Experiences of Mexican teenage students when choosing a math degree: A mathematical narrative identity study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15359/ru.35-1.15Keywords:
Students choosing a math degree, students’ motivations, narrative inquiry, narrative identity, self-efficacy beliefsAbstract
There is little qualitative research on mathematics education focused on the experiences of young students when choosing a mathematics degree and how these experiences are assimilated into their mathematics life stories. The objective of this narrative inquiry is to identify the experiences of Mexican students who choose a mathematics degree through their mathematics life story. The conceptualization of a mathematical narrative identity divided into motivations, sources of motivation, and expectations allowed the identification of the following: (1) motivation of Mexican students for choosing a math degree, (2) sources of this motivation, and (3) future expectations related to this choice. This qualitative study was conducted based on a case study to prepare an in-depth analysis of multiple cases and frame them into a general description. Data was gathered from 47 interviews to collect students’ mathematics life stories. The four thematic analyses gave the following results: (1) the three main motivations were “liking mathematics”, self-efficacy belief, and the desire to become a “good teacher”, (2) the two main expectations were “being a good teacher” and “learning more mathematics”, and (3) the four main sources of motivations were self-efficacy belief, having “good teachers”, indirect experiences, and mastering knowledge. Results have similarities with the importance of self-efficacy beliefs and differences between “liking mathematics” and the desire to become a “good teacher” regarding the psychological explanations about the motivational forces to choose a math degree.
References
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman and Company.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In: H. Cooper (Ed.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, 2, 57–71. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004
Carrasco, L., & Sánchez, M. (2016). Factores que favorecen la elección de las matemáticas como profesión entre mujeres estudiantes de la Universidad Veracruzana. Perfiles Educativos, 38(151), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.24486167e.2016.151.54919
Cresswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design, quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications. Thousand Oaks, California.
Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (2006). Narrative inquiry. In: J. L. Green, G. Camilli, & P. B. Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in educational research (pp. 477–488). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Eccles, J. S.; Adler, T. F.; Futterman, R.; Goff, S. B.; Kaczala, C. M.; Meece, J. L., & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In: J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives. Psychological and sociological approaches. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Friedman & Co.
Hackett, G. (1985). Role of mathematics self-efficacy in the choice of math-related majors of college women and men: A path analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 32(1), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.32.1.47
Hackett, G. (1995). Self-efficacy in career choice and development. In: A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 232–258). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527692.010
Hackett, G., & Betz, N. E. (1995). Self-Efficacy and Career Choice and Development. In: J. A. Maddux (Ed.), Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment (pp. 249–280). New York, NY: Plenum Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6868-5_9
Lent, R. W., & Brown, S. D. (2013). Social cognitive model of career self-management: Towards a unifying view of adaptive career behavior across the life span. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60(4), 557–568. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033446
Lent, R. W.; Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a Unifying Social Cognitive Theory of Career and Academic Interest, Choice, and Performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79–122. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027
Lent, R. W.; Lopez, F. G., & Bieschke, K. J. (1991). Mathematics self-efficacy: Sources and relation to science-based career choice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 424–430. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.38.4.424
Lent, R. W.; Lopez, F. G., & Bieschke, K. J. (1993). Predicting mathematics-related choice and success behaviors: Test of an expanded social cognitive. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 42(2), 223–236. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1993.1016
Manzano, R., & Sánchez, M. (2017). Qué motiva a las mujeres a estudiar Matemáticas: un estudio de caso. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación Matemática, (49), 163–180.
McAdams, D. P. (2011). Narrative Identity. In: S. J. Schwartz, K. Luyckx, & V. L. Vignoles (Eds.), Handbook of Identity Theory and Research (pp. 99–115). New York, NY: Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7988-9
McAdams, D. P., & McLean, K. C. (2013). Narrative Identity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(3), 233–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413475622
McLeod, D. B. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualization. In: D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 575–596). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Meece, J. L.; Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1990). Predictors of math anxiety and its influence on young adolescents’ course enrollment intentions and performance in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.60
Sánchez, M.; Romo, A.; Mendoza, A.; Molina, G., & Castañeda, A. (2013). Factors motivating the choice of mathematics as a career among Mexican female students. In: B. Ubuz, C. Haser, & M. A. Mariotti (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eighteenth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 1409–1418). Antalya, Turkey: European Society for Research in Mathematics Education.
Usher, E. L. (2009). Sources of Middle School Students’ Self-Efficacy in Mathematics: A Qualitative Investigation. American Educational Research Journal, 46(1), 275–314. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831208324517
Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2009). Sources of self-efficacy in mathematics: A validation study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(1), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.09.002
Watt, H. M. G. (2005). Exploring adolescent motivations for pursuing maths-related careers. Australian Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 5, 107–116.
Watt, H. M. G. (2006). The role of motivation in gendered educational and occupational trajectories related to maths. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12(4), 305–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610600765562
Wigfield, A. (1994). Expectancy-Value Theory of Achievement Motivation: A Developmental Perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 6(1), 49–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02209024
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-Value Theory of Achievement Motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Yin, R. K. (2012). Applications of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Zeldin, A. L.; Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2008). A comparative study of the self-efficacy beliefs of successful men and women in mathematics, science, and technology careers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(9), 1036–1058. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20195
Zeldin, A. L., & Pajares, F. (2000). Against the odds: Self-efficacy beliefs of women in mathematical, scientific, and technological careers. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 215–246. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312037001215
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors guarantee the journal the right to be the first publication of the work as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors can set separate additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (eg, place it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
3. The authors have declared to hold all permissions to use the resources they provided in the paper (images, tables, among others) and assume full responsibility for damages to third parties.
4. The opinions expressed in the paper are the exclusive responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the editors or the Universidad Nacional.
Uniciencia Journal and all its productions are under Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Unported.
There is neither fee for access nor Article Processing Charge (APC)
