Bolivia and Chile on the Offensive via Mediated Public Diplomacy

Authors

  • Daniel Aguirre Azócar Universidad de Chile y Universidad del Pacífico, Chile
  • Juan Cristobal Villalobos

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15359/ri.89-2.1

Keywords:

The Hague, Bolivia-Chile, Public Diplomacy, Media, Digital

Abstract

This article focuses on recent messaging initiatives by Bolivia and Chile within the context of public diplomacy. By means of a content analysis of messaging efforts via media platforms, it expects to ascertain the breadth and scope of competing views guided by representative literature on the subject. Moreover, by analyzing social media usage of both countries, the article will compare and contrast public diplomacy initiatives as they pertain to the Bolivian case against Chile at the International Court of Justice. In ending, the study's expected outcomes include a tentative evaluation of each side's public diplomacy actions. In addition the final analysis should provide evidence pointing toward elements that further restrict a positive shared agenda for both countries in the foreseeable future.

References

ATB Red Nacional (2014). Demanda marítima de Bolivia ante la Corte Internacional de Justicia o "video del mar". Recuperado el 17 de agosto de 2016 en https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t6ZPCRcltnQ.

Cull, N. J. (2008). "Public Diplomacy before Gullion; the Evolution of a Phrase". In Snow, N. & Taylor, P., The Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy: 19-23

Entman, R. M. (2004). Projections of power: Framing news, public opinion, and US foreign policy. University of Chicago Press.

Entman, R. M. (2008). Theorizing Mediated Public Diplomacy: The US Case. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 13(2), 87-102. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161208314657

Fukuyama, F. (1989). The End of History?. The National Interest, (16), 3-18.

Gilboa, E. (2008). Searching for a Theory of Public Diplomacy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 55-77. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207312142

Golan, G. J. (2013). Introduction: An Integrated Approach to Public Diplomacy. American Behavioral Scientist, 0002764213487711. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213487711

Golan, G. J. (2014). The Advertorial as a Tool of Mediated Public Diplomacy. International Journal of Communication, 8, 21.

Golan, G. J., & Lukito, J. (2015). The Rise of the Dragon? Framing China’s Global leadership in Elite American Newspapers. International Communication Gazette, 77(8), 754-772. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048515601576

Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores de Chile (2014). Chile y la aspiración marítima boliviana: mito y realidad. Recuperado el 17 de agosto de 2016 en https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iWiTV2_TFAk.

Nye, J. S. (1990). Soft Power. Foreign policy, (80), 153-171. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/1148580

Nye, J. S. (2008). Public Diplomacy and Soft power. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 94-109. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207311699

Rose, G. (2012). Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to Researching with Visual Materials. Sage.

Tuch, H. N. (1990). Communicating with the World: US Public Diplomacy Overseas. Macmillan. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-60512-5

Wendt, A. (1999). Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge University Pres. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612183

Downloads

Published

2016-10-11

How to Cite

Bolivia and Chile on the Offensive via Mediated Public Diplomacy. (2016). Relaciones Internacionales, 89(2), 17-46. https://doi.org/10.15359/ri.89-2.1

Issue

Section

Articles (peer reviewed)

How to Cite

Bolivia and Chile on the Offensive via Mediated Public Diplomacy. (2016). Relaciones Internacionales, 89(2), 17-46. https://doi.org/10.15359/ri.89-2.1

Comentarios (ver términos de uso)

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 > >>