Brazil as a BRICS in the Shaping of the South American Region and Global Politics

Authors

  • Raúl Salgado Espinoza

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15359/ri.89-2.8

Keywords:

BRICS, Brazil, South America, Global and Regional leadership

Abstract

The BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) states as emerging powers have positioned themselves as the leading regional international actors and together are challenging the unilateral world leadership. This article presents the argument that the prospect of being a BRICS state helps each nation to project itself as a political world player, but could torpedo the projection of positioning as a regional leader as in the case of Brazil in the South American region. Other factors such as the influence of external economic, political and military forces might contribute to slowing down and even constraining the consolidation of Brazil as a leader of the region. In order to illustrate this, this article employs Modelski’s geopolitical model to explain the rise and decline of world powers in combination with some elements of the Positioning Theory. The evidence is based on a set of qualitative data and employs a qualitative content analysis for analyzing and interpreting the data.

References

Andrade, M., (2001). Geopolítica do Brasil, São Paulo: Papirus.

Álvarez Valdés, R., (2009). UNASUR; desde la perspectiva subregional a la regional: FLACSO, Serie Documentos Electrónicos 6, 1-11.

Armijo, L., (2007). The BRIC Countries (Brazil, Russia, India, and China) as Analytical Category: Mirage or Insight? Asian Perspective, 31 (4), 7-42.

Armijo, L. and Sotero, P., (2007). Brazil: To be or not to be a BRIC? Asian Perspective, 31 (4), 43-70.

Arvin, R., (2010). World Turned Upside Down? Rise of the Global South and the contemporary global financial turbulence. Third World Quarterly, 31 (3), 365-384. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2010.488465

Ascanio, A., (2010) Análisis del Discurso Político. México: Trillas.

BRICS Information Centre, (2016). What is new in the BRICS? University of Toronto. http://www.brics.utoronto.ca/ accessed 20.06.2016.

Câmara Dos Deputados (2010) Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil. 3rd Edition. Biblioteca Digital da Câmara Dos Deputados.

Cardoso, E. and Holland, M., (2010). South America for the Chinese? A trade-based Analysis. OECD. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1787/5kmh5gs82q0v-en

Cassiolato, J. and Vitorino, V., (2009). BRICS and Development Alternatives: Innovation Systems and Policies. London: Anthem Press.

Chiriboga Vega, M., (2009). ¿Es la CAN un sistema vigente de integración? Quito: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.

Comisión Económica para América Latina (CEPAL), (2010). Estudio económico de América Latina y el Caribe. Santiago de Chile: Naciones Unidas.

Couto e Silva, G., (1967). Geopolítica do Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Olimpyo

Couto e Silva, G., (1981). Planejamento Estratégico. Rio de Janeiro: Universidad de Brasilia.

Crane, R., (2015). Building Bridges among the BRICs. Edited by Robert Crane Independent Consultant, Paris, France. Palgrave Macmillan. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137375414

Dailami, M. and Masson, P., (2009). The New Multi-polar International Monetary system. The World Bank. Policy Research Working Paper. 5147. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-5147

Deciancio, M., (2016). Brazil’s Leadership through Global Channels: Autonomy, Diversification and Acceptance. In Global and Regional Leadership of BRICS Countries, Stephen Kingah y Cintia Quiliconi. New York: Springer. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22972-0_4

Derluguian, G, Goldfrank, W., (2000). Repetition, Variation and Transmutation as Scenarios for the Twenty First Century. In Questioning Geopolitics. Derluguian, G. and Greer, L. Connecticut: Praeger.

Duggan, N., (2015). BRICS and the Evolution of a New Agenda within Global Governance. In The European Union and the BRICS Complex Relations in the Era of Global Governance. Marek Revizorski. New York: Springer. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19099-0_2

Elsenhans, H., (1998). Imperialismus/Imperialismus Theorie. In Wӧrterbuch Staat und Politik Dieter Nohlen. Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung.

Flint, C., (2006). Introduction to Geopolitics. London: Routledge.

