La política exterior de estados pequeños. El caso de Costa Rica
Keywords:
Teoría del Estado, Política Exterior de Costa Rica, Intervención militar, Costa Rica.Abstract
En el presente artículo se hace referencia, primero, al análisis de la política exterior, que difiere en algunos aspectos del realizado en el caso de otras políticas públicas, luego a la situación de los Estados pequeños. Ello permite tener un panorama teórico más claro para analizar el caso costarricense, en donde se pretende identificar los principales lineamientos de la política exterior, enfatizando la experiencia de las últimas administraciones gubernamentales; para, en la última sección, utilizar como ejemplo la decisión de participar en la coalición internacional que intervino militarmente en Irak.References
Allison, G. (1971). Essence of Decision. Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Boston: Harper Collins Publishers
Arts, B., and P. Verschuren. (1999). “Assessing Political Influence in Complex Decision-Making: An Instrument Based on Triangulation”. International Political Science Review. 20(4): 411-424.
Carlsnaes, W. (1992). “The Agency-Structure Problem in Foreign Policy Analysis”. International Studies Quarterly. 36(2): 245-270.
____________. (2003). “Foreign Policy” in Handbook of International Relations; edited by W. Carlsnaes; T. Risse; and R. Simmons. London:Sage Publications. Pp. 331-349.
Clemens, W. (1998). Dynamics of International Relations. Conflict and Mutual Gain in an Age of Global Interdependence. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Dacey, R., and L. Carlson. (2004). “Traditional Decision Making and the Poliheuristic Theory of Foreign Policy Decision Making”. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 48(1): 38-55.
Daremblum, Jaime. (1996). La política exterior de Costa Rica de cara al siglo XXI. Documentos de trabajo. No. 1. San José.
Easter, C. 1999. “Small States Development: A Commonwealth Vulnerability Index”. The Round Table. 88(351): 403-422.
Esmark, A. 2005. Tracing the National Mandate –Models for Governance in the Europeanization of Danish Administration. Paper presented to Conference Institutional Dynamics and the Transformation of European Politics. Oslo, May 26-29. Disponible: http://www.arena.uio.no/events/
Federspiel, U. 2001. The Power of Small Powers. Discussion Paper Series of Kennedy Center for International Studies. Utah:Brigham Young University.
Geva, N.; J. Mayhor; and J. Skorcek. (2000). “The Cognitive Calculus of Foreign Policy Decision Making”. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 44(4): 443-471.
Goertz, G. (2004). “Constraints, Compromises, and Decision Making”. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 48(1): 14-37.
Graebner, N. (1983). “Public Opinion and Foreign Policy: A Pragmatic View”. ” in Interactions Foreign Policy and Public Policy; edited by D. Piper and R. Terchek. Washington:American Enterprise Institute. Pp. 11-34.
Gross, F. (1954). Foreign Policy Analysis. New York:Philosophical Library.
Henrikson, A. (1999). Small States in World Politics: The international politics position and diplomatic influence of the World’s growing number of smaller countries. Paper prepared for Conference on Small States. Saint Lucie. February.
Henrikson, A. (2002). “Distance and Foreign Policy: A Political Geography Approach”. International Political Science Review. 23(4): 437-466.
Herrera, Carlos. (1986). Política Exterior de la Administración Monge Álvarez. 1982-1986. Tesis de Licenciatura en Relaciones Internacionales. Heredia:Universidad Nacional.
Hindmarsh, J. (1996). “Hod do We Define Small States and Islands? A Critical Analysis of Alternative Conceptualizations”. Convergence. 29(2).
Hudson, V. with C. Vore. (1995). “Foreign Policy Analysis Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow”. Mershon International Studies Review. 39: 20-238.
Ingebritsen, C. (2004). “Learning from Lilliput. Small States and EU Expansion”. Scandinavian Studies. 76(3): 369-384.
Julien, K. (1992). “The Problems of Small States”. The Round Table. 81(321).
Kegley, C., and E. Wittkopf. (2001). World Politics. Trend and Transformation. Boston; Bedford/St. Martin’s.
Kuperman, R. (2004). Ad Hoc Versus Dynamic Frameworks and Models of Foregin Policy Decision-Making. Paper presented for the 45th Annual ISA Convention; Montreal. March 17-20.
Lieb, D. (2004). “The Limits of Neorrealism: Marginal States and International Relations Theory”. Harvard International Review. 26(1).
Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores y Culto. 2005. Guía de Política Exterior. San José; Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores.
Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores. Memoria Anual: Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores y Culto. San José, Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores. (Se consultaron los años 1983-2006.
Mintz, A. 2004. “How do Leaders Make Decision? A Poliheuristic Perpective”. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 48(1): 3-13.
Misra, A. (2004a). “An introduction to the ‘small’ and ‘micro’ states of South Asia”. Contemporary South Asia. 13(2): 127-131.
____________. (2004b). “Theorising ‘small’ and ‘micro’ states behaviour using the Maldives, Bhutan and Nepal”. Contemporary South Asia. 13(2): 133-148.
Nillson, A. (1991). “Swedish Social Democracy in Central America: The Politics of Small State Solidarity”. Journal of International Studies and World Affairs. Fall. 33(3).
Papp, D. (1994). Contemporary International Relations. Frameworks for Understanding. New York; Macmillan College Publishing.
Payne, A. (2004). “Small States in the Global Politics of Development”. The Round Table. 93(376): 623-635.
Rojas, Francisco. (1990). Costa Rica: Política Exterior y Crisis Centroamericana. Heredia: Universidad Nacional.
_____________. 1992. Política Exterior de la Administración Arias Sánchez. 1986-1990. Cuadernos de Ciencias Sociales, No. 29. Heredia: Universidad Nacional y Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales.
Rosenau, J. (1982). “National (and Factional) Adaptation in Central America: Options for the 1980s” in Central America: International Dimensions of the Crisis; edited by R. Feinberg. New York; Holmes & Meier Publishers. Pp. 239-269
.
Russett, B., H. Starr, and D. Kinsella. (2000). World Politics. The Menu for Choice. Boston:Bedford/St. Martin’s.
Snyder, R., H. Bruck y B. Sapin. (1979). “La génesis de las decisiones como enfoque del estudio de la política internacional” en Teorías Contemporáneas sobre las Relaciones Internacionales editado por S. Hoffmann. Madrid: Editorial Tecnos.
Terchek, R. (1983). “Foreign and Domestic Policy Linkages: Constraints and Challenges to the Foreign Policy Process” ” in Interactions Foreign Policy and Public Policy; edited by D. Piper and R. Terchek. Washington: American Enterprise Institute. Pp. 51-69.
Terchek, R.; and D. Piper. (1983). “Introduction: Foreign Policy as Public Policy” in Interactions Foreign Policy and Public Policy; edited by D. Piper and R. Terchek. Washington: American Enterprise Institute.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Esta obra de Revista Temas de Nuestra América está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivar 4.0 Internacional.
Cualquier permiso que trascienda dicha licencia, debe solicitarse por escrito a la persona directora de la Revista
