Suitability criteria used by future primary school teachers in the assessment of math educational videos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15359/ru.35-2.19Keywords:
teacher training, reflective competence, didactic suitability criteria, educational video, percentagesAbstract
This research describes the criteria implicitly used by a group of future primary school teachers when assessing the adequacy of the planned didactical trajectory after watching two videos in an educational channel to teach sixth graders a specific content, percentages. The content analysis methodology is used to examine the written reports prepared by 61 third-year students enrolled in the class Design and Development of Primary Education Mathematics Curriculum during the 2019-2020 school year, as part of the Primary Teacher Education program at the University of Granada, Spain. Their reports were assessed based on the authors’ a priori consensus analysis of the didactic suitability of educational videos. Results show that student teachers implicitly use epistemic and interactive criteria to a great extent, as well as cognitive, affective, and ecological criteria. Although in general their assessments are quite inaccurate, student teachers recognize the need for teachers to analyze the relevance of these resources before recommending them to their students, which have acquired a fundamental role in education with the virtual teaching format due to the arrival of COVID-19. The paper highlights the importance of giving educators the opportunity to reflect on the practice by incorporating tools that allow them to direct their attention to relevant aspects in the teaching and learning process.
References
Beltrán-Pellicer, P., Giacomone, B., & Burgos, M. (2018). Online educational videos according to specific didactics: the case of mathematics. Cultura y Educación, 30(4), 633-662. https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2018.1524651
Beltrán-Pellicer, P., Godino, J. D., & Giacomone, B. (2018). Elaboración de indicadores específicos de idoneidad didáctica en probabilidad: Aplicación para la reflexión sobre la práctica docente. Bolema, 32(61), 526-548. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-4415v32n61a11
Borba, M. C., Askar, P., Engelbrecht, J., Gadanidis, G., Llinares, S., & Aguilar, M. S. (2016). Blended learning, e-learning and mobile learning in mathematics education. ZDM, 48(5), 589-610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0798-4
Breda, A. (2020). Características del análisis didáctico realizado por profesores para justificar la mejora en la enseñanza de las matemáticas. Bolema, 34(66), 69-88. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-4415v34n66a04
Breda, A., Font, V., & Pino-Fan, L. (2018). Criterios valorativos y normativos en la didáctica de las matemáticas: El caso del constructo idoneidad didáctica. Bolema, 32(60), 255-278. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-4415v32n60a13
Breda, A., Pino-Fan, L., & Font, V. (2017). Meta didactic-mathematical knowledge of teachers: criteria for the reflections and assessment on teaching practice. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 13(6), 1893-1918. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01207a
Burgos, M., Beltrán-Pellicer, P., & Godino, J. D. (2020). La cuestión de la idoneidad de los vídeos educativos de matemáticas: Una experiencia de análisis con futuros maestros de educación primaria | The issue of didactical suitability in mathematics educational videos: experience of analysis with prospective primary school teachers. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 78(275), 27-49. https://doi.org/10.22550/REP78-1-2020-07
Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education. Routledge.
Dabbagh, B., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal Learning Environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(1), 3-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.06.002
Dole, S. (2010). Promoting Percent as a Proportion in Eighth-Grade Mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 10(7), 345-396.
Duffy, P. (2008). Engaging the YouTube Google-eyed generation: Strategies for using Web 2.0 in teaching and learning. Electronic Journal of E-learning, 6(2), 119-130.
Esqué de los Ojos, D., & Breda, A. (2021). Valoración y rediseño de una unidad sobre proporcionalidad, utilizando la herramienta idoneidad didáctica. Uniciencia, 35(1), 38-54. https://doi.org/10.15359/ru.35-1.3
Gellert, U., Becerra, R., & Chapman, O. (2013). Research methods in mathematics teacher education. En K. M. A. Clements, A. J. Bishop, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick & F. Leung (Eds.), Third international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 327-360). Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4684-2_11
Godino, J. D. (2013). Indicadores de idoneidad didáctica de procesos de enseñanza y aprendizaje de las matemáticas. Cuadernos de Investigación y Formación en Educación Matemática, 11, 111-132.