Goh, E., (2008). Great Powers and Hierarchical Order in Southeast Asia Analysing Regional Security Strategies. International Security, 32 (3), 113-157. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.2008.32.3.113

Heinrich Böll Stiftung. (2014). BRICS Summit Reader. Special E-Newsletter. 20: July 2014.

Heisbourg, F., (2010). The European Union and the Major Powers. Adelphi Papers, 50: 414, 17-40.

Hermann, M., (2008). Content Analysis. In Qualitative Methods in International Relations: A Pluralist Guide. Audie Klotz & Deepa Prakash. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230584129_10

Ho Chung, K., (2013). The BRICs Superpower Challenge Foreign and Security Policy Analysis. Surrey: ASHGATE.

Hurrell, A., (2010). Brazil: What Kind of Rising State in What Kind of Institutional Order? In Alexandroff, A. and Cooper, A., Rising States, Rising Institutions: Challenges for Global Governance. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.

International Monetary Fund, (2016). World Economic Outlook. Too Slow for Too Long Washington. April.

Jones, S., (2012). BRICS and Beyond Executive Lessons on Emerging Markets. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Publication

Kiely, R., (2015). The BRICs, US ‘Decline’ and Global Transformations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Kingah, S. and Quiliconi, C., (2016). Introduction: The BRICS in Global and Regional Governance, en Global and Regional Leadership of BRICS Countries Stephen Kingah y Cintia Quiliconi. New York: Springer. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22972-0_1

Klom, A., (2003). Mercosur and Brazil: A European Perspective: International Affairs, 79 (2), 351-368. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.00312

Koeller, P. and Cassiolato, J., (2009). Achievements and Shortcomings of Brazil’s Innovation policies. In Cassiolato, J. and Vitorino, V., BRICS and Development Alternatives: Innovation Systems and Policies. London: Anthem Press.

Kupchan, Ch., (2002). The End of the American Era. U. S. Foreign Policy and the Geopolitics of the Twenty First Century. New York: Knopf.

Magalhães, J., (1971). Minha Experiência diplomática. Rio de Janeiro: Livraria José Olympyo Editora.

Malamud, A., (2011). A leader without follower? The growing divergence between regional and global performance of Brazilian foreign policy. Latin American Politics and Society, 53 (3), 1-24. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2011.00123.x

Martins, M., (2015). The BRICS in the Global Order: A New Political Agenda?, en The European Union and the BRICS Complex Relations in the Era of Global Governance. Springer. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19099-0_3

Meira Mattos, C., (1979). Brasil, Geopolítica e Destino, 2nd ed, Rio de Janeiro: Olimpyo.

Meira Mattos, C., (1980). Uma Geopolítica Pan –Amazônica, Rio de Janeiro: Biblioteca do Exército.

Meyers, R., (1997). Grundbegriffe und theoretische Perspektiven der Internationalen Beziehung. In Grundwissen Politik. Geiss, H., Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung.

Modelski, G., (1987). Long Cycles in World Politics. Seattle: University of Washington Press. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09151-5

Moniz Bandeira, L,. (2006). Brazil as Regional Power and Its Relations with the United States. Latin American Perspective, 33 (3), 12-27. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X06287338

Nell, P., (2010). Redistribution and Recognition: what emerging regional powers want. Review of International Studies, 36, 951-974. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210510001385

Nicoll, A., (2010). China’s Three-Point Naval Strategy. The International Institute for Strategic Studies, 16 (37), 1-3.

Nicoll, A., (2010). India and China eye each other warily. The International Institute for Strategic Studies, 16 (47), 1-4.

Nolte, D., (2010). How to compare regional powers: analytical concepts and research topics. Review of International Studies. 36, 881-901. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S026021051000135X

Pelle, S., (2007). Understanding Emerging Markets. Building Business BRIC by Brick, New Delhi: Response Books.

Pinheiro, L. and Gaio, G., (2016). Cooperation for Development, Brazilian

Regional Leadership and Global Protagonism. In Global and Regional Leadership of BRICS Countries. Stephen Kingah y Cintia Quiliconi. New York: Springer. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22972-0_5

PRC National Bureau of Statistics and PRC General Administration of Customs, China's Customs Statistics, 2011. http://www.uschina.org/statistics/tradetable.html accessed on 13.01.2011.

