarez, S. (2005). Guía práctica para la valoración económica de los bienes y servicios ambientales de los ecosistemas. Fundación Interuniversitaria Fernanda González Bernáldez. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268285963_OBSOLETOOUTDATED_MATERIAL_GUIA_PRACTICA_PARA_LA_VALORACION_ECONOMICA_DE_LOS_BIENES_Y_SERVICIOS_AMBIENTALES_DE_LOS_ECOSISTEMAS
Lynch, L., & Duke, J. M. (2007). Economic Benefits of Farmland Preservation: Evidence from the United States. AgEcon Search. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.7342
Mabon, L. (2019). Enhancing post-disaster resilience by ‘building back greener’: Evaluating the contribution of nature-based solutions to recovery planning in Futaba County, Fukushima Prefecture, Japan. Landscape and Urban Planning, 187, 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.03.013
Macháč, J., Trantinová, M., & Zaňková, L. (2021). Externalities in agriculture: How to include their monetary value in decision-making? International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 18(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-020-02752-7
MacKinnon, K., & Hickey, V. (2009). Nature-based solutions to climate change. ORYX, 43(1), 15–16.
Maes, J., & Jacobs, S. (2017). Nature‐Based Solutions for Europe’s Sustainable Development. Conservation Letters, 10(1), 121–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12216
Morancho, A. B. (2003). A hedonic valuation of urban green areas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 66(1), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00093-8
Nesshöver, C., Assmuth, T., Irvine, K. N., Rusch, G. M., Waylen, K. A., Delbaere, B., Haase, D., Jones-Walters, L., Keune, H., Kovacs, E., Krauze, K., Külvik, M., Rey, F., van Dijk, J., Vistad, O. I., Wilkinson, M. E., & Wittmer, H. (2017). The science, policy and practice of nature-based solutions: An interdisciplinary perspective. Science of The Total Environment, 579, 1215–1227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.106
Parsons, G. (2017). Travel Costs Models. In A primer on nonmarket valuation (Champ et al, pp. 187–233). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Pedersen Zari, M., Kiddle, G. L., Blaschke, P., Gawler, S., & Loubser, D. (2019). Utilising nature-based solutions to increase resilience in Pacific Ocean Cities. Ecosystem Services, 38, 100968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100968
R Core Team. (2020). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
Raymond, C. M., Frantzeskaki, N., Kabisch, N., Berry, P., Breil, M., Nita, M. R., Geneletti, D., & Calfapietra, C. (2017). A framework for assessing and implementing the co-benefits of nature-based solutions in urban areas. Environmental Science and Policy, 77, 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.07.008
Rizvi, A. R. (2014). Nature Based Solutions for Human Resilience. IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature. https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/Rep-2014-008.pdf
RStudio Team. (2015). RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R [Computer software]. RStudio, Inc. http://www.rstudio.com/
Sander, H. A., & Zhao, C. (2015). Urban green and blue: Who values what and where? Land Use Policy, 42, 194–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.07.021
Santoro, S., Pluchinotta, I., Pagano, A., Pengal, P., Cokan, B., & Giordano, R. (2019). Assessing stakeholders’ risk perception to promote Nature Based Solutions as flood protection strategies: The case of the Glinščica river (Slovenia). Science of The Total Environment, 655, 188–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.116
Seddon, N., Sengupta, S., García-Espinosa, M., Hauler, I., Herr, D., & Rizvi, A. R. (2020). Nature-based Solutions in Nationally Determined Contributions. 62.
Shogren, J. F. (2008). Experimental Methods in Environmental Economics. 8. https://doi.org/DOI:10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2568
Song, Y., Kirkwood, N., Maksimović, Č., Zhen, X., O’Connor, D., Jin, Y., & Hou, D. (2019). Nature based solutions for contaminated land remediation and brownfield redevelopment in cities: A review. Science of the Total Environment, 663, 568–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.347
Steinhardt, G. (2019). Market-Value Pricing: Definitions, Concepts, and Processes for Market-Value Centric Pricing. Springer International Publishing. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783030107338
Taylor, L. (2017). Hedonics. In A primer on nonmarket valuation (Champ et al). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
UICN. (2016, September 27). Nature-based Solutions. IUCN. https://www.iucn.org/commissions/commission-ecosystem-management/our-work/nature-based-solutions
Van den Bosch, M., & Ode Sang, Å. (2017). Urban natural environments as nature-based solutions for improved public health – A systematic review of reviews. Environmental Research, 158, 373–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.05.040
Zwierzchowska, I., Fagiewicz, K., Poniży, L., Lupa, P., & Mizgajski, A. (2019). Introducing nature-based solutions into urban policy – facts and gaps. Case study of Poznań. Land Use Policy, 85, 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.03.025
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Diego Fernando Quirós Badilla, Johanna Solórzano Thompson, Javier Paniagua Molinay Tatiana Solano Pereira
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Revista Perspectivas Rurales. Nueva Época se encuentra bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional License.
Creado a partir de la obra en http://www.revistas.una.ac.cr/index.php/perspectivasrurales
Los autores/as que publiquen en esta revista aceptan las siguientes condiciones:
- Los autores/as conservan los derechos de autor y ceden a la revista el derecho de la primera publicación, con el trabajo registrado con la Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional, que permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado siempre que mencionen la autoría del trabajo y a la primera publicación en esta revista.
- Los autores/as pueden realizar otros acuerdos contractuales independientes y adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión del artículo publicado en esta revista (p. ej., incluirlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro) siempre que indiquen claramente que el trabajo se publicó por primera vez en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as a publicar su trabajo en Internet (por ejemplo en páginas institucionales o personales) antes y durante el proceso de revisión y publicación, ya que puede conducir a intercambios productivos y a una mayor y más rápida difusión del trabajo publicado.
