Image and dosimetry quality control for digital mammography by using the Normi Mam Digital phantom

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15359/ru.32-2.5

Keywords:

X-Rays, image formation, radiation, medical technology

Abstract

In Costa Rica there is not an explicit recommendation given by the Regulatory Authorities for the utilization of a specific Phantom; that is why experts have to explore what is offered in the market. One of the most remarkable equipment is Normi Mam Digital made by PTW. This article introduces the results of image and dosimetry quality control, applied to the Normi Mam Digital Phantom to validate how the equipment complies with the recommendations of Human Health Series no. 17. The obtained results were satisfactory and achieved the regulatory tolerances by international sanitary organizations.    

References

Chiarelli, A. M.; Edwards, S. A. et al. (Setiembre de 2013). Digital Compared with Screen-Film Mammography: Performance Measures in Concurrent Cohorts within an Organized Breast Screening Program. Radiology, RSNA, 268(3), 684-693. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13122567

Dance, D. R.; Young, K. C. y Van Engen, R. E. (Junio de 2009). Further factors for the estimation of mean glandular dose using the United Kingdom, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 54(14), 4361-4372. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/14/002

González-Robledo, L.; González-Robledo, M. C.; Nigenda, G. y López-Carrillo, L. (2010). Acciones gubernamentales para la detección temprana del cáncer de mama en América Latina. Retos a futuro. Salud Pública México, 52(6). Doi https://doi.org/10.1590/S0036-36342010000600009

Huda, W; Sajewicz, A. M.; Ogden, K. M.; Scalzetti, E. M. y Dance, D. R. (Julio de 2002). How good is the ACR accreditation phantom for assessing image quality in digital mammography? Academic Radiology, 9, 764-772. Disponible en https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12139090

De las Herras, H.; Shöfer, F. et al. (2013). A phantom using titanium and Landolt rings for image quality evaluation in mammography. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 58(8), 17-30. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/8/L17

Harvey J., M. D.; Gard, C. et al. (Marzo de 2013). Reported Mammographic Density: Film-Screen versus Digital Acquisition. Radiology, RSNA, 266(3), 752-758. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.12120221

Kanal, M.; Krupinski, E. et al. (2013). ACR-AAPM-SIIM practice parameter for determinants of image quality in digital mammography. Journal Digital Imaging, 26, 10-25. DOI: 10.1007/s10278-012-9521-3

Organismo Internacional de Energía Atómica. (2009). Human Health Series no. 2, Quality Assurance Programme for Screen Film Mammography. Viena, Austria. Disponible en http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/Pub1381_web.pdf

Organismo Internacional de Energía Atómica. (2011). Human Health Series no. 17, Quality Assurance Programme for Digital Mammography. Viena, Austria. Disponible en http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/Pub1482_web.pdf

Organización Mundial de la Salud [OMS]. (2015). Cáncer de mama: prevención y control. Disponible en http://www.who.int/topics/cancer/breastcancer/es/

Organización Panamericana de la Salud [OPS]. (2014). Cáncer de mama en las Américas. Disponible en http://www.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=21588&Ite mid

Published

2018-07-26

Issue

Section

Original scientific papers (evaluated by academic peers)

Comentarios (ver términos de uso)

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 > >>