Prys, M., (2010). Hegemony, Domination, Detachment: Differences in Regional Powerhood. International Studies Review, 12, 479-540. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2486.2010.00957.x

Quagliotti de Bellis, B, (1976). Geopolítica del Atlántico Sur. Montevideo: Fundación de Cutltura Universitaria.

Quagliotti de Bellis, B., (1988). The La Plata Basin in the Southern Cone. In Geopolitics of the Southern Cone and Antartica Kelly, Ph. and Child, J. Boulder: Rienner. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22972-0_14

Quiliconi, C. and Kingah, S., (2016). Conclusions: Leadership of the BRICS

and Implications for the European Union In Global and Regional Leadership of BRICS Countries Stephen Kingah y Cintia Quiliconi. New York: Springer.

Quiliconi, C. Sager, M. and Tussie, D., (2016). BRICS: Leadership in the Making. InGlobal and Regional Leadership of BRICS Countries. Stephen Kingah y Cintia Quiliconi. New York: Springer.

Revizorski, M., (2015). Introduction. The European Union and the BRICS Complex Relations in the Era of Global Governance. New York: Springer.

Sangmeister, H., (2003). “Amerika den Amerikanern”. Das Projekt einer gesamtamerikanishen Freihandelzone (ALCA/FTAA) wird in Lateinamerika untershiedlich beurteilt. Brennpunkt Lateinamerika, 3 (03), 17-27.

Santos-Paulino, A. and Wan, G., (2010). Southern Engines of Global Growth. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199580606.001.0001

Serbin, A., (2010). Regionalismo y Soberanía nacional en América Latina: Los nuevos desafíos. Nueva Sociedad, 42, 70-86.

Stuenkel, O., (2015). The BRICS and the Future of Global Order. London: LEXINGTON BOOKS.

Van Langenhove, L. Zwartjes M. and Papanagnou, G., (2016). Conceptualising Regional Leadership: The Positioning Theory Angle, en Global and Regional Leadership of BRICS Countries Stephen Kingah y Cintia Quiliconi. New York: Springer.

Wallerstein, I., (2003). The decline of American Power, New York: The New Press

Wang, Y. (2010). China’s Response to the Unipolar World: The Strategic Logic of Peaceful Development. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 45 (5), 554-567.

Wilson, D., Kelston, A., Ahmed, S., (2010). Is this the ‘BRICs Decade’?: BRICs Monthly, 10/03.

Goldman Sachs Global Economics, Commodities and Strategy Research at https://360.gs.com, Accessed on 10.11.2010

World Bank. (2010). World Development Indicator Database. In http://data.worldbank.org/indicator accessed on 15.11.2010

http://www.comunidadandina.org/documentos.asp accessed on 22.12.2010

http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/international/facilitatingtrade/freerade/index_en.htm accessed on 28.12.2010

http://www.iirsa.org/proyectos/Proyectos.aspx accessed on 10.12.2010

http://www.ustr.gov/trade-agreements accessed on 10.01.2011

http://ec.europa.eu/trade/creating-opportunities/bilateral-relations accessed 08.12.2010

http://www.brics.utoronto.ca/docs/index.html#ufa accessed on 30.06.2016

http://brics.itamaraty.gov.br/ accessed on 30.06.2016

http://bricspolicycenter.org/homolog accessed 10.06.2016

http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2016/01/pdf/text.pdf accessed on the 12.06.2016

Downloads

Published

2016-09-07

How to Cite

Brazil as a BRICS in the Shaping of the South American Region and Global Politics. (2016). Relaciones Internacionales, 89(2), 165-189. https://doi.org/10.15359/ri.89-2.8

Issue

Section

Articles (peer reviewed)

How to Cite

Brazil as a BRICS in the Shaping of the South American Region and Global Politics. (2016). Relaciones Internacionales, 89(2), 165-189. https://doi.org/10.15359/ri.89-2.8

Comentarios (ver términos de uso)

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 > >>