Godino, J. D., Batanero, C., & Font, V. (2007). The onto-semiotic approach to research in mathematics education. ZDM The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 39(1-2), 127-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-006-0004-1
Godino, J. D., Bencomo, D., Font, V., & Wilhelmi, M. R. (2006). Análisis y valoración de la idoneidad didáctica de procesos de estudio de las matemáticas. Paradigma, 27(2), 221-252.
Godino, J. D., Giacomone, B., Batanero, C., & Font, V. (2017). Enfoque ontosemiótico de los conocimientos y competencias del profesor de matemáticas. Bolema, 31(57), 90-113. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-4415v31n57a05
He, W., Holton, A., Farkas, G., & Warschauer, M. (2016). The effects of flipped instruction on out-of-class study time, exam performance, and student perceptions. Learning and Instruction, 45, 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.07.001
Hummes, V. B., Font, V. & Breda, A. (2019). Uso combinado del estudio de clases y la idoneidad didáctica para el desarrollo de la reflexión sobre la propia práctica en la formación de profesores de matemáticas. Acta Scientiae, 21(1), 64-82.
Lafuente-Lechuga, M. & Faura-Martínez, U. (2019). Evaluation of videos of mathematical concepts made by students. Cultura y Educación, 31(4), 845-864. https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2019.1656488
Nilssen, V. (2010). Encouraging the Habit of Seeing in Student Teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 591-598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.09.005
Parker, M & Leinhardt, G. (1995). Percent: a privileged proportion. Review of Educational Research, 65(4), 421-481. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543065004421
Portugal, K. O., Arruda, S. D. M., & Passos, M. M. (2018). Free-choice teaching: how YouTube presents a new kind of teacher. Revista Electrónica de Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 17(1), 183–199.
Posadas, P., & Godino, J. D. (2017). Reflexión sobre la práctica docente como estrategia formativa para desarrollar el conocimiento didáctico-matemático. Didacticae, 1, 77-96.
Pozo-Sánchez, S., López-Belmonte, J., Rodríguez-García, A. M., & López-Núñez J. A. (2020). Competencia digital docente para el uso y gestión analítica informacional del aprendizaje invertido. Cultura y Educación, 32(2), 226-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2020.1741876
Ramos-Rodríguez, E., Flores, P., & Ponte, J. P. (2017). An approach to the notion of reflective teacher and its exemplification on mathematics education. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 30(1), 85-102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-016-9383-6
Seckel, M. J. & Font, V. (2020). Competencia reflexiva en formadores del profesorado de matemática. Magis, Revista Internacional de Investigación en Educación, 12(25), 127-144. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.m12-25.crfp
Sun, J. & van Es, E. A. (2015). An Exploratory Study of the Influence that Analyzing Teaching Has on Preservice Teachers' Classroom Practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(3), 201-214. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487115574103
Turney, C. S. M., Robinson, D., Lee, M., & Soutar, A. (2009). Using technology to direct learning in higher education. The way forward? Active Learning in Higher Education, 10(1), 71-83. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787408100196
Zainuddin, Z., Habiburrahim, H., Muluk, S., & Keumala, C. M. (2019). How do students become self-directed learners in the EFL flipped-class pedagogy? A study in higher education. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8, 678. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v8i3.15270
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors guarantee the journal the right to be the first publication of the work as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors can set separate additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (eg, place it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
3. The authors have declared to hold all permissions to use the resources they provided in the paper (images, tables, among others) and assume full responsibility for damages to third parties.
4. The opinions expressed in the paper are the exclusive responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the editors or the Universidad Nacional.
Uniciencia Journal and all its productions are under Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Unported.
There is neither fee for access nor Article Processing Charge (APC)